1 / 38

The Future of Flavor Physics at Hadron Colliders CIPANP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University

The Future of Flavor Physics at Hadron Colliders CIPANP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University. B Physics Today. CKM Picture okay CP Violation observed No conflict with SM. sin(2 b ) = 0.734 +/- 0.054. Surprising B Physics. >10 11 b hadrons (including B s ).

sandersg
Download Presentation

The Future of Flavor Physics at Hadron Colliders CIPANP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Future of Flavor Physics at Hadron Colliders CIPANP 2003 K. Honscheid Ohio State University CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  2. B Physics Today • CKM Picture okay • CP Violation observed • No conflict with SM sin(2b) = 0.734 +/- 0.054 CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  3. Surprising B Physics >1011 b hadrons (including Bs) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  4. B Physics at Hadron Colliders • Energy 2 TeV 14 TeV • b cross section ~100 mb ~500 mb • c cross section ~1000 mb ~3500 mb • b fraction 2x10-3 6x10-3 • Inst. Luminosity 2x1032 >2x1032 • Bunch spacing 132 ns (396 ns) 25 ns • Int./crossing <2> (<6>) <1> • Luminous region 30 cm 5.3 cm Tevatron LHC Large cross sections Triggering is an issue All b-hadrons produced (B, Bs, Bc, b-baryons) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  5. Detector Requirements • Vertex, decay distance • Momentum • PID • Neutrals (g, p0) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From F. Teubert

  6. CDF and D0 • CDF pioneered B physics at hadron collider. • New for Run II • TOF (Particle ID) • Detached Vertex Trigger • Improved tracking • D0 enters B physics • New for Run II • Tracking • Detached Vertex Trigger (soon) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  7. Atlas and CMS • Acceptance • |h| < 2.5 • Particle ID • ATLAS v.limited p-K separation, ~0.8s from TRD • Di-lepton trigger • Vertexing • Special pixel B layer R~5cm • “Low” luminosity running • Lumi 1033 cm-2s-1 • Only 30fb-1 (3 years) • Specialist B triggers • BUT:DAQ Bandwidth only 100 evts/s to tape for ALL physics ATLAS CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From N. Harnew

  8. 100mb 230mb Forward vs. Central Geometry Multi-purpose experiments require large solid angle coverage. Central Geometry (CDF, D0, Atlas, CMS) Dedicated B experiments can take advantage of Forward geometry (BTeV, LHCb) bg b production angle b production angle CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  9. LHCb Light • No tracking stations in magnet region • Reduced material budget • (fringe) magnetic field in tracking station(s) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  10. The Importance of Particle ID For example: B-> p+p- Purity = 84% ; Efficiency = 90% B0 h+h- s ~17 MeV CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  11. Pixel Detector • Detached Vertex Trigger • Find the primary vertex • Identify tracks which miss it • Calculates the significance of detachment • For EVERY crossing Vacuum Vessel PbWO4 EM Calorimeter • 60 pixel planes • inside magnet • s = 5-10 mm 10500 crystals 220 mm long, 28x28 mm2 Beam Line b,b/sb s(h->gg) ~ 5 MeV s(p->gg) ~ 3 MeV Proper time resolution: 46 fs CLEO/BaBar/BELLE-like performance in a hadron Collider environment! The BTeV Detector CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  12. Fully simulated bb event using Geant 3 • incl. multiple scattering, hadronic interactions • decays in flight • Kalman fitter CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  13. Decay efficiency(%) Decay efficiency(%) B p+p-63 Bo K+p- 63 Bs DsK 74 Bo J/y Ks 50 B- DoK-70 Bs J/yK* 68 B- Ksp-27 Bo K*g 40 Efficiencies and Tagging • For a requirement of at least 2 tracks detached by more than 6s, we trigger on only 1% of the beam crossings and achieve the following trigger efficiencies for these states (<2> int. per crossing): • e efficiency; D  Dilution or (Nright-Nwrong)/(Nright+Nwrong) • Effective tagging efficiency  eD2 • Extensive study for BTeV uses • Opposite sign K± • Jet Charge • Same side p± (for Bo) or K± for (Bs) • Leptons • Conclusion: eD2 (Bo) = 0.10, eD2 (Bs) = 0.13(difference due to same side tagging) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  14. The Physics Goals • There is New Physics out there: • Baryon Asymmetry of Universe & by Dark Matter • Hierarchy problem • Plethora of fundamental parameters • … • B Experiments at Hadron Colliders are well positioned to: • Perform precision measurements of CKM Elements withsmall model dependence. • Search for New Physics via CP phases • Search for New Physics via Rare Decays • Help interpret new results found elsewhere (LHC, neutrinos) • Complete a broad program in heavy flavor physics • Weak decay processes, B’s, polarization, Dalitz plots, QCD… • Semileptonic decays including Lb • b & c quark Production • Structure: B(s) spetroscopy, b-baryon states • Bc decays CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  15. Part 1: Is the CKM Picture correct? • Use different sets of measurements to define apex of triangle (adopted from Peskin) • Also have eK (CP in KL system) Bd mixing phase Magnitudes Bs mixing phase Can also measure gvia B-DoK- , CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  16. Measuring aUsing Borp  p+p-po • A Dalitz Plot analysis gives both sin(2a) and cos(2a)(Snyder & Quinn) • Measured branching ratios are: • B(B-rop-) = ~10-5 • B(Bor-p+ + r+p-) = ~3x10-5 • B(Boropo) <0.5x10-5 • Snyder & Quinn showed that 1000-2000 tagged events are sufficient • Not easy to measure • p0 reconstruction • Not easy to analyze • 9 parameter likelihood fit Nearly empty (r polarization) Slow p0’s Dalitz Plot for Borp CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  17. Yields for Borp • Based 9.9x106 background events • Bor+p- 5400 events, S/B = 4.1 • Boropo 780 events, S/B = 0.3 Boropo Signal Background po g g mB (GeV) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State mB (GeV)

  18. minimum c2 non-resonant non-rp bkgrd resonant non-rp bkgrd Our Estimate of Accuracy on a • Geant simulation of Borp, (for 1.4x107 s) Example: 1000 Borp signal + backgrounds With input a=77.3o CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  19. 6 5 4 3 2 1 Bs Mixing (Vtd/Vts) • Dms (~xs)= DG·C where C can be calculated inside the S. M. • CDF sensitive to xs ~ 30 • DG/G: Bs->yf seen Expect s(DG/G) ~ 2% after Run II • BTeV reaches sensitivity to xs of 80 in 3.2 years CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  20. ± One of several ways to determine g:BsDsK • Theoretically clean, BR ~ 10-4 • ~ 6.5 MeV/c2 s = 418 mm s = 168 mm Bs vtx resolution (mm) Ds vtx resolution (mm) Dsmass (GeV) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  21. gfrom Bs D-s K+ , D+s K-(II) • Needed: • Hadronic trigger • K/p separation • Good proper time resolution • From the measurement of 4 time-dependent asymmetries one gets g-2dg • 2 same order tree level amplitudes (3) : large asymmetries, NP contributes unlikely • Sensitivity depends upon • relative amplitudes • strong phase difference • values ofg, Dms , DGs /Gs For Dms=20 ps–1: s(g) ~ 10o For Dms=30 ps–1: s(g) ~ 12o In one year: 8k BsDsKreconstructed events CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From M. Musy

  22. Measuring c • In the SM the phases and magnitudes are correlated: • l = |Vus| = 0.2205±0.0018 • c is the phase of Vts -> Bs Mixing • Good: Bs->J/yf plus non-trivial angular analysis • Better: Bs -> CP eigenstate such asBsJ/yh() ,hgg,hrg Silva & Wolfenstein (hep-ph/9610208)Aleksan, Kayser & London CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  23. Measuring c II • BTeV can reconstruct h and h’ • Yield in one year • BsJ/y h: 2,800 events with S/B = 15 • BsJ/y h: 9,800 events with S/B = 30 • Error on sin(2c) = 0.024 • With c ~ 2o a precision measurement will require a few years. CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  24. Physics Reach (CKM) in 107 s CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  25. Bc mesons • CDF: mBc = 6.4 +/- 0.4 GeV tBc ~ 0.5 ps • BTeV/LHCb: Precisionmeasurements of mass, lifetime • Search for CPV in Bc -> J/yD+or Bc -> DsD • LHCb acceptance ~30% p (GeV) LHCb preliminary study s(ppBc) ~300 nb 109 Bc/ year Bc  J/y p (BR ~10-2) e ~ 2% 12k events/year Background from B J/y X and prompt J/y reduced cutting on the distance between primary vertex and Bc vertex CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State M( J/y(mm) p) GeV/c2

  26. Part II: Search for New Physics For a nice overview see: S. Stone “BTeV Physics” athttp://doe-hep.hep.net/P5StoneMarch2003.pdf CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  27. First Example: Supersymmetry • Supersymmetry: In general 80 constants & 43 phases • MSSM: 2 phases (Nir, hep-ph/9911321) • New Physics in Bo mixing: qD,Bodecay: qA,Do mixing: fKp Difference  NP New Physics CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  28. Rare b Decays • Search for New Physics in Loop diagrams • New fermion like objects in addition to t, c or u • New Gauge-like objects in addition to W, Z or g • Inclusive Rare Decays including • bsg • bdg • bsl+l- • Exclusive Rare Decays such as • Brg, K*g • BK*l+l-Dalitz plot & polarization g, l+l- BoK*g CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  29. Yield, S/B for Rare b Decays CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  30. Ali et. al, hep-ph/9910221 Polarization in BoK*om+m- • BTeV data compared to Burdman et al calculation • Dilepton invariant mass distributions,forward-backward asymmetrydiscriminate among the SM and various supersymmetric theories.(Ali, Lunghi, Greub & Hiller, hep-ph/0112300) • One year for K*l+l-, enough to determine if New Physics is present CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  31. Rare Leptonic Decays Bs0  mm Standard Model BR ~ 4x10-9 Here the General Purpose Detectors have an advantage : high pT di-muon triggering at high (1x1034) luminosity. CMS : 100 fb-1 (107s at 1034 cm-2s-1) ~26 signal events 6.4 events background Search alsoforBd0 mm Standard Model BR ~ 1x10-10 Muon trigger : 2m’s with pT > 4 GeV | h| < 2.4 CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  32. Another Example: Extra Dimensions • Aranda & Lorenzo Diaz-Cruz, “Flavor Symmetries in Extra Dimensions” (hep-ph/0207059) (Buras et al. hep-ph/0212143) • Extra spatial dimension is compactified at scale 1/R = 250 GeV on up • No effect on |Vub/Vcb|, DMd/DMs , sin(2b) Bs -> mm –100 –8% g +72% |Vtd| CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  33. Summary • Heavy quark physics at hadron colliders provides a unique opportunity to • measure fundamental parameters of the Standard Model with no or only small model dependence • discover new physics in CP violating amplitudes or rare decays. • interpret new phenomena found elsewhere (e.g. LHC) • Some scenarios are clear others will be a surpriseThis program requires a general purpose B detector like BTeV and LHCb with • an efficient, unbiased trigger and a high performance DAQ • a superb charged particle tracking system • good particle identification • excellent photon detection CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  34. Additional Transparenciesfrom BTeV and LHCb Studies CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State

  35. dg (= c)from Bs J/y f • In SM fS = -2dg = -2l2h ~10-2 • Sensitive to New Physics effects in the Bs-Bs system In one year: 109 k events Bs J/y (m+m-) f 19 k events Bs J/y (e+e-) f J/y f is not CP eigenstate: needs fit to angular distributions of decay final states as a function of proper time s=36±1 fs Assuming Dms=20 ps–1: s (2dg) ~ 2o CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From M. Musy

  36. Current status of LHCbPhysics Reach in 1 year (2fb–1) All numbers will be updated together with more channels in the re-optimization LHCb TDR (September 2003) CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From M. Musy

  37. A simplified trigger comparison CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From U. Egede

  38. Unitarity Triangles Bd0  p+ p- Bd0  rp BS0  DS p Bd0  DK*0 BS0  DSK Bd0  D* p, 3p BS0  J/y f Bd0  J/yKS0 dg = c CIPANP2003K. Honscheid Ohio State From N. Harnew

More Related