1 / 25

Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation

This article discusses the feasibility analysis and economic analysis practices for evaluating R&D programs. It explores the purpose of feasibility analysis, the components involved, and the economic metrics for cost-benefit analysis. The article also provides examples and discusses the need for more intense data on program performance and guidelines for boundaries.

sandramann
Download Presentation

Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cost-Benefit Analysis for R&D Program Evaluation 2008. 11Jiyoung Parkjypark@kistep.re.kr

  2. Contents Feasibility Analysis on R&D Programs Economic Analysis Practices Discussions

  3. Feasibility Analysis on R&D Programs

  4. Feasibility Analysis on R&D • Purpose • Substantiate the feasibility of large-scale public investment R&D programs • Enhance fiscal efficiency and productivity • Subjects • Newly proposed programs of budget plans over $50 M • Programs with concrete plans on technology development • Feasibility Analysis system has been legislated by the end of 2006.

  5. Process Overall Assessment General Criteria Uncertainties Demand Goals Contents Resources Plan Expected Effects Alternatives Success Timing Benefits Do ? Do not ?

  6. Components • Technical Analysis • Overlapping of existing programs, Research development plan, Potential to technical success, etc. • Systematic model approach • Output analysis (Patent, License, Publication and citation) • Surveys • Policy Analysis • Relevance to national strategic plan, National priority, Contingency plans for risks, etc. • National policy and priorities • Relevant issues and alternative plans

  7. Components • Economic/Impact Analysis • Economic benefit, Economic spill-over, Social spill-over, Scientific/Technical spill-over, etc. • Input-Output Analysis, Patent Analysis etc. • Cost-Effective Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis • Surveys • Overall Assessment based on Technical/Policy/Impact Analysis (Analytical Hierarchy Process) • Determine relevant importance of each criteria • Maintain balance between qualitative & quantitative analysis

  8. Economic Analysis

  9. Cost & Benefit Analysis • Economic metrics for Cost/Benefit • NPV (Net Present Value) = Amount willing to pay now for the future benefit • IRR (Internal Rate of Return) = Rate of return if NPV is zero • C/B Ratio = Ratio of discounted cash flows • Types of benefit • Direct/Indirect, Tangible/Intangible, Economic/Non-economic… • First step is to be aware of the characteristics of R&D • Very high uncertainty, very high payoffs : internet, Life science, Solar energy … • Seed corn for the future, especially the early stage R&D

  10. Types of Benefits

  11. Applications to R&D Programs • Industrial R&D • Need to prove expected benefit exceeds projected cost • B/C result for major decision criteria • R&D for Public Welfare • Combined tangible & intangible benefits • B/C result for provide alternatives • Basic Research • Do not need to calculate B/C • Sometimes proves justification of public investment

  12. Assessment of Costs • R&D activities for providing infrastructure • Research centers, Fabrication facilities, Large R&D facilities such as Accelerators • Cost calculation based on design, construction cost, etc. • R&D activities for producing knowledge, intellectual properties • DB for categorized program cost DB • R&D stages, R&D objectives, R&D field, etc. • Provides range of investment • Indirect costs are not considered. • Sunk costs are not considered.

  13. Assessment of Costs

  14. Assessment of Benefit • Approaches based on market size Market research Technology forecast Projected Market Size Expected Market Share Market analysis Patent analysis Profits Value-added rate -Published by Bank of Korea R&D Contribution to GDP growth by industry Contribution of R&D

  15. Assessment of Benefit

  16. Assessment of Benefit • Approaches based on performance data Performance analysis data of similar programs Expected # of Patents Business from the patents Follow-up monitoring of similar programs Profits Value-added rate -Published by Bank of Korea R&D Contribution to GDP growth by industry Contribution of R&D

  17. Assessment of Benefit • Approaches based on synergies among investments Expected increased # of papers Case studies - Integration, new facilities Spin-offs by unit input Averaged over 3 years Case studies - multiplier effect Benefits from R&D

  18. Assessment of Benefit • Approaches based on cost avoidance User data - Current and future demand Expected # of users Cost avoidance (in use of R&D facility) Traveling cost Time-saving

  19. Practices

  20. Examples – Targeting Economic benefit • New drug discovery (target materials) • Reduced initial investment was recommended • Increased investment will be considered after 4-year program monitoring

  21. Examples – Combined benefits • Fusion Research for environment • Rejected for R&D program targeting industrialization • Recommended small investment for early-stage fusion research

  22. Examples – Intangible benefits • Basic Research for Clean Energy • Never used the numbers for decision making • Provide justification of governmental investment

  23. Discussions

  24. Discussions • Heroic calculation? • Not a real data • Need guidelines of boundaries • Need more intense data on program performance • Need to know more on the mechanism of success or fail to reduce uncertainty • Need guidelines combining B/C result and cost-effectiveness to make decision • We still want to apply cost-Benefit analysis on R&D`!

  25. Thank You ! jypark@kistep.re.kr

More Related