190 likes | 344 Views
Activation studies on benefit of the selection of the ESS target concept. D. Ene. M. P. W. Chin. C. Kharoua. E. Noah. F. Plewinski ESSS-AB. Stora Algatan 4. Lund. Sweden. ESS in Lund. Goal. Development of a method to be used for residual field estimation for target
E N D
Activation studies on benefit of the selection of the ESS target concept D. Ene. M. P. W. Chin. C. Kharoua. E. Noah. F. Plewinski ESSS-AB. Stora Algatan 4. Lund. Sweden
ESS in Lund SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Goal • Development of a method to be used for residual field estimation for target • and its surroundings. • Selection of the appropriate approach for the optimized model estimates. • Rough estimates for order of magnitude evaluations. • Global amounts are analyzed. • -Investigation of the influence of various parameters: • -proton beam energy; • -target material; • -complexity of the geometry model. • irradiation history, beam profile. etc SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Neutron flux in ith cell ⇨The neutron flux is assumed to be constant over the irradiation period and not being modified by the irradiated medium RESIDUAL RADIATION: Method Geometry and materials description PHITS/ MCNPX Residues in ith cell Irradiation Scheme- DCHAIN-SP-2001/ CINDER 40 y irradiation @5000h Activation products & Photon sources MCNPX H*(10) SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Input data Moderators: L-H2 R=16cm. H=20cm Proton beam: Gauss :2sx = 10 cm 2sy =3 cm E= 2.5GeV | ( 1-4) GeV Target materials: Hg. PbBi. PbAu. W (Ta claded) Target vessel: SS316 Moderator clad: Al Beam window: AlMg3 Irradiation history: 38 y 5 MW @ 5000h 5000 h 5MW 3678 h 0 5000 h 5 MW Normalization : 5 MW Preliminary results SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Proton beam energy Hg target neutrons protons SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Proton beam energy Hg_target SS vessel daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 7
Details in modeling Hg target Reflector configuration Hg target daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 8
Details in modeling Al clad SS vessel SS vessel 51Cr, 55Fe, 3H,54Mn 3H, 51Cr, 55Fe,63Ni, 60Co 59Ni, 14C, 93Mo,91Nb Al clad 28Al 3H 26Al, 14C SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Details in modeling stars Hg target Hg target daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 10
Target material T#1 T#1 198Au. 187Ws (n.g) (JEF2.2) ? T#1 194Hg-194Au 208Bi 202Pb 163Ho. 191Nb. 93Mo daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 11
Target material Hg PbBi W PbAu daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 12
Target material Activation | TOP 10 @ 1 y daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 13
Comparison of tools Hg target daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 14
Detailed results Beam window #2 SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010
Conclusions • Changing the proton beam energy while maintaining the same beam power does not change substantially the total radioactivity in the target material • Induced radioactivity and decay heat depend on the target material. Large differences occur mainly for those materials where the thermal neutron activation is the dominant factor. • Contribution of moderators and reflector has to be accounted since the early design phase. • Analysis of the differences obtained by using various tools to be continued. daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 16
Backup daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 17
Details in modeling Hg target H*(10) [mSv h-1] daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 18
Backup daniela.ene@ess.se SATIF 2010 CERN, Geneva 2-4 of June 2010 19