270 likes | 394 Views
Overview and requirements of the 2005 Energy Policy Act and PURPA Standards. Where We Are Today in the United States. Restructured States Regional Transmission Organizations Renewable Portfolio Standards Demand Response Programs EPACT Proceedings. States and Restructured Energy Markets.
E N D
Overview and requirements of the 2005 Energy Policy Act and PURPA Standards
Where We Are Today in the United States • Restructured States • Regional Transmission Organizations • Renewable Portfolio Standards • Demand Response Programs • EPACT Proceedings
States and Restructured Energy Markets Source: Scott Potter, After the Freeze: Issues Facing Some State Regulators as Electric Restructuring Transition Periods End, NRRI Report No. 03-18. (Columbus:NRRI, 2003),updated to December 2005
States With RPS Source: PEW Center on Global Climate Change/ www.pewclimate.org
PURPA key provisions for retail electric utilities & regulatory commissions Sec. 111(a) & (c) – require a determination of whether or not it is appropriate to implement each standard Sec. 111(d) – suggest standards Sec. 112 – outlines the obligations for consideration and the required determinations by state regulatory commissions and non-regulated utilites Sec. 115 – outline special rules for standards and has new provisions relating to time-based metering and communications
EPAct and PURPA – 5 new standards to be considered for electric utilities EPAct Sec. 1251 – Net Metering • PURPA Sec. 111(d)(11) Net Metering • PURPA Sec. 111(d)(12) Fuel Sources/Diversity • PURPA Sec. 111(d)(13) Fossil Fuel Generation Efficiency EPAct Sec. 1252 – Smart Metering • PURPA Sec. 111(d)(14) Time-Based Metering and Communications EPAct Sec. 1254 – Interconnection • PURPA Sec. 111(d)(15) Interconnection
PURPA Procedural Requirements PURPA specifies the procedure requirements for considersation of the standards. Consideration is to be made after public notice and hearing and the determination is to be made (1) in writing, (2) based upon findings and on evidence presented in the hearing, and (3) available to the public (PURPA sec. 111(b)).
EPAct deadlines for Consideration and Determination of New PURPA Standards
Failure to Comply Sec. 112(c) • If the determination deadline for any of the new standrds is not met, consideration and determination regading that standard shall be addressed in the first rate proceeding commenced after August 8, 2008.
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(14)Time-Based Metering and Communications Shall utilities be required to • Offer each of its customer classes certain time-based rate schedules, AND • Provide individual customers, upon request, with a time-based meter capable of enabling time-based service and rates? Section 115(i) . . . And enable other demand response programs
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(14)Time-Based Metering and Communications IF YES 1. Some examples of time-based rates schedules that may be offered are: • Time-of-use pricing • Critical peak pricing • Real-time pricing • Credits for consumers with significant loads 2. The time-based rates shall be determined to be cost-effective. (Boils down to a belief that the long-term value proposition is there to justify or exceed the costs incurred to deploy.)
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(15)Interconnection Shall utilities be required, upon request, to connect on-site customer generation to their distribution systems? IF YES Service, procedures and agreements shall • Promote current best practices of interconnection for distributed generation AND • Be just and reasonable, and not be unduly discriminatory or preferential.
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(11)Net Metering Shall utilities be required to make available, upon request, net metering services? Allowing energy to be delivered to the utility’s system From eligible on-site customer generation To offset the energy the utility provides to that customer
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(12)Fuel Sources (Fuel Diversity) Shall utilities be required to develop a plan To minimize dependence on one fuel source, AND To ensure that the electric energy it sells is generated using a diverse range of fuels and technologies including renewables?
PURPA Sec. 111(d)(13)Fossil Fuel Generation Efficiency Shall utilities be required to develop and implement a 10-year plan to increase the efficiency of its fossil fuel generation?
PURPA Sec. 111(d), (e) and (f)Exemptions for prior state actions, IF • The State has implemented a comparable standard, • The State commission or relevant non-regulated electric utility has conducted a proceeding to consider implementation of a comparable standard, OR The state legislature has voted on the implementation of a comparable standard. However, the prior state action relative to Sec 111(d)(14), Time-based metering is to have been within the previous 3 years.
PURPA Procedural Requirementsbeyond just deadlines Sec 111(a) Consideration and Determination Each State regulatory authority (with respect to each electric utility for which it has rate-making authority) and each non-regulated electric utility shall consider each standard established by subsection (d) and make a determination concerning whether or not it is appropriate to implement such standard to carry out the purposes of this title. … Nothing in this subsection prohibits any state regulatory authority or non-regulated electric utility from making any determination that it is not appropriate to implement any such standard, pursuant to its authority under otherwise applicable State law.
PURPA Procedural Requirementsbeyond just deadlines Sec 111(b) Procedural requirements for consideration and determination • The consideration referred to in subsection (a) shall be made after public notices and hearing. The determination referred to in subsection (a) shall be • In writing • Based upon findings included in such determination and upon the evidence presented at the hearing and • Available to the public
PURPA Procedural Requirementsbeyond just deadlines Sec 111(c) Implementation (2) If a State regulatory authority (with respect to each electric utility for which it has ratemaking authority) or non-regulated electric utility declines to implement any standard established by subsection (d) which is determined under subsection (a) to be appropriate to carry out the purposes of this title, such authority or non-regulated electric utility shall state in writing the reasons therefore. Such statement of reasons shall be available to the public.
PURPA Procedural Requirementsbeyond just deadlines Sec 112(a) Request for consideration and determination In undertaking such consideration and making such determination in any such proceeding . . ., a State regulatory authority (with respect to an electric utility for which it has ratemaking authority) or non-regulated electric utility may take into account in such proceeding • Any appropriate prior determination with respect to such standard, AND • The evidence upon which such prior determination was based (if such evidence is referenced in such proceeding).
What is Epact 2005? Epact 2005 is . . . A National Energy Policy A Philosophy An Opportunity What we make of it.
Messages for Regulators EPAct is about infrastructure investment with technology advancement • Therefore AMI (technology advancement) must be incrementally recovered or infrastructure will suffer. Regulators define the ‘what’, utilities define the ‘how’ • Policy makers cannot become involved in the technology choice. Set the policy. Define the ‘What’, Utilities define the ‘How’. AMI is the enabler of the future ‘smart grid’ • AMI isn’t just meter reading. It’s vision into the network at the lowest level that will change the way utilities do virtually everything over time. Market transformation will take time • It will take at least 10 years for a major portion of the market to fully implement. Realistic expectations and requirements must be maintained as the industry begins this transition.
Messages for Regulators We’re here to help
State Progress 39 States have active or complete EPAct 2005 section 1252 docketed proceedings at this time. Regulatory 1 Negative – Virginia (no need for smart metering) 7 Positive – California, Texas both official support for incremental cost recovery. Arkansas, Ohio (prelim), Oregon (prelim), Louisiana, Connecticut (prelim). Legislative No negative 2 Positive – California and Texas 19 states have pending legislation (Over 6000 pages of state legislation proposed for energy) Majority include positive AMI support.
Key New Federal Events Senate & House Democratic Majority Senate Finance Committee forms new energy subcommittee to be led by Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D) that is also the majority leader of the Senate Energy Committee FERC reports and subsequent statements fully support DR and Smart Metering. Governmental building mandate could be expedited (2011 to 2009) All top tier presidential candidates have placed energy as top issue, with at least half referencing efficiency, DR or smart metering specifically.
Key Federal Events A short “placeholder” bill (S.6) was filed and addressed by both Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Bingaman made a floor statement saying that the Senate had five goal areas: (1) Transportation efficiency (2) Global Warming (3) Energy Efficiency and Technologies (4) Reduce price burdens on consumers and (5) eliminate tax giveaways and price gouging. Number 3 is notable for its inclusion of energy distribution; the full text of Bingaman’s statement on this goal is as follows: “The third goal in the bill is to diversify and expand our use of secure, efficient and environmentally friendly energy supplies and technologies. Efficiency is a key element in our energy policy that deserves more attention in this Congress than we have been able to give it before. There are outstanding opportunities to reduce the demands of our future energy system by being more efficient and effective in the ways we distribute and use energy. I will not go into those at this point except to say that this is going to be a major focus of our work in the first few months.”(Emphasis added)
Key Federal Events Bingaman also stated his prediction that instead of seeing just one big energy bill that the Senate would address these issues “through multiple bills that move through the Senate as issues and proposals for addressing these issues become ripe for action”. Reid echoed Bingman’s remarks about multiple bills instead of one big energy bill. Senator Cantwell (other leading voice in energy issues) supported concept of multiple, specific, smaller bills for energy legislation rather than one big bill. New Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, also addressed substance and renewed her commitment to include energy in the “First 100 Hours” activities of the House.