1 / 37

High Precision Spectrometers project in CMS Krzysztof Piotrzkowski ( UCLouvain /CERN)

High Precision Spectrometers project in CMS Krzysztof Piotrzkowski ( UCLouvain /CERN). Introduction & Motivation HPS concept and staging HPS240 case. Workshop on Diffractive and Electromagnetic Processes at the LHC , 4 -8 January 2010, ECT*, Trento. FP420. New forward detectors:.

sanjiv
Download Presentation

High Precision Spectrometers project in CMS Krzysztof Piotrzkowski ( UCLouvain /CERN)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High Precision Spectrometers project in CMSKrzysztof Piotrzkowski (UCLouvain/CERN) Introduction & Motivation HPS concept and staging HPS240 case Workshop on Diffractive and Electromagnetic Processes at the LHC, 4-8 January 2010, ECT*, Trento

  2. FP420 New forward detectors: Brief history: May’05: R&D proposal acknowledged by LHCC June’08: FP420 Report Fall’08: Proposals to CMS/ATLAS In 2009: Adding detectors @ 220/240 m FP420 JINST 4 (2009) T10001 K. Piotrzkowski

  3. Exclusive Higgs bosons at LHC Main motivation for FP420 Higgs kinematics fully reconstructed with forward detectors! Access to Higgs mass and quantum numbers. Brief history: Białas & Peschanski ’96 Albrow & Rostovtsev ’00 Khoze et al. ’02 SM Higgs signal statistically limited, larger for MSSM case:

  4. HPS: Motivation • Light Higgs boson case is compelling more than ever – exclusive production provides unique information: • Higgs quantum numbers (spin-parity filter) • Direct & precise H mass measurement (event-by-event); MH resolution of  2 GeV direct limits on Higgs width • Possibility of detecting H bb mode • Detection of SM Higgs boson requires (very) large luminosity (sobs  0.1-0.2fb) and challenging timing detectors to keep backgrounds low (S/B1:2); in case of BSM physics HPS could provide discovery channels for Higgs bosons • In addition, HPS offers access to ‘guaranteed’ and unique studies like electroweak physics in two-photon interactions, or new QCD phenomena in exclusive production, for example. K. Piotrzkowski

  5. Observation of Exclusive Charmonium Production and gg → μ+μ- in pp Collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV K. Piotrzkowski

  6. K. Piotrzkowski More tomorrow…

  7. Two-photon physics MSSM: 100 fb-1 (no pileup) arXiv:0908.2020 Large rates for WW HPS240 only range More tomorrow…

  8. Optimal places for tagging Central Exclusive Production (CEP) at LHC: @ 220/240m and 420m from IP HECTOR: JINST 2, P09005 (2007) For nominal low-b LHC optics K. Piotrzkowski

  9. Forward proton detectors @ 420 m • Installation of Si detectors in cryogenic region of LHC, i.e. cryostat redesign needed • Strict space limitations rule out Roman Pot technology, use movable beampipe instead • Radiation hardness required of Si is comparable to those at SLHC, use novel 3-D Silicon technology • To control pile-up background use very fast timing detectors (s ~ 10ps) Acceptance: (At nominal LHC β* = 0.5 m) 0.002 < ξ < 0.02 Two detector stations per arm (4 in total): each station contains tracking and timing detectors K. Piotrzkowski

  10. Moving Hamburg pipe concept Successfully used at HERA: Robust and simple design, + easy access to detectors Motorization and movement control to be cloned from LHC collimator design K. Piotrzkowski

  11. Moving pipe: Detector ‘pockets’ In preparation for beam tests: Thin 300 mm entrance and side windows by electro-erosion K. Piotrzkowski

  12. Hamburg moving beam pipe prototype UCLouvain • Two pockets laser welded ready for test beam

  13. Picosecond ToF detectors At nominal luminosity event rate so high @ FP420 that accidental overlays (= interesting event in central detector + two protons from single diffraction) become major background! Use very fast ToF detectors to reduce it by matching z-vertex from central tracking with z-by-timing from proton arrival time difference: LHC vertex spread is ~50 mm to reduce significantly backgrounds one needs ~10 ps time resolutions (  2 mm z-vertex resolution)! • Developed very fast timing detectors: Cerenkov radiators + fastest MCP-PMTs • Very challenging environment  pushing MCP-PMT performances to the limits: • High event rates, up to several MHz • Running MCP-PMTs close to maximal anode currents • Large annual total collected anode charges (~10 C/cm2!) • GasToF: Gas (C4F10) Cerenkov detector with very fast light pulse (< 1 ps!)  resolution limited by TTS of MCP-PMTs and electronics • Quartic: Quartz based Cerenkov with fine segmentation – multi-hit capability • Going beyond requires new ideas: sub-picosecond streak cameras?? K. Piotrzkowski

  14. GasToF: Cosmic-ray tests Resolution < 20 ps for 1 p.e.! K. Piotrzkowski

  15. Proton fluence at FP420 HECTOR Very high fluence due to protons in single diffraction: Distribution of protons @ FP420 in lateral plane: • Small area detectors needed (~several cm2) • At nominal luminosity large event rates expected ~10 MHz !! • Total fluence of protons > 1015 / cm2 K. Piotrzkowski

  16. Reconstruction: Chromacity grids HECTOR • Basic principle: • Three initial variables(position+angle+energy) and two measured (position+angle) assume nominal vertex position (x=0) • (Horizontal and vertical planes independent) • In each arm (and plane) position and angle @ HPS give energy loss and scattering angle @ IP • 10 mm per point and ~10 m lever arm results in about 2.10-4 energy resolution! K. Piotrzkowski

  17. Calibration with exclusive di-muons CMS thesis: X. Rouby ~ 700  events in 100 pb-1 (single-interaction data @ 14TeV) pp  pp l+l- • Nearly pure QED process • Calibration/alignment of FP420 detectors • (about 40% protons detected!): • Expected resolution of x=Eg/E is ~5.10-6 ! Calibration procedure itself can be very well controlled using Upsilon signal! BOTTOMLINE: Exclusive low-mass dimuons crucial for FP420 K. Piotrzkowski

  18. Forward proton acceptance @ b* = 0.5 m HECTOR: JINST 2, P09005 (2007) To detect forward protons for CEP of light Higgs (Mh ~ 120 GeV) one needs FP420 detectors; Note: Acceptance is mostly driven by energy loss NOT scattering angle (pT) HPS240 essential for triggering + efficiency for HPS240+HPS420 ~ 2 x HPS420 only K. Piotrzkowski

  19. HPS proposal: Adding HPS240 detectors • Tagging at 420m and 240(220)m is complementary – together ~ 0.2-10% energy loss range is covered ! • This leads to significantly higher tagged cross sections • Both 220 and 240 m locations are ‘warm&free’ – just bare beam-pipes • At IP5, locations at 220 m are occupied by TOTEM -> go 240m (as ALFA in ATLAS) - it is still possible to send triggers to CMS! • One does not need to modify the LHC beamline -> can be done before HPS420 and be treated as a proof-of-principle project (= use FP420 detector concepts) + interesting physics with HPS240 only !! K. Piotrzkowski

  20. HPS acceptance with newest LHC optics b* = 0.55 m N. Schul & J. de Favereau Note: 2 and 4 mm approach assumed for HPS 240 and 420 (introduce some shadowing) K. Piotrzkowski

  21. HPS acceptance with newest LHC optics b* = 0.55 m Note: Acceptance for pp  pXp changes when central system X is constrained - here |rapidity(X)| < 1.5 N. Schul & J. de Favereau Using two-photon spectra! Realistic case: 2.5 mm approach of HPS240 and 0.5 mm dead edge (=2mm physical approach) K. Piotrzkowski

  22. LHC beam-line close to 240 m TOTEM Available space of ~12 m! • From Detlef: • Space above quench resistors (QRs) is not reserved yet • Space between QR and beam pipe ~ 25 cm, and space between QRs ~ 50 cm • No problem of heat load K. Piotrzkowski

  23. Taken on 14/1/2009 CMS Q6 ~240m from IP5 Quench resistors To alcove K. Piotrzkowski

  24. HPS420 ~250m K. Piotrzkowski

  25. HPS: Staging HPS requires original and challenging detector solutions – novel mechanical concept (= moving pipe 1st used at HERA) + pico-second resolution ToF detectors HPS420 detectors are essential for Higgs detection but require significant LHC beam-line modification (2 New Connection Cryostats for Point 5)  long shutdowns and significant costs HPS240 detectors are important since can provide L1 signals and installation require minimal intervention to LHC (NB: HPS detectors are ‘like’ a couple of new collimators, among 100…) Stage 0: Proof-of-principle experiment In close collaboration with LHC groups develop moving pipes ready for installation @240 m; test ToF detectors + associated electronics K. Piotrzkowski

  26. HPS: Staging Stage 0: Proof-of-principle experiment Demonstrate in-situ performance of timing detectors (resolutions, resistance to backgrounds, etc) ; learn to operate near-beam detectors; characterize backgrounds etc. Stage 1: HPS240 for CMS Add simple trackers based on CMS barrel pixels + L1 trigger detectors; after integration of all detectors into CMS DAQ start unique studies – search for exclusive production of SUSY pairs, stringent tests of SM gauge boson sector, for example . Stage 2: Final HPS configuration Hunt for exclusive Higgs can start using ultimate detectors – new trackers and timing detectors (Note HPS stage 2 as ‘test-bench’ for CMS phase 2 DAQ/tracker + HPS420 in L1 is possible in phase 2!) K. Piotrzkowski

  27. Stage 0 and 1 for HPS240 • Stage 0/1: As final stage of moving pipe R&D install (in 2011?) first station with fast timing detectors + position hodoscopes • Stage 1: After HPS approval, install two HPS240 stations (in 2012-13?) with tracking based on modified CMS pixel sensors • Note: Good resolution in energy loss expected already for rather poor detectors – eg. For 100 um spatial resolution expect about 2% energy resolution for a 300 GeV loss! • Essential exercise for the final HPS design – handling of backgrounds, operation aspects + first (tagged) physics • First bremsstrahlung measurement in pp (HPS240 +ZDC) – large cross-section – can use for fast calibration of BOTH ZDC and HPS240 (?) • NOTE: Stage 1 HPS is low cost project – can be done ‘quickly’ ! K. Piotrzkowski

  28. LHC Plans as announced at HCP conference, Evian, Nov 20 K. Piotrzkowski

  29. LHC Plans as announced at HCP conference, Evian, Nov 20 K. Piotrzkowski

  30. Summary/Outlook • CMS HPS is (rather) small but very challenging project at the LHC • The FP420 R&D report published, is basis of the HPS proposal • • The R&D (first) phase ends with a complete new connection cryostat design and a pre-prototyped, tested concepts for high precision near-beam detectors at LHC • • Physics case for forward proton tagging spans the central exclusive • Production (exclusive di-jets and Higgs boson!) and ggand photon-proton physics; • If running early enough (stage 1!) give access to diffractive physics, gap survival /underlying event studies….. • • For relatively low incremental cost, forward proton detectors add significant physics potential to CMS with no effect on the operation of the LHC. • You Are Welcome to Join K. Piotrzkowski

  31. Extra slides K. Piotrzkowski

  32. HPS acceptance with newest LHC optics b* = 0.55 m N. Schul & J. de Favereau Using two-photon spectra! Note: 2mm approach introduce some shadowing of HPS420 K. Piotrzkowski

  33. HPS acceptance with newest LHC optics b* = 0.55 m Note: Acceptance changes when central system X is constrained - here |rapidity(X)| < 1.5 K. Piotrzkowski

  34. 2.5 mm approach no dead edge K. Piotrzkowski

  35. SUSY case with pileup Contribution to SUSY’09 arXiv:0910.0202 [hep-ph]

  36. (Light) SUSY case arXiv:0806.1097 [hep-ph] Forward detectors crucial for kinematics reconstruction (charged dilepton states only!): Unique contribution! HPS240 accepts about 50% events !!

  37. Supersymmetric signals at high L N. Schul at SUSY’09: Assume 10 ps resolution on each proton K. Piotrzkowski

More Related