250 likes | 359 Views
Władysław Majewski ISOC Poland, president. Members and Chapters. Member's contributions. Participation in debates regarding goals and tasks Personal engagement in tasks' implementation Leading by example Promotion of ideas Marketing of goals and tasks
E N D
Władysław Majewski ISOC Poland, president Members and Chapters
Member's contributions • Participation in debates regarding goals and tasks • Personal engagement in tasks' implementation • Leading by example • Promotion of ideas • Marketing of goals and tasks • Contribution of members' special abilities • A monetary contribution (local and global fees)
Members' rights and expectations • Admirable and trusted leadership • Clear message about mission, goals and tasks • Clear, stable and followed rules and procedures • Right to speak, to be heard and to be answered • Open debate about goals and performance • Reliable and transparent financial governance • Open disclosure of conflicts of interest • Proper representation
Rights and expectations Admirable and trusted leadership Clear message Right to be heard and answered Open debate Transparent financial governance Representation Disclosure of conflicts of interest more specific analysis will follow Global membership Contribution • Participation in debates • Engagement in implementation • Leading by example • Promotion of ideas • Marketing for goals and tasks • Contribution of special abilities • Local fees and donations • Direct global fees and donations more specific analysis will follow
Rights and expectations Admirable and trusted leadership Clear message Right to be heard and answered Open debate Transparent financial governance Representation Disclosure of conflicts of interest more specific analysis will follow Organizational members Contribution • Participation in debates • Engagement in implementation • Leading by example • Promotion of ideas • Marketing for goals and tasks • Contribution of special abilities • Local fees and donations • Direct global fees and donations more specific analysis will follow
Rights and expectations Admirable and trusted leadership Clear message Right to be heard and answered Open debate Transparent financial governance Representation Disclosure of conflicts of interest more specific analysis will follow Proposed individual members Contribution • Participation in debates • Engagement in implementation • Leading by example • Promotion of ideas • Marketing for goals and tasks • Contribution of special abilities • Local fees and donations • Direct global fees and donations more specific analysis will follow
Expectations To be asked, heard and answered To be invited and included into global and regional projects Clear rules for grant application and common projects Leadership for multinational projects and activities Organizational, technical, marketing and political support if needed and requested – see next slide about the principle od subsidiarity Chapters Tasks • Local activities and projects • Leadership by example • Marketing of goals and tasks • Promotion of standars and ideas • Local debates • Political lobbing for standards' implementation • Direct contact with members • Local internet services and membership management
Nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization. http://www.acton.org/publicat/randl/article.php?id=200 The principle of subsidiarity
Back to realitySome specific practical proposalsmembership and fees
Membership management • Single point of contact and user interface for global and local membership management • Basic local task • Local language, address and title formats • Local personal contact with members including newsletters and messages • Knowledge about member's contributions, achievements and social position • Participation in local activities • Fees collection by local bank in local currency = lower transaction costs • Global services should be subsidary to local • A database interface is a primary way of data exchange in both directions • Centralised user interface for members feasible only as a last resort
Unified membership status • No separate “local” and “global” membership • Personal activity is a most important contribution • Chapters know their members (and their record) • It is reasonable to require: • some experience – for example one year of “associate” status • some personal contribution to grant full voting membership • Fees are complementary to personal activity and cannot subsitute for it
Basic fees • Required • to periodically confirm a will to maintain membership • can be waived in case of verified hardship • locally affordable • should cover cost of: • Membership management (local is cheaper) • Marketing and promotion of membership (local task) • Members' benefits (local ones are cheaper and more desirable) • Collection and handling of fees (local is much cheaper)
Premium fees • Required for premium benefits (local and global) • Conference discounts • Printed materials, CDs and DVDs • Personal promotion • Advisory and consulting services • Honorary titles and social benefits (meetings, dinners etc) • Possibility to monetary support chosen projects • No voting privilidges for sale
Fees distribution • Fees should be left to chapters • Virtually all costs related to fees are local • No need for an employed “global membership director” • No need for a rented global “membership management system” • Incentive for chapters to promote and maintain membership • Chapters depend on fees; for global ISOC fees are a marginal source • Local management of fees in local banks and currency is much cheaper • Fees can used by chapters as their contribution for projects. It is important in case of grant applications • Fees can be used to fund regional cooperation of chapters • If international money transfer is necessary - it is cheaper and easier to do it three or four times a year between chapter's and ISOC's account
Chapters and representations • Voting members of chapters should have voting privilidges equal to all other individual members • ISOC BoT should specify minimal requirements for status of voting chapter's member • Seperate representation of chapters reflects chapters' organizational knowledge, competence and position in their respective communities. It should not replace and substitute for representation of individual members
Organizational members' fees • Each organizational member of global ISOC • should contribute to at least one chapter as its organizational member • Pillar/project chosen by donor should get up to 50% of contribution • Other half of contribution should be used for needs chosen by ISOC • Organizational members of chapters should be able to get some recognition on global level (including info on chapter's page on isoc.org) for reasonable additional fee no exceeding 50% of required local contribution • Complimentary membership given to organizational members should be equal in rights and requirement to standard ISOC and chapters' membership
Organizational membership • ISOC is no more dependent only on organizational members' contribution • Need for separate class of membership and representation for org members is reduced • Organizational members should have voting power primarily by votes of individual ISOC members recommended and supported by them • Organizational members should be able to influence projects supported by them
Services for members • Responsibility delegated to chapters if possible • Outsourced only if no available from internal resources, chapters, volunteering members or contributing organizational members • No fixed costs on global level • No dedicated staff • No rented management system
Plea • Please restart the whole process of defining individual membership from scratch • Let enough time for position presentation by all affected parties and for debate • Work hard and openly for compromise • Ensure that all proposed terms and solutions are well understood before decision is declared and implemented Restart is cheaper than another schizm
Projects and grants • Clear and stable rules for: • soliciding of proposals • Requirements for proposals • Prefferences for proposals • Evaluation of proposals and choice of experts • Evaluation of project performance • No single dollar for project chosen by discretionaly decision of ISOC President or staff
Participation in debates • No policy declared without global debate. Prerogatives and tasks of VP for policy include initiation and moderation of debate. No more “software patents” policy declared without previous debate. • Rules for topics identification and scheduling • Time for translation of position documents and local debate • All parties invited to present their position • Limited number (4-6) global debates each year • Each debate summarized by moderator • Each debate should lead to published position or applicable practical proposals
Promotion and marketing • Promotion of open standards • Translation of standards • Canon of promotional and explanatory documents which must or should be available languages • Standard ISOC leaflets ready to translation • International RSS feed with editing access for trusted members from several regions, countries and cultures
Leading by example • ISOC needs examplary internet communication competence and facilities • Accessability • Standard compliance • Distributed content management and information distribution system • No more “we lack a competence to effectively distribute our own policy document” drama
Leadership • ISOC President, VPs and BoT members must: • maintain regular, scheduled meeting and visits in different regions and countries • Regularly, personally and actively participate in internet debates by mailing lists, forums and instant communicators • Regularly communicate their papers, positions, suggestions and calls for action If communication with members is a waste of time for you - please find other field of activity