1 / 8

Text pTrees (e.g., Tweets) 1. DpTrees (indexed by (T,P) )

Text pTrees (e.g., Tweets) 1. DpTrees (indexed by (T,P) ).

sarahsolomon
Download Presentation

Text pTrees (e.g., Tweets) 1. DpTrees (indexed by (T,P) )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Text pTrees(e.g., Tweets) 1. DpTrees (indexed by (T,P) ) Best approach? Compose a historical TBHG (deep and wide) TrainingSet, TS(stock,day,.) containing a column for every pertinent Wall Street and Main Street input (e.g., Russia invades Kiev!) on each stock on each day. Class label: increased/decreased (by a threshold % the next day?). Build a Hulls around the “increased” and “decreased’ classes. Classify each stock each day. Buy increasers on margins. Sell decreasers short. A SA column would be a pertinent Wall Street measurement column. Term 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 … 3 9 5 5 6 6 D D 9 7 7 … … … Tweet3 Tweet3 .Docs .Docs Tweet2 Tweet2 Tweet1 Tweet1 2 2 2 1 1 1 Pos Term Pos buy buy always. apple always. apple an AAPL April April AAPL an and all are are all and Sentiment analysis, SA on small datasets (yesterday’s AAPL tweets) w NLP. A new SA signal which is faster/more_accurate/uses_vertical_data? Position info for phrase analysis, but then pTrees are not necessary 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DTPtf bitsliced gives multiple binary DataCubes One can use any measurement or data structure of measurements, e.g., DTPtfidf in which each cell has a decimal tfidf measurement, which can be bitsliced directly into whole number bitslices plus fractional bitslices (one for each binary digit to the right of the binary point-no need to shift!). In all cases we have 1 or more bitslice DTP bianry cubes (fro DTPe we have only the units bitslice) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DTPe expressed as TpTreeSet index (D,P) Positions 1 2 … 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tweet3 Tweet2 Tweet1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DTPe as k=1..3 PT Rolodex Cards DTPe as k=1..9 PD Rolodex Cards DTPe expressed as a Term Table: Term P1D1 P1D2 P1D3...P7D1…P7D3 PT card D=k k=1,2,3 1 1 0 1 ... 0 … 0 . . . 9 0 … 0 . . . 1 … 1 Use DTPe DataCube when doing Data Warehousing Use DTPe DocTbl for Doc Classification/Clustering Use DTPe TD Rolodex Card when doing TD relationship ARM, etc. DTPe DT expressed as DpTreeSet indexed by (T,P)) Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DTPe as a Document Table: Doc T1P1…T1P7 . . . T9P1…T9P7 DTPe DocTermPos existential Data Cube DTPtf DocTermPos termfrequency Data Cube DTPe as k=1..7 TD Rolodex Cards 0 0 Term 1 1 … 0 . . . 0 … 0 PD card T=k k=1..9 TD card P=k k=1..7 ... Terms ... Terms 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 buy DTPe expressed as Position Table Pos T1D1 T1D2 T1D3...T9D1…T9D3 0 . . . 0 2 0 … 0 . . . 1 … 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 . . . 0 . . . 3 0 … 0 . . . 1 … 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 . . . 1 1 0 1 ... 0 … 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . . . 1 . . . AAPL . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . all 7 0 … 0 . . . 1 … 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tweet3 Tweet2 Tweet1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 . . . always 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Term buy DTPe as PpTreeSet index (T,D) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . an 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 . . . 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 . . . and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 . . . 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 . . . apple 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . April 7 7 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Position 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . are

  2. A2564 256 Documents (AAPL tweets), 29 Positions, 296 Terms) (Always set the Stride to a multiple of the register size!) 1 $ZAGG 2 $VZ 3 $VHC 4 $T 5 $SIMO 6 $RIMM 7 $OVTI 8 $NFLX 9 $JCP 10 $IDTI 11 $HLF 12 $HIVE 13 $GLUU 14 $FORD 15 $CTRL 16 $BIDU 17 $BABA 18 $AMZN 19 $AAPL 20 you 21 yesterday 22 year. 23 Xiaomi's 24 wrong! 25 World 26 win 27 week 28 Wedge 29 Wedbush 30 wearable 31 Watch 32 very 33 Verizion 34 usual 35 upgrade 36 up 37 unit 38 TV 39 trial 40 trading 41 traction 42 Topeka 43 top 44 tonite 45 tomorrow 46 told 47 today 48 times 49 Time 50 thinks 51 they 52 there 53 their 54 tgt 55 teardown 56 target..why 57 target 58 taking 59 sure 60 suing 61 stream$AAPL 62 store 63 stock 64 Stellar 65 Stanley) 66 Sr. 67 Square 68 spoke 69 speaking 70 Sources 71 soon 72 site 73 side 74 showing 75 Show 76 shots 77 shop 78 several\ 79 service. 80 Sell 81 sell 82 scurrying 83 Schack 84 Says 85 says 86 saying 87 Samsung 88 sales 89 said 90 sabbatical 91 RT 92 rexxam 93 retract 94 retail 95 resgined 96 reports 97 reporting 98 reiterated 99 reit 100 REIT 101 Redog.great 102 Redog 103 raising 104 raises 105 Put 106 products 107 proceed 108 price 109 pretty 110 presenting 111 prepping 112 predictions 113 PR 114 potential). 115 potential 116 poor 117 Pipers 118 phones 119 Phison 120 Perhing 121 people 122 pay 123 Partners 124 own 125 out 126 ouch!! 127 OTR 128 opening 129 NYU 130 now 131 note 132 not 133 no 134 nite 135 nice 136 next 137 news. 138 new 139 New 140 Need 141 Munster 142 Multiple 143 movie 144 Morgans 145 Monday 146 Mobile 147 Mkts 148 Minster 149 mid 150 Markets 151 making 152 LQMT 153 Lotta 154 Looks 155 looking 156 long? 157 link 158 line 159 likely 160 like 161 LG 162 level 163 less 164 later 165 language 166 Korea 167 key\ 168 Katy 169 JPM 170 JP 171 journalism 172 jefferies 173 Jefferies 174 JCP 175 iWatch 176 isnt 177 is 178 iphone 179 iPhone 180 initating 181 indicating 182 Huberty 183 http://t.co/SXzX 184 http://t.co/Ny6D 185 http://t.co/jZVU 186 http://t.co/fuCh 187 Holly 188 highlighted 189 highlight 190 high 191 harsh 192 Hallum 193 guys 194 great 195 good 196 going 197 Global 198 Glad 199 Gilford. 200 get 201 Gene 202 gap 203 gain 204 future 205 follow\ 206 follow 207 focusing 208 flow 209 find 210 Expect 211 event 212 essentially 213 engineer 214 Employees 215 Electronics 216 early 217 down 218 double 219 documents 220 dividend 221 defense 222 defending 223 defended 224 deal 225 days 226 day 227 CY 228 custy 229 Craig 230 controller 231 Consumer 232 confirming 233 confident 234 conference 235 comp. 236 comments 237 come 238 CNBC 239 cloud 240 citing 241 check 242 cheap 243 chart 244 CEO 245 ceo 246 case\ 247 Capital 248 Cap 249 calls 250 call 251 buy 252 Buy 253 bulls 254 bull 255 bubbles!! 256 Bill 257 bigger 258 big 259 believe 260 belief 261 Barclays 262 Bad 263 back 264 AT&T 265 astute 266 associates 267 asking 268 around 269 Are 270 Apple 271 Apple 272 Another 273 analyst 274 Amazon 275 alarm 276 ago 277 again 278 admits 279 added 280 Activatrions 281 activations 282 activated 283 Ackman 284 Ackman 285 AAPL’s 286 910 287 65 288 64bit 289 4.3M 290 2015 291 126 292 115 293 1111 294 1001 295 1000 296 0.54% 175 6 7 8 9 180 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 190 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 210 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 220 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 230 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 240 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 250 1 2 3 4 5 256 $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into 2015 T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into 2015 T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Time : 2014-11-Retweets:6 Favourit:0 User : Marc Lehman Follower:20502} Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into 2015 T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in 88 9 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 110 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 130 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 150 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 170 1 2 3 174 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of $135.00 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015 but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in 2015 Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into 2015 T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into 2015 T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015 but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015 but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 /c Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of $135.00 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of $135.00 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Time : 2014-11-Retweets:6 Favourit:0 User : Marc Lehman Follower:20502} Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015 but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (i Watch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of $135.00 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 87 big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (i Watch potentia $VHC reiteratBuy and 65 target @ Gilford.Expect $AAPL trial to proceed and confidenthat $VHC will win Glad to be back from my sabbaticgreat calls around today $HLF $AAPL etc etc... Multiple$AAPL key\ Sr. Employeeresginedysdy check out this flow chart http://t- no alarm but never good. JP Morgans upgrade on $OVTI today is essentiaconfirmiwhat we had days ago with $AAPL I Phone 5 wins JPM admits they got it wrong! $AAPL Im told Topeka Cap Mkts has a note out reit 1111 tgt defendinthe stock and saying its down on poor journaliand cheap shots ha @RedDogT$AAPl grt trading as usual Redog Topeka Capital Markets that had the 1001 $AAPL target is out raising it again to a street high of 1111 this is grt $AAPL defendednow @ Topeka saying AT&T iPhone ActivatiNeed to be Put into Perspectreit 1001 tgt I spoke to soon Pipers Gene Munster reit 910 tgt on $AAPL not focusingon I phone activatibut on top line sales and future products $AAPL bulls scurryinto find Gene Minster to come on CNBC for a defense on this missed activatifrom $VZ and $T $AAPL not good - jefferiesaying that $T activate4.3M i phones in q1 less than the 6M expectatouch!! Verizionactivatidown also @RedDogTnice trading Redog.grfollow in the stream$A @RedDogTAre you looking for a big gap down tomorrow$AAPL any level tomorrowon a gap down to get long? $JCP - Bill Ackman Perhing Square is speakingnow NYU Schack REIT conferensays that JCP poised to rebound with new ceo from $AAPL - LQMT + Korea times is reportinthat LQMT is likely to be in AAPL's New iphone 5 http://t\n http://t Lotta people asking for the $FORD $AAPL link here it is - http://t Stellar early call on $AAPL by Wedge Partners : 2012-04- '/c $FORD deal w $AAPL iphone productson their site @StockSa@allstat$RIMM associatthere tonite and $AAPL sales guys there tomorrownite for the OKC game. LBJ needs to lite it up @StockSa@JasonRavery astute shop the call will gain tractionim sure in a little bit re $AAPL Holly bubbles!Topeka Capital Markets initatin$AAPL with a 1001 price target..not 1000 tgt whats his point $AAPL I'm sure this is going to be highlighMonday Ex Apple TV engineerdisses firm's post-SteJobs design sense\nh $ZAGG presentitomorrow@ Wedbush conferenmid day $AAPL event tomorrowas well..hm( no postion here) C. Hallum reit buy on $SIMO Phison said controllunit sales would double which is + industryWas down on $AAPL suing Android industry Sources indicatithat $AMZN is opening a retail store ie $AAPL to sell Amazon ExlclusiE-readerand Tablets - http://t Jefferieout saying that they believe $AAPL will pay a dividendlater this year. $VHC up on documentshowing that $VHC is suing $AAPL again rexxam of the case RT @TradeHa$AAPL preppingmovie cloud service.Bad for $NFLX ? http://t $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (i Watch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a $10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (i Watch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (i Watch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15 Craig Hallum and OTR Global both very high on $IDTI - citing a big potentiawin at LG and $AAPL (iwatch potentia Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)also has a \ bull case\ on $AAPL and raises to 150 with prior tgt of 135 using a 10 EPS tgt. for CY 2015 Katy Huberty (Morgan Stanley)taking Apple $AAPL target up to 126 from 115 Sell side said $AAPL teardownwont be out till 2015 but belief is that $IDTI won the wirelesschargingsocket. Let the chart guru's chime in Some pretty harsh languagefrom $GLUU - so $AAPL is 0.54% custy of $GLUU . $AAPL is going 64 bit by 15-Feb $GLUU says they aren't going 64bit The bigger highlighis that $BIDU $BABA Samsung and $AAPL \ could follow\ Xiaomi'slead and make a strategimove with $YOD as well Looks like $HIVE had to retract their PR yesterda&amp added that they \ DONATED\in support of $AAPL what scumbagshttp://t Another Sell side analyst making commentson the $HIVE $AAPL news. Says $HIVE isnt worthy of the 50M mkt cap add sees 8M tops hence the fade $CTRL showing up on \ several\sell side reports as a comp. to own into CES &amp for 2015 Home automatia space $AAPL most likely headed into T- Mobile CEO predictifor 2015 - thinks wearables / $AAPL iWatch will be huge http://t $IDTI speakingat Barclaysnext week - ConsumerElectronShow (JAN) - Mobile World Congress- $AAPL iWatch chargingtheme fuego for 15

  3. T 1 P 20 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 3 P 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 3 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 3 P 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 3 P 17 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 4 P 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 4 P 22 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 5 P 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 6 P 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 7 P 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 8 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T 9 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 10 1 21 Of These T 11 P 12 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 12 P 3 1 20 Of These T 12 P 9 1 20 Of These T 12=$HIVE P 13 1 20 Of These T 14 P 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 14 P 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 18 P 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 19=$AAPL P=most 273 of these T1 P 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 15 P 1 1 21 Of These T=20 P=3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 14 1 16 Of These T 16 P 6 1 20 Of These T 13 P 6 1 20 Of These T 13 P 14 1 20 Of These T 13=$GLUU P 23 1 20 Of These T 17 P 7 1 20 Of These T 10=$IDT1 P 15 1 5 Of These T=251 =buy P=4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T=252 =Buy P=3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 A simple Sentiment Analysis strategy 1: Buy stock indicated in documents, DPbuy,4 and Dpbuy,8 (doc=25 and doc=2). Doc2: $VHC reiterated. Buy and 65 target @Gilford. Expect $AAPL trial to proceed and confident that $VHC will win. Doc25: C. Hallum reit buy on $SIMO Phison said control unit sales would double which is + industry. Was down on $AAPL suing Android industry So the strategy would conclude: Buy $VHC and $SIMO. Of course, this is an extremly simple strategy. An important point is that such text mining is the perfect area to demonstrate the facility of multilevel pTrees. What if there are ~1 trillion =~ 240 Documents? Stride= 64=26, we’d have 7 concatenated levels pTrees of 448 bits Stride= 128=27, have 6 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 786 bits Stride= 32=25, have 8 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 256 bits Stride= 16=24, have 10 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 160 bits Stride= 8=23, have 14 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 112 bits Stride= 4=22, have 20 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 40 bits Stride= 2=21, have 40 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 40 bits Stride= 256=28 have 5 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 1,280 bits Stride= 512=29 have 5 levels and Concatenated_pTree_Length = 1,280 bits Stride= 1024=210 have 4 levels & Concatenated_pTree_Length = 4,096 bits Stride= 2048=211 have 4 levels & Concatenated_pTree_Length = 8,192 bits Stride= 4096=212 have 4 levels & Concatenated_pTreeLength = 16,384 bits Stride= 8192=213 have 4 levels & Concatenated_pTree_Length = 32,768 bits Stride=16384=214 have 3 levels & Concatenated_pTree_Length = 49,152 bits Stride=32768=215 have 3 levels & Concatenated_pTree_Length = 98,384 bits Stride= 1,048,576=220 2 level and the Concat_pTree_Length = 2,097,152 bits Stride= 1,099,511,627,776=240 1 level and the pTree Length = 1,099,511,627,776 bits Where is the sweet spot? I like stride=214. Recall # of levels dictates the # of separate interpretation steps (each involving comparisons and IfThenElses…). This comparison assumes a single 1bit in each pTree (true for PpTrees and TpTrees but not DpTrees – witness DpTree$HIVE,2 with 20 1 bits). Also, 1 counting speed is a critical consideration. DpTrees are the only pTrees w multiple 1bits. TpTrees and PpTrees always have<=1 1bits. The depth of a TpTree probably maxes out at 100,000 and a PpTree depth depends on the nature of the document corpus (for tweets, ~256?, for email, ~1000?, for books, 500,0000?, for webpages ~500?). The point is, since TpTrees and PpTrees are relatively so small, does it pay to use multilevel there at all? (e.g., ANDing and Oring 500,000 bit vectors is pretty fast and then there would be no interpretation of segments to do.

  4. A2564 (256 AAPL Tweets, 296 Terms, 29 Pos) PpTrees (Doc1) 2Level, Stride=6 T# T# Concatenate all levels? AND, analyze, count (if multiple 1-bits in a stride, duplicate the next level down (and indicate where dups are by a mask?). Be careful it there is an OR involved though! Actual sizes (not T=296,P=29, D=256) TpTrees 3Level Sri=10 (Doc1) 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 2 5 8 1 6 1 3 1 1 1 4 11 5 2 0 1 3 1 0 5 0 1 7 1 0 9 1 0 10 0 1 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 TpTtrees: 1Lev: T=100K=217bits 248 pTrees. 3Lev: Stri=26=64, 256=28bits  248 pTrees=256 bits (3Lev reduces each pTree by factor of 512. Processing step seldom > ~100s of 248 pTrees) P# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 29 TpTrees (Doc1) P# T# 2 3 5 7 9 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 1 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 223 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 T# Level=1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 1 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 1 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 T# Level=all 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 PpTtrees: 1Lev P=256=28bits 257pTrees =265bits Processing seldom> ~100s of 257 pTrees 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T# Level=0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 DpTtrees: 1Lev D=1T=240b 225 pTrees(=265b 5Levs: Stri=28=256 28b 225 pTrees 5Lev DpTrees reduce each by factor ~232=4B. May be >1 1-bit in each (T,P)DpTree. For most (T,P)s, 0 1-bits. i.e. (T,P)pTree pure0 DpTreeSet is stored in optimal processing form and losslessly as 225=~32,000,000 Levels=5 Strides=64 Concatenated DpTrees. That’s ~235bits = 232bytes = 4B bytes 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 DpTree $VZ,P=20 D# DpTree gap P=8 D# DpTree $ZAGG,P=1 D# DpTrees 2Level, Str=16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 gap P=17 gap P=8 $VZ P=20 $ZAGG P=1 Gene P=6 Gene P=8 conference P=6 conference P=13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 257 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 262 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 266 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 270 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 273 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 276 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 288 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 290 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 295 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 DpTrees 3Level, Str=8 gap P=8 $VZ P=20 $ZAGG P=1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

  5. $HLF $HIVE $GLUU $FORD $CTRL buy buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Doc $ZAGG $VZ $VHC $T $SIMO # buy buy buy buy buy 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 1 1 1 2 26 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 $RIMM $OVTI $NFLX $JCP $IDTI buy buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $BIDU $BABA $AMZN $AAPL buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Here, and on the next slide are the results of a strategy to identify the count of tweets that have the word “buy’ in them along with the stock name. It is intended as decision support, not decision making. The user should take a look at the number of such tweets for each stock, choose those stock that seem to have a high likelihood of positive sentiment and then look at the indicated tweets to confirm and make actual buy choices (human decision making in the end).

  6. Doc $ZAGG $VZ $VHC $T $SIMO # buy buy buy buy buy 131 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 0 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 0 0 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 213 0 0 0 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 215 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 223 0 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 234 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 236 0 0 0 0 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 244 0 0 0 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 247 0 0 0 0 0 248 0 0 0 0 0 249 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 0 252 0 0 0 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 254 0 0 0 0 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 4 3 $RIMM $OVTI $NFLX $JCP $IDTI buy buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 2 44 $ZAGG $VZ $VHC $T $SIMO buy buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 62 62 3 2 $BIDU $BABA $AMZN $AAPL buy buy buy buy 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 22 22 3 271 Since AAPL is taken for granted (all tweets were suppose to be AAPL related), the others rank as follows: Since AAPL is taken for granted (all tweets were suppose to be AAPL related), the others rank as follows: $AAPL 271 $GLUU 62 $HIVE 62 $IDTI 44 $BIDU 22 $BABA 22 $T 4 $VHC 4 $FORD 3 $AMZN 3 $SIMO 3 $HLF 3 $RIMM 3 $NFLX 3 $OVTI 3 $VZ 3 $JCP 2 $CTRL 2 $ZAGG 2

  7. 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 2 b w g u h h b > u i o p i u u 1 y n o g g l d h e l 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The following 22 documents have 2 occurrences of these Positive Sentiment Terms: 2 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 220 231 242 253 None have 3. 112 gave at least 1. Doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256

  8. A2564 (256 AAPL Tweets, 296 Terms, 29 Pos) TpTrees 3Lev Sri=10 D 1 Is the OR of all 7 of these PpTrees. It is pure one down to the end of that document and is therefore unnecessary. PpTrees (Doc1) 2Level, Stri=6 T# T# D 1 Is the OR of all 6 of these TpTrees. It should probably be one level. DP 12 0 1 DP 13 1 0 DP 15 0 1 DP 17 1 0 DP 19 1 0 DP 11 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 2 5 8 1 6 1 3 1 1 1 4 11 5 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 TpTrees (Doc1) P# T# 2 3 5 7 9 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 1 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 P# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 29 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 223 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 1 115 1 0 0 0 0 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 0 0 1 0 0 0 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 173 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 T# Level=1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 26 Is the OR of all PpTrees for T=26 and shows all positions where T=26 occurs in any document. It is probably not useful? P 2 Is the OR of all 256 Doc-indexed TpTrees, ahowing all terms that occur in position=2. Is it useful? It should probably be one level. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T# Level=0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 DpTree gap P=8 D# DpTree $VZ,P=20 D# DpTrees 2Lev Str=16 DpTree $ZAGG,P=1 D# TP G8 A P TP G1 A7 P CP O6 N F E R E C E TP $1 Z A G G TP $2 V0 Z TP G6 E N E TP G6 E N E CP O1 N3 F E R E C E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 70 ... 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 … 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 257 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 261 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 262 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 266 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 269 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 270 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 273 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 276 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 288 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 290 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 293 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 294 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 295 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 DpTrees 3Lev, Str=8 TP $1 Z A G G TP $2 V0 Z TP G8 A P T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 10 P 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 T 10 Is the OR of all 21 T=10,P=1 DpTrees. It should probably be one level. 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 1 These Position indexed DpTrees are always pure one! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

More Related