1 / 14

INTERREG IIIB CADSES „PlanCoast“ Objectives and expected results

INTERREG IIIB CADSES „PlanCoast“ Objectives and expected results. by Bernhard Heinrichs Ministry for Transport, Building and Regional Development M-V, Germany PlanCoast Lead Partner. Content. The challenges Overall Objectives PlanCoast Project Area PlanCoast Structure and Tasks

sarai
Download Presentation

INTERREG IIIB CADSES „PlanCoast“ Objectives and expected results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTERREG IIIB CADSES „PlanCoast“Objectives and expected results by Bernhard Heinrichs Ministry for Transport, Building and Regional Development M-V, Germany PlanCoast Lead Partner

  2. Content • The challenges • Overall Objectives • PlanCoast Project Area • PlanCoast Structure and Tasks • Conclusions so far

  3. 1. The challenges • Growing conflicts among seaside activities • Urgent need for spatial co-ordination of offshore uses

  4. 2. Overall Objective • Strengthen ICZM through spatial planning • Integrate land- and sea-side planning • Exchange experience between Adriatic Sea, Baltic Sea, Black Sea • Support EU maritime strategy

  5. 3. PlanCoast Project Area

  6. WP 1 „Strengthening the role of Spatial planning in ICZM“ • Assessment of status Quo • National reports on current ICZM/Sea Use Planning preconditions • Transnational, comparative study on the role of Spatial Planning in ICZM in the Adriatic, Baltic and Black Sea

  7. WP 2 „Geographical information systems“ • Agreement on common technical basics and set of data • Creation of update of GIS databases

  8. WP 3 „Sea-Use-Planning in Action“ • Preparation of Sea-Use-Plans for several 12 –sm-zone • Sea-Use-Planning training programme for spatial planners from participating countries

  9. Sea Use Planning of the German Baltic Sea

  10. WP 4 „ICZM in Action“ • Preparation or update of several spatial plans according to ICZM principles

  11. WP 5 „Transnational Dissemination“ • Exchange of ICZM Best Practice • Information and lobbying for ICZM

  12. Financing • EFRE 595.000 EUR • CARDS 493.678 EUR • PHARE 334.200 EUR • TACIS 120.600 EUR • EU Financing 1.488.478 EUR • EU Co-Financing + 317.000 EUR • Non EU Co-Financing + 173.542 EUR • Total 1.979.020 EUR

  13. 5. Conclusions so far • Spatial Planning cannot substitute the ICZM-process - but forms an essential part • Spatial planning of the sea should become an integral part of ICZM

More Related