1 / 14

Mid-Run Assessment - ISD

Mid-Run Assessment - ISD. S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006. ISD Priorities: Co-Injection. Contingency. Requested. Assigned. Needed. Priority. Progress on XP603 (2 x 0.5 run days) - Gates. Plot showing improvement in pulse averaged  and pulse length with shaping over narrow range

sarai
Download Presentation

Mid-Run Assessment - ISD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid-Run Assessment - ISD S. Kaye, D. Gates 10 May 2006

  2. ISD Priorities: Co-Injection Contingency Requested Assigned Needed Priority

  3. Progress on XP603 (2 x 0.5 run days) - Gates Plot showing improvement in pulse averaged  and pulse length with shaping over narrow range (for 2006) • Attempted to achieve early H-mode by: • Divert earlier - failed PF1A problem • Larger Ip flat-spot, les dIp/dt - failed • Adjust early gas - failed • Requires higher  early with PF3U/L (a few more shots) • Raised elongation to  = 2.45 (maintained 119991) • Led to record 1MA pulse length (at the time) • After remaining adjustments made push wall conditions to improve confinement • He discharges, Li, B, - no bakeout • Need field and current scan broaden operating space (see Fig.)

  4. XP526: k/d Scans – Effect on Confinement & ELMs (Kaye) • Initial attempt (1 day) unsuccessful • Facility, plasma issues • Spent several hours on 5/2 to develop target • Successful • Will attempt low-d k-scan first, then high-dk-scan, then mid-kd-scan Shot 120423

  5. XP602 run plan status (Menard) Day 1 – 30 shots  need to finish phase scan • Re-obtain long-pulse discharge at 4-4.5kG and IP = 0.8MA  done • Implemented rt-EFIT control of LSN long-pulse shots – took ½ day • Scan ramp-up density to determine MHD locking threshold  started • Scan EFC amp & phase during locking scanned amp, not phase Day 2 – 30 shots  only have 2 shots at lower ne • If EFC enables lower ne operation, reduce ne again (12 shots) • From May 5 data, lower ne delayed early H-mode, shot dev. required • Increase IP to 0.9, 1.0, 1.2MA (18 shots) • Developed a 700kA target via XP614 – obtained info about optimal PNBI Day 3 (1/2 day) – 15 shots  Unlikely to get here this year • Obtain density flat-top in longest-pulse obtained with EFC at 0.8MA • Scan Li deposition to achieve desired pumping for ne control (10 shots) • Increase fueling for constant line-average density = 3e19 m-3 (5 shots)

  6. XP602: Long-pulse development at reduced ne using EFC • Developed shot with 30% lower density early • q-min higher initially even w/ lower heating • EFC used during early phase of shot

  7. XP602: Long-pulse development at reduced ne using EFC • Applying early EFC can increase early plasma rotation • Other shots (120336) show smaller increase Predictive OHxTF EFC on by t=150ms EFC off

  8. Run plan wish-list • Start and finish EFC phase scan • 8 shots • Run @ lower ne  multiple He-cond shots needed? • H-mode threshold strongly affected at lowest ne values • 8-15 shots • Increase IP to 1, 1.2MA • Tested at 700 and 800kA so far • 5-10 shots

  9. XP627 Non-Solenoidal Ip Rampup (Kessel) Examine the replacement of inductive current by non-inductive current in the form of CD and bootstrap current from HHFW and NBI, to determine the efficiency of these sources to rampup the plasma current • Part A: HHFW (1/2 day) • Use k|| = 14 m-1 heating, run at Ip = 250 kA, utilize trip avoidance (power reduction before voltage reaches trip limit) • Use k|| = 10 m-1 heating, co-CD, and cntr-CD, run Ip = 250 kA • Using best phasing result attempt OH clamp • For additional run time attempt lower Ip values (200, 150 kA) for both 14 and 10 m-1 • Part B: NBI (1/2 day) • At Ip = 600 kA, inject A @ 70 keV, inject B @ 70 keV, and inject A+B @ 70 keV • Repeat at Ip = 500 kA • Repeat at Ip = 400 kA • Repeat at Ip = 300 kA • For additional run time try source C @ 70 keV, and sources A and B @ higher energy

  10. Summary of XP627 Part A: HHFW Part A of this XP were run for 1/2 day to examine the effectiveness of HHFW to replace inductive current and provide non-solenoidal plasma current rampup. The experiments used low plasma currents 250-350 kA, isoflux/rtEFIT control of the outer gap for antenna coupling, HHFW powers ranging from 1.2-1.7 MW, and HHFW heating phasing at 14 m-1. Initially there were difficulties getting the plasma control system to function at low Ip, but these were corrected, and reliable discharges were produced, but resulted in the loss of 1/4 day. The HHFW system was choppy at first due to gap control oscillations and non-optimal matching, however, this improved significantly as the matching was tuned. The plasma did enter H-mode in several discharges, however, it did not stay in H-mode, which appears to be correlated to the HHFW power dropping out. The HHFW power required to enter the H-mode is lower than previously observed at these Ip values by about 1.5-2 times, and more work is required to understand the HHFW power and H-mode sustainment.

  11. More Run Time for XP627 Part A: HHFW Lost 1/4 day did not allow the time necessary to get good matching with the antenna, this must be improved to provide longer steady HHFW power input Expand power scan and power trajectory (step up in power) of HHFW to identify reliable entry into H-mode and sustainment of H-mode, including gap adjustments after plasma is in H-mode Extend pulse lengths (to 700 ms) to get HHFW conditioning over long periods (HHFW on at 100 ms and off at 650 ms) Keep plasma current LOW to (250 kA) to make HHFW heating effects strong, unless control issues force Ip to higher values Try intermediate phasing at <k||> = 10 m-1 to see CD and heating effects Have good starting discharge for this work, 120297, with reasonable HHFW antenna matching

  12. Summary of XP627 Part B: NBI Part B of this XP was run for ½ day, examining NBI into low Ip plasmas to establish database for non-solenoidal plasma current rampup. The plasma stored energies under a single NB source reached 120 kJ at 600 kA, 70-90 kJ at 500 kA, and 60 kJ at 400 kA. With 2 NB sources the plasma stored energy reaches 120 kJ at 600 kA, 120 kJ at 500 kA, and 80-90 kJ at 400 kA. With 3 NB sources at 500 kA, the stored energy was 120 kJ, indicating that source C is not well confined at these low Ip values. The li values were 0.75-0.9 at 600 kA, 0.7-0.85 at 500 kA, and 0.85 at 400 kA. The lowest surface voltage was 0.1 V, although more typically across these discharges about 0.2 V. The density regularly exceeded the Greenwald density by about 50% due to the low plasma currents and strong NB fueling. Analysis of the NB characteristics with TRANSP will help to understand the trade-offs of NB confinement vs Ip, bootstrap and NBCD, and single and double source effects. The diminishing returns of NBI for non-solenoidal current rampup are becoming evident at 400 kA, although the easy transitions to H-mode are encouraging.

  13. More Run Time for XP627 Part B: NBI Add source C @ 70 keV to the 2 NB source cases at all currents Examine Ip = 300 kA to find the “cliff” for NB confinement, where it is no longer effective. So far the trend is smooth. Begin NB injection into plasmas at low Ip with HHFW heating (Ip = 500-250 kA) to examine the parasitic absorption effects when Ip is low and the NB is poorly confined. This serves as the transition from the HHFW-only rampup phase to the HHFW+NBI phase

  14. Counter-Injection Campaign Priorities Contingency Requested Assigned Needed Priority

More Related