1 / 18

Map of levels of complexity and indetermination for foresight studies

Map of levels of complexity and indetermination for foresight studies. Javier Medina Vásquez Full Professor, Universidad del Valle Head of the National Program on Technological and Industrial Foresight Colciencias – Colombia

sargent
Download Presentation

Map of levels of complexity and indetermination for foresight studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Map of levels of complexity and indetermination for foresight studies Javier Medina Vásquez Full Professor, Universidad del Valle Head of the National Program on Technological and Industrial Foresight Colciencias – Colombia “Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impact on Policy and Decision-Making”. IPTS, Seville (Spain) , 28-29 September, 2006

  2. Agenda: Learning and Analytical Perspectives Technology Futures Analysis Epistemological Onthological Praxilogical Axiological Cfr. Bedard, 1998

  3. Cognitive preparation to conti- • nually plan a changing society Figure 1 Relationship Between Change and Learning Source: Boisot, 1996.

  4. Cognitition and Learning • The cognitive processes involved in the strategic decision are similar to those involved in chess. • According to famous world champion Gary Kasparov (2005), after only three openning moves, there are more than nine-million possible positions. With this information, it is necessary to imagine all the possibilities or possible futures faced by an organization in real life, which respond to hundreds of variables, dozens of social players and multiple tendency combinations, change factors, events, and players. • Life like chess is an open ended game, • where the dinamicity of the environment forces the rethinking of strategy move after move. Embarking upon this constant feedback demands tools and attitudes, methodologies and manners of work to manage this double quality of facing a game of multiple options and continuous transformations. • Learning to create sense implies the capacity to think in terms of alternative futures • through the method of scenarios, but also the capacity of conducting a constant follow up of the environment through technological watch and competitive intelligence • A turbulent environment demands greater capacity for dynamic analysis of social change • and to modify, in real time, underlying suppositions that guide the institutional direction. This exercise represents an important collective effort to practice planning as a permanent learning process.

  5. 2. Epistemological: Map of Relationships between complexity and indetermination Source: Author´s elaboration

  6. Fundamental Principles Source: Medina and Ortegón (2006).

  7. 3. Praxilogical: On the TFA tool box • The construction of an integral tool box based on the concept of levels of complexity and indetermination introduces the following advantages: • It facilitates understanding the technical dimension of problems and the construction of more adequate methodological solutions. • It offers a common structure of concepts and theoretical frameworks on the validity of the predictions, forecasts, and diffuse wagers made on the future, from which multiple methodological design strategies can be elaborated. • It facilitates the explanation of the ways in which current tools of foresight and systematic analysis should be used and combined. • It discusses some voids in which new tools should be developed to solve problems in the greater levels of uncertainty. • It offers a conceptual structure that facilitates gathering and systemizing cases in the formulation of strategies by level of complexity and indetermination. • It stimulates the development of new skills to face growing levels of indetermination and ambiguity.

  8. 4. The axiological dimension :Management of foresight knowledge Source: Medina and Ortegón (2006)

  9. Co- Evolution Planning Tools Organizational Culture Monitoring of the Environment Disposition to Change Strategy Scenarios Technological Watch Planning as a learning process Source: Medina and Ortegón (2006).

  10. 5. The ontological dimension Continuous cycle of foresight aimed at social construction Source: Medina, 2000.

  11. Complementation between anticipation and construction of futures T Source: Medina and Ortegón (2006).

  12. Conclusions • On the limits of prediction • Abandoning the illusion of neo-classic foresight on the prediction of future events with total certainty is important to make better decisions in ever-changing environments. • Work criteria • Choosing the tools and the way of combining them varies depending on at least four fundamental elements: • The level of complexity and indetermination. • The scientific paradigm that validates the statements made about the future. • Characteristics of the structure of the problem under study; and • The cultural context where the exercise is conducted.

  13. Conclusions • Foresight as construction of futures • In this manner, foresight, understood as the construction of futures, broadens its functions and utility with relation to foresight understood merely as anticipation. Basically, the the educational and organizational function is added, stemming from the sociocultural dimension. • TFAs are not a mere tool box! • They are an instrument for the social construction of futures, under the ethical principles of responsibility, agreement, and caution (Porter, 2005). They are the tip of the iceberg of a way of thinking and living oriented toward the construction of a better future.

  14. References • Afuah, Allan (1999) La dinámica de la innovación organizacional, Oxford University Press, México. • Almquist, Eric & Hoban,Charles (2000) Señales de alerta, Gestión, Vol 5. No. 4, jul–ago. • Amara, Roy (1981a) “The futures field: searching for definitions and boundaries”, The Futurist, February. • Bedard, Rénee (1998) En: Competitividad y desarrollo social: retos perspectivas, Universidad del Valle, Cali. • Boisot, Max (1996) Aprender de la destrucción creativa: el desafío de la Europa Oriental, en: Manejo de lo desconocido. Creando nuevos futuros, Richard Boot; Jean Lawrance, John Morris, Mc Graw Hill, Bogotá. • Bunge, Mario (2004) La investigación científica, Siglo XXI Editores, Barcelona. • Bruner, Jerome (1988) Realidad mental y mundos posibles, Gedisa Editorial, Barcelona. • Cole, Sam (1998) “I modelli globali oltre l’eredità de’ I limiti”, En: Futuribili, 3, settembre, pág. 41–74. • Costa Filho, Alfredo (1997) Inflexiones recientes en el análisis prospectivo. En: “Prospectiva: construcción social de futuro”. Medina Vásquez, Javier & Ortegón, Edgar –Editores, Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES) - Universidad del Valle, Cali. • ______ (1988) Planificación y construcción de futuro, Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), Santiago de Chile. • Courtney, Hugh. Kirkland, Jane y Vigüerie, Patrick (2000) Estrategia en tiempos de incertidumbre. En: Harvard Buisinness Review, Deusto, Bilbao. • Courtney, Hugh (2002) Pre-Visión 20/20: Estrategias para el manejo de la incertidumbre en la administración de negocios, Editorial Norma, Bogotá. • De Geus, Arie (1988) Planning as learning, Harvard Business Review, march-april. • De Geus, Arie (1997) The living company, traducción italiana L’azienda del futuro, Franco Angeli, Milano.

  15. References • Di Michelis, Giorgio (1997) La complessita, in Manuale di Organizzazione Aziendale, A cura di Giovanni Costa e Raoul Nacamulli, Etas Libri, Torino. • Dror, Yehezkel (1993) Handbook of sistem analisis: craft issues and procedual choices. Editores: Hugh J. Misner and Edward S. Quade. Nueva York; pp. 247-281. • Dror, Yehezkel (1990) Enfrentando el futuro, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México. • European Regional Foresight College (2004) Glosario de Términos, Documento borrador en discusión colectiva. • Fernandez Diaz, Andrés (2000) Dinámica caótica en economía, McGraw Hill, Madrid. • Ferrando, Pier Maria (1977) L´incertezza e l´ambiguita, in Manuale di Organizzazione Aziendale, A cura di Giovanni Costa e Raoul Nacamulli, Etas Libri, Torino. • Ferraro, Pietro (1973) La costruzione del futuro come impegno morale, Ed. Armando, Roma. • Flechtheim, Ossip (1966) History and Futurology, Msisencheim am Glan, Verlag Anton Hain. • Gabilliet, Philippe (1999) Savoir anticiper, ESF Editeur, Paris. • Godet, Michel (1997) Manuel de prospective stratégique. vol. 1 une indiscipline intellectuelle. vol. 2 l'art et la méthode", Dunod, París. • Godet, Michel (1994) De la Anticipación a la Acción. Manual de Prospectiva Estrategica, Editorial Marcombo, Barcelona. • Gomes de Castro, A.M., Lima, S.M.V., Maestrey, A., Trujillo, V. Alfaro, O., Mengo, O., Medina, M. (2001) La dimensión de futuro en la construcción de la sostenibilidad institucional, Serie Innovación para la Sostenibilidad Institucional, Proyecto ISNAR “Nuevo Paradigma”, San José. • Goux–Baudiment, Fabienne (2000) Donner du futur aux territoires. Guide de prospective territoriale a l’usage des acteurs locaux. Collections du CERTU, Paris. • ______ (2001) Medida y máximo aprovechamiento del impacto de la prospectiva regional, The IPTS Report, Noviembre. • Kasparov, Gary (2005) Intensidad estratégica, Harvard Business Review, abril.

  16. References • Masini, Eleonora, (2000) Penser le futur, Dunod, Paris. • ______ (1989) “Possiamo costruire il futuro?”, Intervista a cura di Saveria Sechi. • ______ (1993) La previsión humana y social, Ciudad de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. • ______ (1989) “Possiamo costruire il futuro?”, Intervista a cura di Saveria Sechi. • ______ (1977), “A construção do futuro, tarefa do presente”, L’Osservatore Romano, Rome, 30 October. • Matus, Carlos (1993) Política planificación y gobierno, Instituto Latino Americano de Planificación Económica y Social, ILPES - Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Caracas. • Medina Vasquez, Javier (2003) Visión compartida de futuro, Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle, Cali. • ______ (2000) “Función de pensamiento de largo plazo: acción y redimensionamiento institucional del ILPES”, Cuadernos del ILPES, N. 46. • Medina Vásquez, Javier & Ortegón, Edgar (2006) Manual de Prospectiva y Decisión Estratégica: bases teóricas e instrumentos para América Latina y el Caribe, Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social – Comisión Económica para América Latina, Serie Manuales, No. 51, Santiago. • Medina Vásquez, Javier & Ortegón, Edgar (1997) Prospectiva: Construcción social del futuro, Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES) Universidad del Valle, Cali, 1997; 372 pp. • Miles, Ian (2005), “Prospectiva en Contexto, Curso Avanzado en Prospectiva Tecnológica”, Programa Colombiano de Prospectiva Tecnológica e Industrial–Instituto PREST, Bogotá, Universidad de Manchester. • Mintzberg, H.; Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1999) Safari en pays stratégie, Village Mondial, Paris. • Mojica, Francisco (2005) La construcción del futuro, Convenio Andrés Bello–Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá.

  17. References • Moura Paulo (1994) Construindo o futuro. O impacto global do novo paradigma, MAUAD Editorial. Rio de Janeiro. • Montañolas, Juan José (1987) “Prospectiva económica y social”, en: La construcción del futuro en América Latina, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Caracas. • Morrison, David; Quella, James; Moser, Ted; Slywotzky & Mundt, Kevin (2000) Profit patterns, Gestion–Book Summary, No. 3. • Moura Paulo (1994) Construindo o futuro. O impacto global do novo paradigma, MAUAD Editorial, Rio de Janeiro. • Ortegón, Edgar; Pacheco, Juan Francisco & Prieto, Adriana (2005) Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación, el seguimiento y la evaluación de proyectos y programas, ILPES/CEPAL Serie Manuales 42”. Santiago, 2005; LC/L.2288–P). • Popper, Karl (1994) En busca de un mundo mejor, Paidos, Barcelona. • Porter, Alan et al. (2004) Technology futures analysis: toward integration of the field and new methods, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, V. 71, No. 3; p. 287–303. • Prigogyne (1997) El fin de las certidumbres, Taurus, Madrid. • Santos De Miranda, Marcio; Coelho Massari, Gilda; Dos Santos, Dalci Maria; Fellows Filho, Lélio (2004) Prospeccao de tecnologias de futuro: métodos, técnicas e abordagens, Parcerias Estratégicas 19; dezembro. • Schwartz, Peter & Van der Heijden, Kees (1996) Culture d’entreprise et planification par scénarios: une relation de coévolution. Dans: La prospective stratégique d’entreprise. Jacques Lesourne & Christian Stoffaes (Eds). Intereditions, Paris. • Self-Rule Network (2005) Glosario de Términos, Documento en preparación.

  18. References • Senge, Peter (1990) La quinta disciplina, Juan Granica Editores, Barcelona. • Stafford & Sarrasin (2000) La prévision–prospective en gestion, Presses de l´Université du Québec, Québec. • Vélez, Ignacio (2003) Decisiones empresariales bajo riesgo e incertidumbre, Grupo Editorial Norma, Bogotá. • Wack, Pierre (1985) Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review, 63, N° 5; 73-89. • Wack, Pierre (1985) Scenarios: Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review, 63, N° 6; 139-150.

More Related