1 / 12

BPM Status

BPM Status. Pengjia Zhu 2013.9.11. 3.13. 3.14. 3.6. 3.9. 3.17. 3.27. 3.29. 2.5T 90 deg. 5T 6 deg. straight through. 2.5T 90 deg. septum fired. 2.5T 90 deg. 2.257GeV. 3.17 run 3273 raster size calibration. using 3.14 constant. BPM A. BPM B. BPM A constant works good.

saskia
Download Presentation

BPM Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BPM Status Pengjia Zhu 2013.9.11

  2. 3.13 3.14 3.6 3.9 3.17 3.27 3.29 2.5T 90 deg 5T 6 deg straight through 2.5T 90 deg septum fired 2.5T 90 deg 2.257GeV 3.17 run 3273 raster size calibration using 3.14 constant BPM A BPM B BPM A constant works good BPM B constant destroyed

  3. Reason: div changed from 4 to 2 for both BPM A and BPMB after 3176 run -> gain changed (auto gain, gain diff between + and - did not change) (I was thought the div will not change the position) BPM A seems was not affected BPM B tragedy

  4. 3.13 3.14 3.6 3.9 3.17 3.27 3.29 2.5T 90 deg 5T 6 deg straight through 2.5T 90 deg septum fired 2.5T 90 deg timeline auto gain 3.14 straight through harp scan 3.16 2.5T harp scan 3.16 harp scan have 3 runs with div=2 for BPM B (with target field) can use BPM A and harp05 to calibrate BPM B harp 05 Luckily... BPMA BPMB

  5. survey uncertainty -> 0.25 mm BPMA resolution limit ~ 0.15mm BPMA,BPMB,Harp are close (941,814,677mm) three harp scans' pos too close ~ 1-3mm pos got from BPMA and harp05 BPM B data The calibration failed Unfortrantly...

  6. New method to calibrate BPM -- brute force calibration

  7. first step BPMA Reliable BPM A position beam position at target got from carbon hole ~ 0.4mm uncertainty at target center position at BPM B

  8. visually see the changes ideal shape radius and center position from BPMA and carbon hole check if rotation changed only raster x turn on only raster y turn on calibrated BPM B shape sliders,manualy change constant packaged used: pyQT, matplotlib

  9. raw shape -- with 3/14 calibration constant ideal shape check if rotation changed only raster x turn on only raster y turn on BPM B shape

  10. optimized

  11. 3185 x position at target by using new constant matched with Chao's fit result

  12. Another job for beampackage: Optimized bpm calibration code, much faster Futher optimize: Use circle fit to get carbon hole center position instead of eyes Parameter to judge if circlular?

More Related