1 / 19

Analyzing Oligopolies and Game Theory

This article explores strategic options and payoffs in oligopolies using game theory. It discusses dominant strategies, multiple equilibria, prisoner's dilemma, and the kinked-demand curve. The article also examines non-cooperative cartels and non-cooperative oligopolies, highlighting the competitive behavior and possible outcomes.

saundersr
Download Presentation

Analyzing Oligopolies and Game Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Econ 201Lecture 8.1c1 Oligopolies & Game Theory 5-26-09

  2. Figure 12.4 Duopoly Equilibrium in a Centralized Cartel

  3. Duopoly • What are the strategic options and the payoffs? • Form a cartel • Forego additional profits from increasing output beyond assigned quota • Bilateral monopoly • Each firm sets Qs at MR(market) = MC(firm) • Price falls below single monopoly/cartel price • Compete on price • Final equilibrium at competitive market price • No monopoly rents (or + economic profits)

  4. Game Theory • Game theory is a methodology that can be used to analyze both cooperative and non-cooperative oligopolies. • Recognizes the interdependence of the firms’ actions • Using a payoff matrix to describe options (strategies) and payoffs • Firms are profit maximizers!

  5. Figure 12.7 Xbox and PlayStation 2 Payoff Matrix for Advertising

  6. Determining the Dominate Strategy • A dominant strategy occurs when one strategy is best for a player regardless of the rival’s actions. • Dominate strategy equilibrium—neither player has reason to change their actions because they are pursuing the strategy that is optimal under all circumstances. • Here the dominant strategy is for each firm to advertise

  7. Multiple Equilibria • Sometimes there are come cases where there are multiple Nash equilibria. • In this case, the outcome is uncertain. • Firms will have an incentive to collude. • An example: • Sony/Microsoft can add one of two new features • One feature appeals only to YOUTH market • Other feature appeals only to TEEN market • Incentive to reach agreement on both firms offering the same new (one only) feature

  8. Payoff TableFigure 12.8 Nash Equilibria

  9. Prisoner's Dilemma • A prisoner’s dilemma occurs when the dominate strategy leads all players to an undesired outcome.

  10. Figure 12.9 Prisoners’ Dilemma

  11. Best Outcome • Neither confesses • But without collusion/agreement – how do you guarantee this outcome? • Enforcement issues (price, output, quotas) • Law & Order • Why we keep suspects separated! • Prevent collusive agreements

  12. An Economic Application of Game Theory: the Kinked-Demand Curve • Above the kink, demand is relatively elastic because all other firm’s prices remain unchanged. Below the kink, demand is relatively inelastic because all other firms will introduce a similar price cut, eventually leading to a price war. Therefore, the best option for the oligopolist is to produce at point E which is the equilibrium point

  13. Nash Equilibrium • If firm facing kinked demand curve tries to raise price: • Other firms do not • As demand is highly elastic and other firms are “close” substitutes • Loses market share and revenues • If firm lowers price • Competitors match price decreases

  14. Nash Equilibrium • If firm facing kinked demand curve tries to raise price: • Other firms do not • As demand is highly elastic and other firms are “close” substitutes • Loses market share and revenues • If firm lowers price • Competitors match price decreases

  15. Features of a Nash Equilibrium • In a non-cooperative oligopoly, each firm has little incentive to change price. • This represents a Nash Equilibrium, where each firm’s pricing strategy remains constant given the pricing strategy of the other firms. • Firms have no incentive to change their strategy.

  16. Non-Cooperative Cartels Either • Some degree of price competition • Firms engage in highly competitive pricing • Similar outcome as perfect competition • Firms have some market power • Resembles monopolistic competition • Bilateral monopoly with price competition • or Stable prices prevail • Non-collusive • Firms choose not to compete because of kinked demand curve

  17. Non-cooperative Oligopolies • Competitive/psuedo-competitive behavior (non-cooperative) • Perfect Competition (almost): firms undercut each other’s prices • competition between sellers is fierce, with relatively low prices and high production • Outcome may be similar to PC or Monopolistic Competition • Nash equilibrium • Firms avoid “ruinous” price competition by keeping prices stable and avoiding price competition (undercutting each others prices) • May lead to product proliferation and/or extensive advertising (non-price competition)

  18. Figure 12.3 U.S. 2003 Advertising-to-Sales Ratio for Selected Products and Industries

  19. Game Theory Modelsof Oligoploy • Stackelberg's duopoly. In this model the firms move sequentially (see Stackelberg competition). • Cournot's duopoly. In this model the firms simultaneously choose quantities (see Cournot competition). • Bertrand's oligopoly. In this model the firms simultaneously choose prices (see Bertrand competition). • Monopolistic competition. A market structure in which several or many sellers each produce similar, but slightly differentiated products. Each producer can set its price and quantity without affecting the marketplace as a whole.

More Related