700 likes | 827 Views
Why eCME ?. eCME 2011. Integrating eCME With Other Education. eCME Beyond 2011 + Role of Social Networks. Physician engagement with successful eCME platforms. Improving Healthcare Worldwide. Why eCME ?. Three Years and Still Going!. eCME 2009 Defining eCME Who cares? eCME 2010
E N D
Why eCME? eCME 2011 Integrating eCME With Other Education eCME Beyond 2011 + Role of Social Networks Physician engagement with successful eCME platforms Improving Healthcare Worldwide.
Three Years and Still Going! • eCME 2009 • Defining eCME • Who cares? • eCME 2010 • People are interested • Are learners learning? • eCME 2011 • Global acceptance • Is it quality education and are funders funding?
Impact of eCME in Europe – 2010 ECF http://www.pmlive.com/find_an_article/allarticles/categories/pr_and_med_ed/2010/november/features/navigating_the_minefield
Where Does eCME Fit in European Mix – 2010? http://www.pmlive.com/find_an_article/allarticles/categories/pr_and_med_ed/2010/november/features/navigating_the_minefield
Globally There is Interest But Little Strategy • Digital delivery of “real” CME/CPD is sporadic • Accreditation needs and rules vary • Non-CME content is used and appreciated • Non-CME medical e- and m- platforms are used and appreciated • Why the disconnect?
Requirements • Mandatory Legal Austria Czech Republic France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia Croatia Switzerland • Mandatory – Professional Germany Italy Netherlands UK Switzerland • Voluntary Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Denmark Finland Greece Iceland Luxembourg Malta Norway Portugal Spain SwedenTurkey • Re-certification Hungary Netherlands Norway Slovenia Croatia • Re-licensing Hungary Ireland Netherlands Croatia
On average, CME cycles last 4 yearsduringwhichMedicalSpecialists have to collecteachyeararound 46 credits or 13 days of CME activities. CME Activities Cycle
Sanctions • None Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Greece Iceland Italy Luxembourg Malta, Netherlands Poland Spain Sweden • Professional Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands (the), Romania, Slovenia, UK, USA • Loss of License Germany Greece Netherlands (the) Slovakia, Switzerland • Financial Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Malta, Norway ,Slovakia, Switzerland, USA • Certificate Awarded Austria Cyprus Germany Poland
ResponsibleAuthority • Government Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy Netherlands (the); Norway, Poland Slovakia Spain Sweden, Switzerland, USA • National Professional Body Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland Netherlands, Poland Slovakia Spain Sweden, Switzerland • National Medical Association Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Italy, Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Romania Slovakia Slovenia Sweden Switzerland Turkey • National Scientific Society Cyprus Denmark Greece Netherlands Slovakia Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, USA • Universities Greece Hungary Italy Poland Slovakia • Insurance Organizations
ResponsibleAuthority • Government Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy Netherlands (the); Norway, Poland Slovakia Spain Sweden, Switzerland, USA • National Professional Body Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland Netherlands, Poland Slovakia Spain Sweden, Switzerland • National Medical Association Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Italy, Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Romania Slovakia Slovenia Sweden Switzerland Turkey • National Scientific Society Cyprus Denmark Greece Netherlands Slovakia Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, USA • Universities Greece Hungary Italy Poland Slovakia • Insurance Organisations
Recognised CPD Activities • Communication skills Austria Belgium Croatia Denmark Finland Germany Ireland Netherlands Norway Poland Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey UK, USA • Economical skills Austria Belgium Denmark Finland Germany Ireland Norway Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey UK, USA • Legal skills Austria Belgium Croatia, Denmark Finland Ireland Norway Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey UK, USA
CME Plus E Plus M • eCME and mCME typically refer to delivery of content • The beauty of online and mobile platforms is that they are expected to be interactive • This presents opportunities for • Data gathering (needs assessments, peri- and post-activity queestioning) • Branched learning
Branched Learning? • Learners participate in education that has interactive questions • Didactic or case based • Responses guide learners down different paths • Incorrect responses trigger educational teachable moments • Managing cases leads to • Good patient outcomes • Dead patients • Things in between the extremes • Leads to education
Greater Use is NOT Limited by the Platforms! • CME/CPD rules, requirements, definitions, needs, acceptance, capabilities vary greatly • Terms like satellite symposium have different meanings globally • CME is CME when it needs to be CME otherwise it isn’t CME
The Platform Presents the Opportunity • Most CME in all forms focuses on diseases and/or treatments • Most CME in all forms lacks focus on management of patients (including prevention) • eCME and mCME can, should, does and will embrace the patient management model • And this will happen at the Point of Care
The Power Of The Platform • CME can be deployed in any form (video, slideshow, podcast, etc) • The community drives learning and awareness • Peer-to-Peer interaction influences learning and behavior change – • Reinforcement of learning through community acceptance • Immediate feedback - quality of CME product, etc
The Power Of The Platform • Behavior change tracking • Track over time • Capture how each physician behaves, reports, and discusses the topic as time goes on • Do they evangelize the technique/process/treatment/etc • Do they ask about it again? • vs. traditional post CME surveys (one and done)
Expectations of the Platforms • Simple • Easy • Graphics • Easily navigable • Recommendations • eCME and mCME can be like amazon.com
In The US in 2011 • We are seeing a fundamental shift in content formats and types • eCME, mCME and other formats are taking a curricular approach • The one and done tactic has met its death • Shorter duration higher impact • eCME and mCME are using innovative instructional design to impact learning • Educational impact is being measured • You can’t treasure it if you can’t measure it1 1Andree Bates, PhD, Eularis, at Eyetorpharma ePharma Marketing 2009, Munich.
2,031 HCPs participated in live CME • 487 patients participated in text messaging, receiving an aggregated total of 44,841 text messages on FM Smartphones and CME • Used for self-assessment measurements of knowledge and competency • Used to deliver MicroCME, small “bursts” of education and reminders • Used to deliver text messages to clinicians and patients alike Smartphone Apps
Smartphones and CME • Used for self-assessment measurements of knowledge and competency • Used to deliver MicroCME, small “bursts” of education and reminders • Used to deliver text messages to clinicians and patients alike Smartphone Apps
NOF Guidelines App, a joint development project Smartphones and CME • Used for self-assessment measurements of knowledge and competency • Used to delivery MicroCME, small “bursts” of education and reminders • Used for delivering text messages to clinicians and patients alike Smartphone Apps
MD Self-Assessment App, measuring knowledge and awareness of chronic pain management Smartphones and CME • Used for self-assessment measurements of knowledge and competency • Used to delivery MicroCME, small “bursts” of education and reminders • Used for delivering text messages to clinicians and patients alike Smartphone Apps
Where can you envision integrating eCME or mCME with other education?
eCME mCME PLUS • No live education should occur without allowing the content to live on • In the appropriate revised format • A curricular approach supports education • Prequels, sequels, and equals
Multiple Formats Serve All Learning Styles Online | Smartphone | Print | Live & Workshops | MicroCME | Video
CME Could And Should Provide A Mechanism For Using The Latest Information Presented
In Europe • Need for more defined eCME/CPD where needed • Sometimes the need needs to be established • Need to advocate for broader acceptance of varied formats by accreditation bodies • EACCME • Need for shift in content to reflect measured patient care needs of learners
Question: Will technology-based CME/CPD replace some or all of live CME/CPD?
Online CME – Present and Future • Currently 6-8% (as of 2008) • 76% is housed on 16% of sites surveyed • 70% is $10 or less • 60% developed by publishing or private medical education providers • Will make up >50% of all CME in next 8-10 years Harris JM, et al. JCEHP Winter 2010, 30(1) 3-10
Is There A Place For Social Networking in Medicine and CME? • Physicians and healthcare providers need to communicate • With each other • With their patients • With the public • With other professionals • Physicians and healthcare providers represent a “community” • Needs assessments and professional practice gap analyses consistently identify communications as an area of need • Most importantly: know your audience! • Not all physicians will want to use social networking • Of course not all wanted the Internet of email either • Know barriers, obstacles, and value definitions • It may or may not be generational • Think Prochaska readiness to change1 1http://www.uri.edu/research/cprc/TTM/detailedoverview.htm
Big Questions For Many • Who is going to use it? • Who is going to pay for it? • Is it sustainable? • Who can do it? • Who should do it? • Who will do it? • Who will monitor it?