100 likes | 246 Views
Large potential future methane emissions from Arctic permafrost Ivar S.A. Isaksen CICERO. CH 4 +OH → CH 3 + H 2 O. Global increase in NOx, CO and methane tend to increase tropospheric ozone Increases in tropospheric ozone will increase OH through the reaction :
E N D
Large potentialfuturemethaneemissions from Arctic permafrostIvar S.A. IsaksenCICERO
CH4+OH → CH3+ H2 O Global increase in NOx, CO and methanetend to increasetroposphericozone Increases in troposphericozonewillincrease OH throughthereaction: HO2+O3→ OH + 2O2
Methaneemission Indirecteffect: • Increasesitsownlifetimethroughthereactionwiththehydroxylradical (OH) • Current feedback factor: Approx. 0.4 Importantchemicalreactions: • Producesozone in the UTLS region • Produces water vapour in thestratosphere • Produces CO2 in theatmosphere Global methaneemission: • Total current GWP due to methanerelease: Approx. 25 • Increaseswithlargemethaneemissionincreases in the Arctic
Oslo CTM3 – testing large CH4 emissions • Hydrate emissions from Siberian shelf 1000Tg(CH4)/year • Emitted during Jun-Nov • Emission period: 10 years • Simulating additional 15 years of normal emissions
Changes in atmosphericmethaneburden for 10 yearsof 1000 Tg/yearemission in 10 years The burdenincreases from 4800 Tg to 12.0 Tg It is reduced to 7.2 Tg after 15 yearsofnoextraemission
Change in averageatmosphericmethanelifetime for a 1000 Tg /year methaneemission from the Arctic over 100 years Averagebackgroundatmosphericmethanelifetime: 8.6 years After 10 yearsof 1000 Tg/yearemission from the Arctic: 11.6 years
Predictedlargeozone and methaneenhancement from methaneemissions
Changes in methane and ozone 15 years after the emission period Methane and ozonerecovery is fast, takesonly a fewdecades
Factsyouneed to knowaboutthe Arctic methanetimebomb Dismissalsofcatastrophicmethanedangerignore robust science in favourofoutdatedmythologyofclimatesafety Whythejury's still outonthe risk of Arctic methanecatastrophe. Can scientists overcome huge uncertainties to pin downhowclose, or far, wemight be to a tipping point? One sourceoftheseemissions "may be highlypotential and extremely mobile shallowmethanehydrates, whosestabilityzone is seabed permafrost-related and could be disturbedupon permafrost development, degradation, and thawing.” From SkepticalScience: "There is noevidencethatmethanewill run outofcontrol and initiateanysudden, catastrophiceffects."