310 likes | 424 Views
Unit 3 Constitutional Change. Essential Question. How Has the Constitution Been Changed to Further the Ideals Contained in the Declaration of Independence. Unit Overview. Lesson 15 : How Have Amendments and Judicial Review Changed the Constitution?
E N D
Unit 3 Constitutional Change
Essential Question • How Has the Constitution Been Changed to Further the Ideals Contained in the Declaration of Independence
Unit Overview • Lesson 15: How Have Amendments and Judicial Review Changed the Constitution? • Lesson 16: What Is the Role of Political Parties in the Constitutional System? • Lesson 17: How Did the Civil War Test and Transform the American Constitutional System? • Lesson 18: How Has the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment Changed the Constitution? • Lesson 19: How Has the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Changed the Constitution? • Lesson 20: How Has the Right to Vote Been Expanded since the Adoption of the Constitution?
Unit 2 Purpose • Since 1787, the Constitution has changed in several important ways. The Framers provided mechanisms for change, such as Amendments. • The Civil War transformed the Constitution in several ways towards ideals of equality contained in The Declaration of Independence. • In this unit, you will learn how judicial review and political parties affect American constitutionalism. Also, you will learn about the Civil War’s creation of a “2nd American Constitution” through the transformation of due process, equal protections, and expansion of voting rights.
Lesson 15: • How Have Amendments and Judicial Review Changed the Constitution?
Purpose • This lesson describes the process devised for amending the Constitution and its first application, the Bill of Rights. • It also explains judicial review, and the arguments for and against this judicial power.
Objectives • Describe the two ways in which the Constitution can be amended. • Identify major categories of constitutional amendments. • Explain why Madison introduced the Bill of Rights. • Evaluate, take, and defend positions on the amendment process and judicial review.
Terms to Know • Amendment • A change in or addition to a legal document. • Judicial Review • The power of the courts to declare laws and actions of the local and state governments or the national government invalid if they are found to contradict the U.S. Constitution.
How and Why the Framers Devised an Amendment Process • Founders recognized that society & conditions would change over time. • The Constitution is difficult to amend • 2/3 of Congress to Propose, ¾ of States to Amend • Over 10,000 have been introduced to Congress • Only 33 were officially proposed • Of 33, only 27 ratified
What Types of Amendments Have Been Adopted? • Bill of Rights (1791) • First 10 Amendments protect basic rights and liberties • Fundamental Changes • 13th & 14th resulted from Civil War and resolved issues not settled at Constitutional Convention • Outlawed slavery • defined citizenship • imposed equal protection and due process requirements on states • gave Congress more enforcement power
Expansion of Suffrage • 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th prohibit states from denying voting rights based on race, gender, age of persons of 18 or older, or failure to pay poll taxes • Overturning Supreme Court Decisions • 11th overturned improper expansion of federal court power • 16th overturned decision that prevented Congress from passing an income tax
Refinements • 12th requires electors to make separate choices for president and vice president • 20th shortened length of time between elections and when official take office. • 22nd limits president to 2 terms • 25th addresses presidential succession • Morality • 18th outlawed manufacture, sale, and transport of alcohol (Prohibition) • 21st repeals the 18th
Why a Bill of Rights was Proposed • Many states and prominent figures argued for specific protections and listed rights • Madison followed through on his promise to immediately add amendments (bill of rights) in first session of Congress
The Development of Judicial Review • Marbury v. Madison (1803) • Chief Justice John Marshall concludes that judges have the power to decide whether acts of Congress, the executive branch, state laws, and even State Constitutions violate the US Constitution • Supreme Court justices have the final say about the meaning of the Constitution • This power to declare what the Constitution means and whether government actions violate the Constitution is know as JUDICIAL REVIEW
Controversy Over Judicial Review • No mention of judicial review in Constitution • However, founders assumed this power would be developed (Practice has roots in English Law) • Marshall asserted that it is the “duty of the judicial department to say what law is.”
Premises of Judicial Review • The Constitution is a superior, paramount law that cannot be changed by ordinary means. • Acts of Congress, the Executive, and the States reflect temporary, fleeting views of what law is. • Acts of Congress, the Executive, and the States that conflict with the Constitution are not entitled to enforcement and must be disregarded. • Judges are in the best position to declare what the Constitution means.
Arguments Against Judicial Review • Popular Sovereignty is represented in the Legislatures. Judicial Review disregards sovereignty of the people. • Judicial Review could lead to political turmoil if other branches or states to not follow the courts’ interpretations. • Judicial Review makes judiciary equal or even superior to legislatures, even though judges are not elected • All government officials take oath to consider constitutionality of their actions • Judges errors in interpretation cannot be corrected through voting, but only through amendments
Lesson 16: • What Is the Role of Political Parties in the Constitutional System?
Purpose • Shortly after the government was established, to the Framers’ dismay, political parties formed. • This lesson describes the Framers’ views on political parties and how they first formed. • It also explains how parties became and essential component of the American political system by addressing challenges that the Constitution left unresolved.
Objectives • Explain why the Framers opposed the idea of political parties. • Describe the other ideas that helped political parties gain acceptance. • Explain the conflicting points of view that led to the development of parties and the roles they have played in history. • Evaluate, take, and defend positions on the importance of political parties today.
Terms to Know • delegated powers • According to the natural rights philosophy, people always retain their basic rights, but provisionally entrust or assign certain powers to their government for certain, limited purposes. The powers of government are therefore "delegated powers" in that they are granted by the people, and the people can take them back if government fails to fulfill its purposes. • party system • A concept in political science that political parties control government. • platform • List of the policies and priorities of a political party; also known as a manifesto. • political party • An organization seeking to achieve political power by electing members to public office so that its political philosophy is reflected in public policy. • sedition • Incitement to rebellion. • ticket • The choice of candidates of a political party for president and vice president.
The Framers’ Thoughts on Political Parties • Madison argues that Constitution would control “evil” effects of factions • Some (Burke) consider parties necessary to express open opposition to gov’t policies • Most American leaders oppose Burke, but many agree that they can “promote deliberation” and “check excesses in the majority” • Delegates had no true experience with an established party system.
The Development of Political Parties • Ironically, Madison and Hamilton become opposing leaders of political parties w/in 10 yrs of ratification • Issue that led to party division: • 1. Power of National Government • Hamilton – National Gov’t should address any national issue, mentioned in Constitution or not • Jefferson – Feared vague national powers and “energetic” use of authority
2. Economic Vision • Hamilton – National bank “necessary,” ex. Collect taxes, regulate trade • Jefferson – Believed in agrarian society, congress should only act if absolutely and indispensably necessary • 3. Foreign Policy • Jefferson – supported France in Napoleonic wars, helped us during Rev. W/ Madison helps create Republican party. • Hamilton – supported GB, more trade and cultural connection. Develops into Federalist party. • Neither side accepted other as a long-term, durable “loyal opposition”
4. Alien & Sedition Acts • Adams signs acts that gave him power to deport “dangerous” foreigners and criminalize “seditious” language • Republicans (Jeff., Mad.) outraged at censorship, respond with KY and VA Resolutions (state need not comply w/ acts of Congress) • Mobilized Republicans for election of 1800.
The Revolution of 1800 and its Aftermath • First election to feature candidates from political parties (Fed.–Adams, Repub.-Jeff) • Repub. victory symbolized first transfer of power through election rather than heredity / violence
However, exposed problem in Constitution • Jeff & Burr tie, electors could not specify which would be president. House had to decide. • 12th Amendment • Vote for Pres. & VP on same ballot • Jefferson opposed permanent political parties and thought Federalists ideals would fade away
Political Party Growth and Functions • By 1820s, positive vision of parties emerged • Van Buren touts parties with clear principles and offer a clear choice • Parties are “glue” that holds federal system / checks and balances together. • Helped president work w/ Congress • Bridged great distances between Washington & people
Patronage enabled president to build connections across levels of gov’t • Elaborate entertainments boost support and give members sense of belonging. • Unlike Jeff / Hamilton, Van Buren felt competing notions of common good could coexist. • Those out of power would hold them accountable / additional check and balance
Political Parties Today • Democrats and Republicans have dominated since 1860s • Purposes of political parties today • Mobilize participation • Connect Executive and Legislative branches • Connect national & state governments • Creation and promotion of party platforms • Provide forums to deliberate about public policies / help organize & channel passions & interests • Provides stability • Ensures change in gov’t, not Constitution
Less Favorable Aspects… • Mutes truly alternative views • Minor parties generally small, narrow interests. Little to no chance of competing nationally. • If single set of interest gains dominant power w/in a party, threat of majority tyranny.