1 / 7

GA.4.Disasters Discussion of “Expected Outcomes”

Explore outcomes for satellites in disaster management, including coordination, disaster portals, and improved data access.

scornish
Download Presentation

GA.4.Disasters Discussion of “Expected Outcomes”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GA.4.Disasters Discussion of “Expected Outcomes” Karen Moe/NASA Earth Science Technology Office Presented at CEOS-WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary September 27, 2011

  2. GA.4.Disasters Agenda • GA.4.Disasters – GEOSS Architecture for the Use of Satellites for Disaster Management and Risk Assessment • Project Purpose • Status • Disasters SBA Overview – Andrew Eddy • Enterprise Architecture Overview – John Evans • Discussion on WGISS ‘expected outcomes’ • Draft Enterprise Architecture Outline – John Evans • Next Steps WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

  3. Outcomes for WGISS Discussion and Concurrence • ? WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

  4. “Strawman” Outcomes for WGISS Discussion and Concurrence (1) • Ready access to GA.4.Disasters team findings, reports • Clearly delineated scope addressing roles (either in or out of scope) for components including • International Charter on Disasters • CEOS WGISS member data for disasters, for risk assessment • CEOS Supersites • Relevant portals (e.g., earthquake E-DECIDER) • SERVIR regional disaster data support capability • Relevant sensor web, GRID, web service infrastructure • Clarify need and recommendations for a Disasters Portal WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

  5. “Strawman” Outcomes for WGISS Discussion and Concurrence (2) • Closer coordination between WGISS and Disasters SBA on DI-06-09 pilots • Caribbean Satellite and Disaster Pilot • Southern Africa Flood and Health Pilot (Namibia) • WGISS-26 (Toulouse) suggestion: Demonstrate the possibility of fast access to, and more automated processing of newly collected imagery during disasters, to concretely support the response phase (web services) • WGISS-29 (Bonn) UN-SPIDER needs assessment • Improvements to disaster/risk assessment products development and delivery WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

  6. “Strawman” Outcomes for WGISS Discussion and Concurrence (3) • Clarify need and recommendations for a Disasters Portal • Information on the types of disasters, including gap assessments for each type • Observational requirements for each disaster type / phase • Access to disasters related informational products via disaster types (floods, etc) • Access to mission/instrument and in-situ data via search capability specific to disasters • Access to models WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

  7. GA.4.Disasters Agenda • GA.4.Disasters – GEOSS Architecture for the Use of Satellites for Disaster Management and Risk Assessment • Project Purpose • Status • Disasters SBA Overview – Andrew Eddy • Enterprise Architecture Overview – John Evans • Discussion on WGISS ‘expected outcomes’ • Draft Enterprise Architecture Outline – John Evans • Next Steps WGISS-32 Budapest, Hungary

More Related