290 likes | 362 Views
Explore the history of scientific politics, from Enlightenment ideals to modern protests and critiques. Learn about key figures like Montesquieu, Bentham, and Eijkman, and delve into the political implications of scientific advancements.
E N D
Science & Politics • a centrally important topic • a large and manifold topic many meanings: • science policy • academic politics • micropolitics of gender etc. • political implications of science • here: “scientific politics”
Science & Politics this lecture: • history of scientific politics • protests against scientific politics • critique & alternative view
1. scientific politics • roots in Enlightenment • the project of Enlightenment • science and social progress • reason in public affairs
1. scientific politics Montesquieu (1689-1755): • l’Esprit des Lois (1748) • climate & polity • scientific basis: • Boerhaave’s physiology • his own experiments
1. scientific politics Turgot (1727-1781): • physiocrat • vs. tradition&privilege • for economic reforms, rational government • based on a science of man and of society • minister to Louis XVI
1. scientific politics Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832): • utilitarianism • the greatest happiness for the greatest number
1. scientific politics • later 19th and 20th century incarnations: • Marxism • positivism • Technocracy movement (Thorstein Veblen) • Scientific Management (Taylorism) • 2 less known examples
1. scientific politics Pieter Eijkman (1862-1914) • physician • World Capital near The Hague • Peace Palace • scientific academies & research institutes • like social medicine
1. scientific politics Pieter Eijkman (1862-1914) • physician • World Capital near The Hague • Peace Palace • scientific academies & research institutes • like social medicine
1. scientific politics Pieter Eijkman (1862-1914) • physician • World Capital near The Hague • Peace Palace • scientific academies & research institutes • like social medicine
1. scientific politics • Jan Burgers: • background as communist • cultural pessimism • science and values • Study Center for Social Issues (1946) • influence postwar government • Central Planning Bureau
1. scientific politics • H.G. Wells: • SF author • influence • World State • science/ scientists experts
2. protests • Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (1817) • background • story • Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)
2. protests • Aldous Huxley, Brave New World (1932) • background • story (incubators, classes, soma, stability, happiness, science) • ambiguity? • anti-Wells
2. protests • Jurgen Habermas: • decisionistic society • experts no longer ‘on tap’ but ‘on top’ • depolitization • technocracy
3. critique • common elements advocates and critics: • science as one best way • presumed one way traffic: science politics • objections: • history scientisms: various political orientations • as much politics inside as outside science • two historical examples
3. critique Example 1: • Royal Society program of experimental science around 1650 vs • Thomas Hobbes
3. critique • competing understandings of natural philosophy (aim, place of experiment, certainty, publicness) • opinion/fact • context of Restoration England
3. critique • competing understandings of natural philosophy (aim, place of experiment, certainty, publicness) • opinion/fact • context of Restoration England
3. critique Example 2: • Lavoisier’s ‘new’ chemistry around 1780 vs • Phlogiston chemistry
1. critique • new table of elements • new nomenclature: e.g. “oxygène de fer” • theory • single experiments • quantification
3. critique • context of physiocracy & state policies • FR and Napoleon
3. critique Conclusion: • expert diversity • Politics in science/science in politics • impossibility of technocracy