1 / 15

Federal Criminal & Civil Remedies for Unconstitutional Conduct

Federal Criminal & Civil Remedies for Unconstitutional Conduct. Title 42 USC Section 1982 Under Color of State Law. Immunity. Absolute Immunity Judges Legislators Prosecutors Statements made within the context of a judicial hearing. Immunity. Qualified Immunity

seanna
Download Presentation

Federal Criminal & Civil Remedies for Unconstitutional Conduct

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Criminal & Civil Remedies for Unconstitutional Conduct • Title 42 USC Section 1982 • Under Color of State Law

  2. Immunity • Absolute Immunity • Judges • Legislators • Prosecutors • Statements made within the context of a judicial hearing

  3. Immunity • Qualified Immunity • Violation was not clearly established at time of the act • A reasonable public official confronted with these facts could have believed that his of her conduct conformed to the relevant standard.

  4. Immunity • State Tort Immunity • Willful and Wanton Misconduct • Conscious Disregard for the Safety of Others

  5. Graham v. Connor (1989) page 718 • Questions to be answered • What is the improper police conduct? • What other case that we have discussed is used as the foundation for this case? • What is the proper Amendment to consider when addressing the improper police misconduct in this case? • What is the standard to be applied in this case? As opposed to what other standard? • Issue? Be careful, the true issue is not in the regular spot. • Holding?

  6. Factors in Determining Reasonablenessin Police Use of Force Cases • Severity of crime • Suspect poses an immediate threat • Resisting arrest or attempting to flee

  7. Mental State for Excessive Use of Force for Different B of Rs Applications • Police Officers Use of Force is examined by the courts using a reasonableness standard necessitated because this is a seizure and therefore the 4th Amendment Controls. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons … against unreasonable … seizures, shall not be violated…”

  8. Mental State for Excessive Use of Force for Different B of Rs Applications • Correctional Officers’ Use of Force is examined by the courts using a willful and wanton standard necessitated because excessive force after conviction is punishment and therefore the 8th Amendment Controls. “(C)ruel and unusual punishment (shall not be) inflicted.” • Cruel and unusual indicates intentional behavior.

  9. Police Officer in Liable Under Sec. 1983 • If their comrades commit brutality and they take no action to stop it.

  10. Liability of Private Individuals Based on Section 1983 • Act in concert with police. • Act under State compulsion or with significant State encouragement • Perform a public function (private corporation operating State prison.)

  11. Criminal Responsibility Title 18 USC 242 • Act under color of law (not just State Law) • Possessed a willful intent (mental state) • Violated a constitutional right (that has been) • Previously made specific through judicial decision. LESS THAN 2% OF CASES ARE PROSECUTED

  12. 14th Amendment • … nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law: nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

  13. Protection Afforded by the 14th Amendment • Substantive Due Process • Culpable Action DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services = No constitutional duty of the public official to protect the public from harm except: • Discriminatory Denial of Police Protection • Jeffrey Dahmer • Duty to Protect Persons in Custody – People are no longer capable of taking care of themselves • Kneipp v. City of Philadelphia

  14. Equal Protection of the Law • Deliberately treating one person differently from another because; • A person’s membership in a protected class • A desire to punish the person for exercising a constitutional right • Malicious intent to injure the person out of spite.

  15. Law Enforcement Professional’s Constitutional Rights in the Workplace • 1st Amendment Rights • Limited rights after Garcetti v. Ceballos • 4th Amendment Rights • Limited in employment case • 5th Amendment Rights • Garrity

More Related