'Categorical propositions' presentation slideshows

Chapter 5

Chapter 5. Categorical Propositions. 1. A deductive argument is one that claims to establish its conclusion conclusively. A valid deductive argument is one in which, if all the premises are true, the conclusion must be true .

919 views • 72 slides

Dr. Robert Barnard

638 views • 46 slides

4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions

4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions. Categorical Propositions: Relate subject terms and predicate terms. Either all or part of the class denoted by the subject term is included or excluded from the class denoted by the predicate term. 4.1 Continued. Standard Form:

714 views • 34 slides

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM. Michael Jhon M. Tamayao, M.A. Phil. LOGIC College of Medical Technology Cagayan State University. INTRODUCTION Review of categorical propositions RULES FOR MAKING VALID CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS The 10 rules. THE STANDARD FORMS OF A VALID CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

660 views • 31 slides

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM. ARBIND KUMAR SINGH Logical Reasoning Alternative Learning System NEW DELHI. INTRODUCTION Review of categorical propositions RULES FOR MAKING VALID CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS The 10 rules. THE STANDARD FORMS OF A VALID CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM Figures Moods

453 views • 31 slides

Logic

Logic. HUM 200 Categorical Syllogisms. Lectures taken from Copi, I., & Cohen, C. (2009). HUM200: Introduction to logic: 2009 custom edition (13 th ed.) . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Objectives. When you complete this lesson, you will be able to:

643 views • 29 slides

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS DEFINITION: A DECLARATIVE SENTENCE IN WHICH SUBJECT TERM AND PREDICATE TERM ARE RELATED AS CATEGORIES.

457 views • 28 slides

Categorical propositions and classes

Categorical propositions and classes. Basic connectives and truth. Assertions, called statements or propositions, are declarative sentences that are either true or false New statements can be obtained from existing ones in two ways. Transform a given statement p into the statement ? p

272 views • 25 slides

Categorical Propositions

Categorical Propositions. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 20, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University. Four Types of Categorical Propositions. Boolean Square of Opposition. What does it mean for a term to be distributed ?.

367 views • 21 slides

Chapter 19: Living in the Real World

Chapter 19: Living in the Real World. Introductory Remarks (p. 190).

225 views • 13 slides

4 Categorical Propositions

4 Categorical Propositions. 4.1 THE COMPONENTS OF CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS. Standard Form Categorical Propositions. All S are P No S are P Some S are P Some S are not P Unless a statement is in one of these four forms, it is not in standard form. Standard Form Categorical Proposition.

731 views • 9 slides

Chapter 6.6: Enthymemes

738 views • 6 slides

Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions

Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141). Review of deductive arguments Form Valid/Invalid Soundness Categorical syllogisms concern relations among classes. They were first discussed by Aristotle (384-322 BCE). Categorical Propositions (pp. 142-144).

242 views • 5 slides

COM 362 FULL COURSE DISCUSSIONS GCU

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/com-362-full-course-discussions-gcu/ COM 362 TOPIC 1 DQ 1 Aristotle described argumentation as the following: u201cFor to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves, and to attack others.u201d Aristotleu2019s description of argumentation represents his view of how argumentation is a part of who we are as human beings. Do you agree or disagree with Aristotleu2019s viewpoint? Explain why. How has his viewpoint played a significant role in the historical development of argumentation? COM 362 TOPIC 1 DQ 2 Find a blog that presents and defends an argument within one of its posts. Write a paragraph evaluating the arguments as either inductive or deductive. Provide the blog link in your paragraph response. Why do you think identifying these different elements in an argument is important? COM 362 TOPIC 2 DQ 1 When watching or reading the news, what fallacies do you see people make most often in their arguments? COM 362 TOPIC 2 DQ 2

36 views • 3 slides

COM 362 TOPIC 4 DISCUSSIONS GCU

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/com-362-topic-4-discussions-gcu/ COM 362 TOPIC 4 DQ 1 Examine an argument made in public and translate its conclusion to show one of the four standard-form categorical propositions (A, E, I, or O). Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if its premises are true, what else can you infer about the conclusion? Analyze. *Note: Remember that standard-form categorical propositions use affirmative or negative u201cto beu201d verbs (e.g., is, are, am, was, were, be, been, being) in its copula to set up a connection between two classes u2014 the subject (S) and the predicate (P). COM 362 TOPIC 4 DQ 2 As you are learning about propositions and contradictions, write out a view that you hold on a social issue in propositional form (A, E, I, or O). What is the logical contradiction to your view? Identify a specific group that advocates the contradiction of your viewpoint.

18 views • 1 slides