280 likes | 462 Views
CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS DEFINITION: A DECLARATIVE SENTENCE IN WHICH SUBJECT TERM AND PREDICATE TERM ARE RELATED AS CATEGORIES.
E N D
CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS DEFINITION: A DECLARATIVE SENTENCE IN WHICH SUBJECT TERM AND PREDICATE TERM ARE RELATED AS CATEGORIES
CATEGORIES: CLASSES OF THINGS • E.G. WHALES ARE MAMMALS • S V P • SUBJECT, VERB AND PREDICATE • 5 COMPONENTS OR ATTRIBUTES OF CAT. PROPS • 1. SUBJECT, 2. PREDICATE, 3. COPULA, 4. QUANTITY, 5. QUALITY.
QUANTITY AND QUALITY • EACH PROPOSITION HAS… • QUANTITY: PARTICULAR OR UNIVERSAL • AND… • QUALITY: AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE • E.G. SOME WHALES ARE MAMMALS (PARTICULAR AFFIRMATIVE) • E.G. ALL WHALES ARE MAMMALS (UNIVERSAL AFFIRMATIVE)
THERE ARE 4 STANDARD CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS. • A: UNIVERSAL AFFIRMATIVE • E: UNIVERSAL NEGATIVE • I: PARTICULAR AFFIRMATIVE • O: PARTICULAR NEGATIVE • P.QUIZ 8.1. P. 198.
STANDARD FORM/TRANSLATING INTO STANDARD FORM • GOAL: TO PUT INTO S V P FORM AND RELATE TERMS AS CATEGORIES OF THINGS • SOME CHALLENGES: • 1. SUBJECT AND PREDICATE ARE SWITCHED • E.G. “TENDER IS THE NIGHT.” • 2. SUBJECT IS SPLIT IN TWO • E.G. “NO CODE HAS BEEN MADE THAT CANNOT BE BROKEN” • STANDARD FORM: NO CODE THAT CANNOT BE BROKEN IS A THING THAT HAS BEEN MADE
STANDARD FORM, CONT. • 3. SINGULAR TERMS • E.G. “TOM IS A GOOD BASKETBALL PLAYER.” • “NEW YORK IS A LARGE CITY.” • 4. NON-STANDARD QUANTIFIERS. • “EVERY,” “EVERYTHING,” “NOTHING,” “NONE.” • E.G. “OBJECTS HEAVIER THAN AIR MUST FALL WHEN UNSUPPORTED.”
STANDARD FORM, CONT. • SPECIAL PROBLEM: ALL S IS NOT P • E.G. ALL POLITICIANS ARE NOT CRIMINALS • RULE OF THUMB: IN MOST CASES, TRANSLATE UNIVERSAL NEGATIVE AS NO S IS P • P.QUIZ 8.2. P. 202.
CLASSICAL SQUARE OF OPPOSITION • DESCRIBES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS • LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS: • CONTRARIES • CONTRADICTORIES • SUBALTERNATES • SUBCONTRARIES
AKA: BASIC INFERENCES • PURPOSE: TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH TRUTH VALUES OF PROPOSITIONS AND MAKING INFERENCES • CONTRARIES: IF A IS TRUE, E MUST BE FALSE. • IF E IS TRUE, A MUST BE FALSE • A AND E CANNOT BE TRUE AT THE SAME TIME BUT CAN BE BOTH FALSE.
LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS, CONT. • E.G. A: ALL BREAD IS NUTRITIOUS • E: NO BREAD IS NUTRITIOUS • CONTRADICTORIES: SIMPLE: IF ANY ONE PROPOSITION IS TRUE, THE OTHER MUST BE FALSE AND VICE VERSA. • SUBALTERNATES: • SUBCONTRARIES:
LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS, CONT. • ISSUE OF INDETERMINATE TRUTH. • P.QUIZ 8.3. P. 207.
EXISTENTIAL IMPORT AND THE MODERN SQUARE OF OPPOSITION. • A DILEMMA: NOT STRESSED TOO MUCH • THE ISSUE: SOME UNIVERSAL PROPOSITIONS ARE OF SUCH A NATURE THAT WE CANNOT DRAW THE SUBALTERNATE, OR THE PARTICULAR. • OR, PARTICULAR PROPOSITIONS, LIKE I, ENTAIL THAT THE SUBJECT OR CONCEPT IS SOMETHING EXISTING.
EXISTENTIAL SQUARE CONT. • E.G. ALL UNICORNS HAVE HORNS (A FORM) • SOME UNICORNS HAVE HORNS (I) • WHICH UNICORNS HAVE HORNS? • WHEN A PROPOSITION HAS EXISTENTIAL IMPORT: • WHEN ITS TRUTH DEPENDS UPON THE EXISTENCE OF S AND/OR P, SUBJECT OR PREDICATE.
EXISTENTIAL IMPORT CONT. • ALL PARTICULAR STATEMENTS DO HAVE EXISTENTIAL IMPORT. • BUT… • E.G. ALL STUDENTS WHO MISS THREE OR MORE CLASSES WILL FAIL THE COURSE. (A) • SOME STUDENTS WHO MISS THREE OR MORE CLASSES WILL FAIL THE COURSE. (I) • CONTRADICTORIES
DISTRIBUTION • AN ATTRIBUTE OF TERMS, NOT THE PROPOSITIONS. • THE CONCEPT: WHETHER WE KNOW THE EXTENT OF THE CLASS OR CATEGORY OR NOT. • RULE OF THUMB: IF WE KNOW THE EXTENT OF THE CLASS OR CATEGORY, POSITIVELY OR NEGATIVELY, THEN WE CAN SAY THE TERM IS DISTRIBUTED. IF NOT, IT IS UNDISTRIBUTED.
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES. ALSO CALLED LOGICAL OPERATIONS. • THE IDEA: TAKING OUR FOUR STANDARD FORM CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS AND SUBMITTING THEM TO A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS. • ONE OF OUR PURPOSES: TO LEARN BASIC INFERENCE AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE CHANGED PROPOSITION FOLLOWS, IS TRUE OR LEGITIMATE (EQUIVALENT)
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • CONVERSION, THE CONVERSE. • SWITCHING SUBJECT AND PREDICATE. • E.G. SOME ENGLISHMEN ARE SCOTCH DRINKERS. • THE CONVERSE: SOME SCOTCH DRINKERS ARE ENGLISHMEN. • THIS FOLLOWS. • EQUIVALENCE AND LEGITIMACY
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • E PROPOSITION: NO WOMEN HAVE BEEN U.S. PRESIDENTS. • CONVERSE: NO U.S. PRESIDENTS HAVE BEEN WOMEN. • FOR BOTH I AND E PROPOSITIONS, THE CONVERSE FOLLOWS.
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • A FORM: ALL PICKPOCKETS ARE CRIMINALS. • CONVERSE: ALL CRIMINALS ARE PICKPOCKETS. • O FORM: SOME HUMAN BEINGS ARE NOT AMERICANS. • CONVERSE: SOME AMERICANS ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS. • FOR BOTH, A AND O, CONVERSION IS NOT LEGITIMATE. • P.QUIZ, 8.6. P. 215.
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • OBVERSION: ALL OBVERSION IS LEGITIMATE! • BASICALLY, DRAWING THE COMPLEMENT OF THE CLASS. • 2 CHANGES: • 1. REPLACE THE PREDICATE TERM WITH ITS COMPLEMENT • 2. CHANGE THE QUALITY OF THE PROPOSITION • SEE CHART P. 216.
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • COMPLEMENTS ARE NOT OPPOSITES! THEY REFER TO THE CLASS OF EVERYTHING NOT S OR NOT P. • QUIZ 8.7. P. 218. • CONTRAPOSITIVE • 2 CHANGES. • SWITCHING SUBJECT AND PREDICATE (CONVERSION) • REPLACING BOTH TERMS WITH THEIR COMPLEMENTS
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • STRUCTURE: ALL S IS P BECOMES ALL NON-P ARE NON-S. • CONTRAPOSITIVE OF A IS ALWAYS LEGITIMATE • IS NOT LEGITIMATE FOR I OR E PROPOSITIONS. • E.G. NO PRIMATE IS AN AQUATIC ANIMAL • CONTRAPOSITIVE: NO NON-AQUATIC ANIMAL IS A NON-PRIMATE. • COWS ARE NON AQUATIC ANIMALS THAT ARE NON-PRIMATES.
IMMEDIATE INFERENCES, CONT. • EQUIVALENCE!!! • DO NOT WORRY ABOUT VENN DIAGRAMS TO TEST THIS. • OUR PURPOSES: WE USE THE OBVERSION OF THE A PROPOSITION TO CAPTURE THE A FORM IN VENN DIAGRAMS. • P. QUIZ 8.8, 220