1 / 25

2013 NSS/MIC SEOUL

2013 NSS/MIC SEOUL. Questionnaire, Submissions and Registration Results & Analysis Dora Merelli – CIP & CEA/IRFU Patrick Le Dû – TNC /RITC & CNRS/IN2P3. REGISTRATION: number of attendees. Still s tabilized at around 2100 attendees.

seda
Download Presentation

2013 NSS/MIC SEOUL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2013 NSS/MIC SEOUL Questionnaire, Submissions and Registration Results & Analysis Dora Merelli – CIP & CEA/IRFU Patrick Le Dû – TNC/RITC & CNRS/IN2P3

  2. REGISTRATION: number of attendees Still stabilized at around 2100 attendees

  3. Ratio between number of REGISTRED and number of submissions Registred/submissions  Stable to 1.20 2096 registred and 1803 ‘Contributing’ participants  Paying/Abstracts = 1803/1734 = 1,04

  4. Attendees and Abstract Submission For country participants > 20

  5. Evolution of Submission/Continent • Same as 2012 • North America and Europe  40 % • Asia /Pacific 20% • Others: 2%

  6. Registered participants 30% are IEEE members

  7. Attendee Registration type • Data only for the last 3 conferences • Need for standard categories • If we take out from the total the 2 categories Staff and Exhibit Only, we obtain the following USA=538

  8. Aroundhalf are interested To Joint domains NSS/MIC/RTSD Attendees Interests USA=538

  9. 2013 Abstract Submissions Majority of submissions at the deadline – 93% of the submissions in the 2 weeks around the deadline

  10. Questionnaire Summary (592/2096) - Organization & Logistic

  11. Questionnaire Summary????/2096) Scientific Program

  12. Somecomparisons over the years

  13. Somecomparisons over the years

  14. Comparisons of programs (excellent+very good) NSS: 2012 remains the best rated MIC: very good in 2013 RTSD: growing satisfaction (except for posters)

  15. Best rating – (excellent+very good)>65% * Excellent+very good + good

  16. Someother points Coffe Breaks: lot of complaints Network Connectivity: no matter how good it is, there are always people complaining.

  17. Program

  18. Attendees Profile

  19. Other

  20. Comments – How to read the tables % of (Excellent + Very Good) Rating % of (Excellent + Very Good + Good) Rating % of (Fair + Poor) Rating

  21. Comments – NSS program

  22. Comments – MIC program

  23. Comments – RTSD Program and Joint Sessions

  24. Comments – General

  25. SUMMARYWhat to retain • Global satisfaction is excellent  94% • Stabilized to 2100 attendees (30% IEEE members) • Submissions • NorthAmerica and Europe  40% • Asia Pacific  20% • Others  2% • Attendees/submissions ratio stable to 1.20 • NSS: 2012 remains the best rated • MIC: very good in 2013 • RTSD: growing satisfaction (except for posters) • Still need to increase the quality of paper selection and less parallelism within sessions • Exhibit hall should not be too far from the scientific sessions • Some improvements could be done (coffee breaks and networking) • Over many years of statistics (average over 5 years) • Age  50 % are less than 35 and 10% above 55 • 1/3 are coming for the first time • 60% are sure to come back next year

More Related