540 likes | 676 Views
Presenter:. Mark is a Labor and Employment Attorney and Partner with the Law Firm of Seyfarth Shaw, 55 E. Monroe Street (St. 4200), Chicago, IL 60603, (312) 269-8877, mlies@seyfarth.com. He specializes in Occupational Safety and Health Law. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 1968
E N D
1. Supervisor Responsibility: Potential Civil & Criminal Liabilitypresented byMark A. Lies IISeyfarth Shaw LLP55 East Monroe Street, Suite 4200Chicago, IL 60603mlies@seyfarth.com
2. Presenter: Mark is a Labor and Employment Attorney and Partner with the Law Firm of Seyfarth Shaw, 55 E. Monroe Street (St. 4200), Chicago, IL 60603, (312) 269-8877, mlies@seyfarth.com.
He specializes in Occupational Safety and Health Law. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 1968 and DePaul University School of Law in 1974. He was a Commissioned Officer in the U.S. Navy and is a Vietnam Veteran.
9. Program Objectives Program intended to achieve following objectives:
Increase supervisor awareness of applicable law
Increase knowledge of supervisor rights and responsibilities
Improve supervisory skill levels and use of available tools and resources
Reinforce supervisors support structure
Provide refresher training on policies
10. Typical Supervisor Qualifications Productive Employee
Complies with attendance, drug and alcohol, safety and health policies
Lacks basic training in state and federal employment laws
Frequently reluctant or unaware of duty to discipline former co-employees
11. Supervisor Legal Status Agent of Employer
Able to create legal liability against employer by negligent or intentional acts
Under several laws can create supervisor personal civil and criminal liability
Employer’s failure to train supervisor is no defense
Employer must discipline supervisor for non-compliance
12. Potential Legal Liabilities Workers’ Compensation
OSHA
Tort
Criminal
Whistleblower Laws
13. Many Different Categories of Employers and Employees On-Site Owner
Owner’s Representative
General Contractor
Subcontractors
Leased Employees
Borrowed Employees
Safety Consultants
14. OSHA Liability Initially, Employer Responsible For Its Own Employees
Employer Had To Ensure That Its Employees Were Protected Against:
“Recognized Hazards” To Employee Safety and Health (General Duty Clause)
Hazards Identified In Specific Regulations (29 CFR 1926, e.g. falls, electrical, lead, silica, etc.)
15. OSHA Liability
Liability was expanded under “Multi-Employer Workplace Doctrine”
Now, each Employer is potentially responsible for the safety and health of another Employer’s Employee, if the Employer:
Creates the hazard
Exposes an Employee to the Hazard
Is responsible to correct the hazard, or
Is the controlling Employer on the site
16. OSHA Liability
An Employer may have multiple roles on the work site:
An Employer may become a “Correcting” or “Controlling” Employer under the Construction Contracts or by voluntarily assuming such duties on the work site
On December 10, 1999, OSHA issued Compliance Directive (CPL 2-0.124) setting out its citation issuance policy for multi-employer work sites
17. OSHA Liability Citations
Willful
Serious
Non-Serious
Repeat
Failure to Abate
Egregious
Each classification contains a different penalty criteria
18. OSHA Liability Employer Defenses
Unavoidable employee misconduct
Technological or economic infeasibility
Abatement creates great hazard
Lack of employee exposure
19. To Establish Unavoidable Employee Misconduct Employer had safety or health program for specific hazard
Employer trained employees
Supervisor observed work and disciplined violators; and,
Supervisor had no reasonable means to know and correct current violation
21. OSHA Liability OSHA inspections
employee rights
employer rights
OSHA rights
Employee rights
right to private one-on-one interview with inspector
right to refuse interview
22. OSHA Liability Employee rights
right to have another person present
right to end interview at any time
no duty to sign statement or be tape recorded or photographed
cannot lie to inspector
23. OSHA Liability Employer rights
right to limit inspection to complaint or accident
right to accompany inspector
right to attend non-private employee interview
no duty to produce documents not required by law
24. OSHA Liability Employer rights
right to end inspection if disruptive
right to require search warrant (should confer with senior management and legal counsel on decision)
25. OSHA Liability OSHA rights
to conduct inspection, either with consent or search warrant
right to use video camera
cannot record voice without notice and consent
right to inspect documents required by law
right to truthful responses
26. Tort Liability Negligence action for workplace accident
Wrongful death if fatality
Personal injury
Pain and suffering
Loss of income
Loss of consortium
Intentional conduct
Punitive damages
27. Tort Liability Supervisor conduct
Negligent or intentional acts create liability
Employer Liability
Initially workers’ compensation unless injury intentional
Third party liability seeking contribution or indemnity
Liability of other parties
Direct action by injured employee
28. Tort Liability Duty to preserve evidence involved in workplace accident
physical artifacts (machinery)
documents (work orders, equipment or site inspection records)
condition of equipment and premises
Potential legal liability for loss or destruction (“spoliation”) of evidence
29. Tort Liability Supervisor must ensure that condition of accident site or equipment is memorialized through photographs or other documentary means (e.g., notes , measurements)
Maintain custody and control of evidence
secure storage
chain of custody for evidence
30. Tort Liability Police and regulatory (OSHA) agencies access to evidence
police authority
OSHA subpoena
chain of custody
31. Safety Professional:“Putting it all together” Ramifications for inspections/investigations
Appropriate language when documenting safety issues
Striking a balance to report the facts and providing legal protection
32. Post Accident Investigations Important to determine root cause(s) of accident
Basis for remedial action
Potential pitfalls of report
tendency to speculate
comments may create “admissions” of liability
desire to “fingerpoint”
33. Post Accident Investigations Organize factual evidence (interviews, documents)
Consider creating legal privileges (attorney client, work product, self critical analysis)
Do not draft any report until thorough review of evidence and risks
34. Post Accident Investigations Control distribution of report to “control” group to maintain legal privilege
Document corrective action or rebuttal to conclusions in report
35. Criminal Law Liability OSHA
Potential liability if:
Fatality
Violation of specific regulation
Violation was willful, and
Violation caused fatality
Penalty
6 months imprisonment, and/or
$500,000 fine per fatality for corporation
$250,000 fine per fatality for individual
NOTE: No Miranda Warnings Necessary
36. Criminal Law Liability OSHA
Obstruction of justice for interfering with inspection
Falsification of records
Lying to federal inspector
Misrepresentation of subcontractor status to avoid OSHA liability
37. Criminal Law Liability STATE LAW
Murder
Attempted Murder
Battery
Assault
Reckless Endangerment
DOUBLE JEOPARDY
Does Not Apply
Possible Federal and State Prosecution
38. Recent Criminal Actions Scaffold collapse
Illegal asbestos removal and explosion
Illegal asbestos removal without personal protective equipment
Confined space cyanide poisoning
Excavation collapse
Electrocution involving failure to train electrical workers
Failure to provide or enforce use of personal fall arrest system
39. Competent Person Liability Capable of identifying all existing or predictable hazards (e.g., excavation, fall, electrical, etc.)
Imminent Danger – safety or health hazard poses an immediate threat of serious injury or death to employee
Hazards are identified in applicable OSHA regulations or recognized industry practices
Authorized to take prompt corrective action
44. Competent Person Liability Employer Fails
To establish qualification to identify hazards
Competent person never designated or informed
Competent person doesn’t make frequent and regular inspections
Competent person never takes corrective action or is ignored
45. Whistleblower Laws Potential Employer Liability If:
Employee engages in “Protected Activity” (e.g., makes complaint about safety or health violation to Employer; files complaint with OSHA; participates in OSHA inspection), and
Employee Suffers “Adverse Action” (e.g., termination, discipline, loss of benefits), and
46. Whistleblower Laws
Employer takes Adverse Action and Retaliates against Employee because of Protected Activity
Employee may File 11(c) Complaint with OSHA seeking damages
OSHA will investigate complaint
47. Whistleblower Laws
If OSHA finds reasonable cause that there was retaliation, case may be filed in Federal Court
All States have Whistleblower Laws that may apply
48. Site Scenarios Supervisor observes contractor employees in unsafe activity
contact contractor supervisor immediately to inform of hazard
(demand/request/inform) that supervisor immediately remove employees from hazardous areas
(demand/request/inform) prompt corrective action
Imminent Danger – demand that subcontractor employees immediately exit hazardous area
document incident for formal corrective action
49. Site Scenarios Supervisor observes Company employee failing to wear personal protective equipment (PPE)
immediately stop employee from working
remove employee from exposure to hazard
provide appropriate PPE
issue discipline to employee and document
conduct retraining of employee