1 / 53

INGRID MC

INGRID MC. Data vs MC plot. Compare at some distribution after neutrino event selection. Normalized by POT (10^18 pot) Data set Data : Run32 (7.64 10^18 pot) MC : Jnubeam 10b, NEUT MC include numu, numubar, nue, nuebar Plot of only horizontal modules

selena
Download Presentation

INGRID MC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INGRID MC

  2. Data vs MC plot • Compare at some distribution after neutrino event selection. • Normalized by POT (10^18 pot) • Data set • Data : Run32 (7.64 10^18 pot) • MC : Jnubeam 10b, NEUT • MC include numu, numubar, nue, nuebar • Plot of only horizontal modules • About numubar, nue and nuebar, only horizontals

  3. # of active plane

  4. # of active plane

  5. p.e. / active layer

  6. p.e. / active layer

  7. vertex Z (plane)

  8. vertex Z (plane)

  9. Vertex X (channel)

  10. Vertex X (channel)

  11. Angle

  12. Angle

  13. Horn 270kA • Jnubeam 10b, Cross-section (NEUT) • Calc neutrino selection efficiency of INGRID from numu MC interaction Data. • Calc the efficiency from only the horizontal modules MC data.

  14. Neutrino energy spectrum of horizontal(Flux)

  15. Module 0 Module 1 Module 2 Module 3

  16. Module 4 Module 5 Module 6

  17. Energy spectrum ofhorizontal modules(only numu)

  18. Draw energy spectrum at each module at each step • Neutrino interaction within modules • Observation by INGRID with neutrino event selection • Only numu interaction • Interaction → observation の順番

  19. All horizontal modules

  20. All horizontal modules (low energy)

  21. module 0

  22. modules 0 (low energy)

  23. module 1

  24. module 1 (low energy)

  25. module 2

  26. module 2 (low energy)

  27. module 3

  28. module 3 (low energy)

  29. module 4

  30. module 4 (low energy)

  31. module 5

  32. module 5 (low energy)

  33. module 6

  34. module 6 (low energy)

  35. Expected observed events (numu) Target : Fe, horn 270kA → horizontal sum = 7.43+-0.01×10^6 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 7.82+-0.01×10^6 / 10^21pot Total : 1.53+-0.002 × 10^7 / 10^21pot

  36. Expected observed events (numubar) Target : Fe, horn 270kA → horizontal sum = 2.96+-0.02×10^5 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 3.18+-0.02×10^5 / 10^21pot Total : 6.14+-0.03 × 10^5 / 10^21pot

  37. Expected observed events (nue) Target : Fe, horn 270kA → horizontal sum = 6.09+-0.04×10^4 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 6.53+-0.04×10^4 / 10^21pot Total : 1.26+-0.005 × 10^5 / 10^21pot

  38. Expected observed events (nuebar) Target : Fe, horn 270kA → horizontal sum = 5.87+-0.07×10^3 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 6.26+-0.07×10^3 / 10^21pot Total : 1.21+-0.01 × 10^4 / 10^21pot

  39. Compare of # of observations Data vs MC (horn 270kA) • Beam data : all physic run data • MC data : Jnubeam Flux10b × Cross-section(NEUT) × INGRID neutrino efficiency • Sum # of numu, numubar, nue, nuebar event • Consider the scintillator mass ( scale up × 1.038) • Normalized by POT • This result dose not include systematic error. • MC statistics error is about 0.1%

  40. Horn 320kA • Jnubeam 07a, Cross-section (NEUT) • Calc neutrino selection efficiency of INGRID from numu MC interaction Data. • Calc the efficiency from only the horizontal modules MC data. • Use the numu efficiency for expected # of events at numubar, nue, nuebar (cannot prepare the MC sample, assume the efficiency curve is not so different)

  41. Expected observed events (numu) → horizontal sum = 8.66+-0.007×10^6 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 8.79+-0.007×10^6 / 10^21pot Total : 1.75+-0.001 × 10^7 / 10^21pot

  42. Expected observed events (numubar) → horizontal sum = 2.78+-0.008×10^5 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 2.93+-0.008×10^5 / 10^21pot Total : 5.71+-0.01 × 10^5 / 10^21pot

  43. Expected observed events (nue) → horizontal sum = 8.16+-0.03×10^4 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 8.60+-0.03×10^4 / 10^21pot Total : 1.68+-0.004 × 10^5 / 10^21pot

  44. Expected observed events (nuebar) → horizontal sum = 6.35+-0.07×10^3 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 6.29+-0.07×10^3 / 10^21pot Total : 1.26+-0.01 × 10^4 / 10^21pot

  45. Compare of # of observations Data vs MC (horn 320kA) • Beam data : all physic run data • MC data : Jnubeam Flux07a × Cross-section(NEUT) × INGRID neutrino efficiency (numu) • Sum # of numu, numubar, nue, nuebar event • Consider the scintillator mass ( scale up × 1.038) • Normalized by POT • This result dose not include systematic error. • MC statistics error is 0.1%

  46. Horn 0kA • Jnubeam 09c, Cross-section (NEUT) • Calc the neutrino selection efficiency of INGRID from numu MC interaction sample. • Calc the efficiency from only the horizontal modules MC sample. • Use this numu efficiency for expectation # of events at numubar, nue, nuebar (no time to prepare the MC sample. Assume the efficiency curve is not so different, if the efficiency depends mainly neutrino energy)

  47. Expected observed events (numu) → horizontal sum = 1.76+-0.003×10^6 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 1.80+-0.003×10^6 / 10^21pot Total : 3.57+-0.004 × 10^6 / 10^21pot

  48. Expected observed events (numubar) → horizontal sum = 4.30+-0.01×10^5 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 4.45+-0.01×10^5 / 10^21pot Total : 8.74+-0.01 × 10^5 / 10^21pot

  49. Expected observed events (nue) → horizontal sum = 3.07+-0.02×10^4 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 3.09+-0.02×10^4 / 10^21pot Total : 6.16+-0.03 × 10^4 / 10^21pot

  50. Expected observed events (nuebar) → horizontal sum = 7.81+-0.08×10^3 / 10^21pot → vertical sum = 7.44+-0.07×10^3 / 10^21pot Total : 1.53+-0.01 × 10^4 / 10^21pot

More Related