1 / 18

A SEMINAR REPORT ON INTERPLANTERY INTERNET

A SEMINAR REPORT ON INTERPLANTERY INTERNET. INTRODUCTION. CCSDS (CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEM) NASA (NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION) DSN (DEEP SPACE NETWORK) PROTOCOLS FOR MARS EXPLORATION.

selima
Download Presentation

A SEMINAR REPORT ON INTERPLANTERY INTERNET

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A SEMINAR REPORT ON INTERPLANTERY INTERNET

  2. INTRODUCTION CCSDS (CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEM) NASA (NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION) DSN (DEEP SPACE NETWORK) PROTOCOLS FOR MARS EXPLORATION

  3. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION • TCP/IP NOT WORK AT INTERPLANATORY DISTANCE DUE TO DELAY • WHAT IS COMMUNICATION CHANNEL • REQUIREMENT OF IPN BACKBONE • SCHEDULING OF RESOURCE REQUIRED “TIME-SYNCHRONIZATION”

  4. IPN OPERATING ENVIRONMENT • DIFFERENCE OF IPN AND TERRESTRIAL COMMUNICATION • DELAY • LOW AND ASSYMETRY OF BANDWITH • HIGH BIT ERROR RATE • INTERMITANT CONNECTIVITY

  5. BANDWITH FOR IPN IS MODEST COMPARE TO TERRESTRIAL COMM. • DIFFICULTY TO GENERATE POWER CAUSE HIGH BIT ERROR RATE • IPN WILL IN NEAR FEATURE BE KNOWN AS INTERMITANT CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN PLANET

  6. NAME CONTAINS ADMINISTRATIVE & ROUTING PART • DNS ( DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM )  NAME INTO NUMERIC ADDRESS 1  ZONE TRANSFER TECHNIQUE 2  TOP LAVEL DOMAIN “.SOL”TRANSFER TECHNIQUE

  7. ROUTING PART IDENTIFIED PARTICULAR INTERNET • NAME  {ADMINISTRATIVE , ROUTING} • ROUTING  ANY IPN NODE • ADMINISTRATIVE  ADDRES IN IPN NODE • EX. { WWW.IPNSIG.ORG , EARTH.SOL }

  8. BUNDLE LAYER TERMINATES LOCAL TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS • STORE – AND – FORWORD MICHANISM • SCHEDULE OF NODES • INTRUPT TRAFFIC • DATA HOLD AT HIGER LAYER • TO TERMINATE LOCAL TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS

  9. INFORMATION CARRIED BY BUNDLE LAYER • BUNDLE IDENTIFIER • REMOTE ENTITY NAME • SOURCE ENTITY NAME • AUTHANTICATION INFORMATION • SIZE OF DATA • TIME – TO – LIVE

  10. TO TRANSFER DATA FROM EARTH  MARS 1BUNDLE CREATION AND FIRST HOPE DESTINATION 2BUNDLE PROCESSING AT FIRST HOPE DESTINATION { IPNGW1.JPL.NASA.GOV , EARTH.SOL } 3BUNDLE FROM G\W TO DESTINATION IPN REGION { IPNGW2.NASA.MARE.ORG , MARS.SOL } 4BUNDLE PROCESSING AT DESTINATION

  11. SECURITY IN IPN • ASSUMPSION REGARDING REQUIRED IPN SECURITY MECHANISM. • SECURE E-MAIL TECHNOLOGY. • APPLICATION OF SECURE E-MAIL TECH TO THE IPN. • PROTECTING IPN DATA & IPN INFRASTRUCTURE.

  12. ASSUMPTION REGARDING REQUIRED IPN SECURITY MECHNISM • ACCESS CONTROL. • AUTHENTICATION. • DATA INTEGRATY. • DATA PRIVACY. TWO SECURITY PARADIGM. • HOP BY HOP PARADIGM. • END TO END PARADIGM.

  13. SECURE E-MAIL TECHNOLOGY • USE OF PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY. SOME PROBLEM • QUITE CONSUMPTIVE OF PROCESSOR POWER • CONSUMPTIVE AS A BANDWIDTH

  14. APPLICATION OF SECURE E-MAIL TECH.TO IPN • THE MASSEGE CONTENTS ARE “CONTAINERISED”. • BODY PART CONTAIN ENCRYPTED SYMMETRIC KEY & INFO. NEEDED FOR ENCRYPTION. • CERTIFICATES CONTAIN DIGITAL SIGNED PUBLIC KEY.

  15. PROTECTING IPN DATA AND INFRASTRUCTURE • VARIOUS INFRASTRUCTURE INFO. NEED TO PROTECTION. • BUNDLE AGENT MIGHT ENCRYPT FOR HOP-BY-HOP SECURITY PROTECTION.

  16. BUILDING A STABLE BACKBONE FOR IPN • BACKBONE – A SET OF HIGH CAPACITY, HIGH AVAILABILITY LINK BETWEEN POINT OF ACCESS TO HIGH ACTIVITY SUBNETS. IPNTERRESTRIAL • MEDIA OF RF OR COPER WIRE OR TRANSMISSION OPTICAL OPTICAL FIBER • NATURE OF OPERATIONAL, STRUCTURAL & CONNECTIVITY DIRECTLY,DYNAMIC STATIC • COST HIGHER LOWER

  17. BACKBONE DESIGN CONSIDERATION • BANDWIDTH IS NOT FREE OR EVEN CHEAP. • INTERACTIVE PROTOCOL DON’T WORK AT LEAST NOT WELL. • LONG HOUL PROTOCOL & BUNDLE PROTOCOL. • OPERATE CLOCK SYNCHRONISATION.

  18. CONCLUSION • WE NEED TO USE A “PONY-EXPRESS” MODEL. • CURRENT ADVANCE LIKE MOBILE IP,SCPC,RDI & THEIR ENVIRONMENT WILL USE IN THESE ENVIRONMENT.

More Related