1 / 8

Faculty Senate Retreat – 9/3/10

Faculty Senate Retreat – 9/3/10. UT Compensation Advisory Board Center for Renewable Carbon Faculty Handbook Review. Compensation Advisory Board. 14-member state-wide advisory board to help guide the University’s compensation philosophy, structure and programs.

selma
Download Presentation

Faculty Senate Retreat – 9/3/10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Faculty Senate Retreat – 9/3/10 • UT Compensation Advisory Board • Center for Renewable Carbon • Faculty Handbook Review

  2. Compensation Advisory Board 14-member state-wide advisory board to help guide the University’s compensation philosophy, structure and programs.

  3. Membership: Administrators, Faculty and Staff Representatives • Every campus and institute has a representative Representing UT Knoxville: • Dr. Susan Martin • Dr. Toby Boulet • Ms. Margie Russell • Resources for the Board: Human Resources: Linda Hendricks and Priscilla Bright General Counsel: Catherine Mizell and Brian Lapps Communications: Meredith LeCroy

  4. Charged by President – March, 2010 Charge The scope of the board is advisory in nature, recommending to the President’s staff changes to compensation philosophy, policies and practices. Responsibilities include: • Review and identification of best total compensation practices • Review of UT policies and programs • Development of a multi-year compensation strategy (market, equity, incentive and retention) • Identification of long-term strategies and practices for improvement • Identification of quick wins/successes for employees

  5. Progress From First Two Meetings Engaged national compensation consultant • Review of best practices • Review of current state and recommendations for improvement • Recommended survey of state and regional markets first (including TBR and state employees) Reviewed UT’s current compensation program • Compensation philosophy • Market relationship for direct pay and benefits • Policies, programs and pay practices • HR strategic plan and initiatives related to pay and benefits

  6. Progress From First Two Meetings Cont’d Looked for “quick wins” • Review employee suggestions from EEF and • Develop website and newsletter to keep employees informed of our work Developed “Employer of Choice” model • Continuum stages: misalignment foundation building supportive and promising EMPLOYER OF CHOICE • Use model to measure our progress Focus of October meeting • Update compensation philosophy and gain support from senior leaders • Review survey of state and regional markets; determine other surveys • Identify “quick wins” for employees

  7. Center for Renewable Carbon

  8. Faculty Handbook – Time Frame of Non-Tenure-Track Appointments 4.1.3 Non-Tenure-Track Clinical Positions All non-tenure-track clinical appointments will be made for a definite term of one year or less. Appointments are renewable subject to availability of funds and satisfactory performance. 4.1.2 Non-Tenure-Track Research Positions All non-tenure-track research appointments will be made for a definite term of one year or less, subject to continued availability of external funding. Appointments are renewable subject to continued availability of external funding and satisfactory performance.

More Related