1 / 40

A Palliative Care Approach for breathlessness in lung cancer

A Palliative Care Approach for breathlessness in lung cancer. A clinical evaluation. Background to evaluation. Anecdotal evidence in day care – good results Establishment of a formal evaluation in a palliative care setting Formal study commenced April 1999 Aimed to recruit 30 patients

senta
Download Presentation

A Palliative Care Approach for breathlessness in lung cancer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Palliative Care Approach for breathlessness in lung cancer A clinical evaluation Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  2. Background to evaluation • Anecdotal evidence in day care – good results • Establishment of a formal evaluation in a palliative care setting • Formal study commenced April 1999 • Aimed to recruit 30 patients • Data collection completed September 2000 • Report published 29th June 2001 Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  3. Aims of the evaluation The study was designed to answer the following questions; • Can breathlessness or the unpleasant awareness of breathlessness in lung cancer patients be significantly reduced with the use of a non-pharmacological approach? • Can this intervention improve quality of life in this client group? • Does this approach have any other significant effect on symptom control, apart from breathlessness? • Does this approach improve functional ability (and therefore independence) in this client group? Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  4. Referral criteria Inclusion criteria • Patients with small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or mesothelioma • Patients with breathlessness one month or more after completion of active treatment • Chest x-ray within one month Exclusion criteria • Patients undergoing active treatment • Diagnosis other than lung cancer • Patients with pleural effusion Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  5. Method • Operational policy established • Referrers, consultant oncologists; consultant chest physicians; clinical nurse specialists; Physiotherapists; GP’s • Clinicians; Physiotherapist and key worker (specialist palliative care nurse) • Patient seen 3 times over a period of 4/6 weeks • Assessment tools/outcome measures Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  6. Content: • Detailed patient breathing assessment • Exploration of patients feelings about their illness and symptoms • Training in breathing control techniques such as slow breathing, diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation training • Advice on managing attacks of breathlessness • Advice on coping with activities of daily living Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  7. Hurdles related to illness and treatment: • Uncertainty • Search for meaning • Contributing to survival • Maintaining self esteem • Being open with others • Maintaining contact with others • Obtaining medical support • Loss of body part or function • Radiotherapy or chemotherapy (Maguire and Howell 1995) Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  8. Key questions: • How do you see your illness working out? • Have you been able to come up with any explanation as to why you should have become ill in this way? • Have you found there is anything you can do to contribute to your survival? • Has having cancer changed in any way how you feel about yourself as a person? • Have you been able to be open with others abut having cancer? • Have you been seeing as much of other people as you did before your illness? • How do you feel about the level of support you have been receiving form the doctors and nurseswho have been looking after you? (Maguire and Howell 1995) Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  9. Clinician Assessment tools: • Current respiratory symptoms (MRC respiratory symptom questionnaire and dyspnoea scale) • Functional capacity scale • Sputum production scale Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  10. Patient assessment tools: • Rotterdam symptom checklist • Activity questionnaire • Things which improve breathlessness • Quality of life questionnaire • Breathlessness visual analogue scale Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  11. Evaluation results • Patient demographics • Respiratory function • Functional capacity • Symptom assessment • Degree of breathlessness • Strategies which improve breathlessness • Quality of life Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  12. Patient numbers: • 68 patients referred • 45 entered • 30 assessed • 15 died or deteriorated before completion Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  13. Patient characteristics: • Age range 35 to 81 years • 24 male; 6 female • 16 NSCLC; 3 SCLC; 10 mesothelioma • 73% prior RT • 27% prior surgery • 10% prior chemotherapy • 10% no active treatment Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  14. Medication Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  15. Current respiratory symptoms:How often are you breathless? • Most/all the time • Several times a day • Once or twice a week • Several times a week • Once a week • Less than once a week Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  16. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  17. Respiratory symptoms: results • Significant improvement (p<0.001) • At baseline 27% were breathless most of the time compared to 3% at completion • 19 patients improved • 9 remained stable • 2 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  18. Functional capacity: • Climb hills or stairs without breathlessness • Walks any distance on the flat without breathlessness • Walks > 100 yards without breathlessness • Breathlessness on walking < 100 yards • Breathlessness on mild exertion • Breathlessness at rest Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  19. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  20. Functional capacity: results • Improved (p<0.001) • At baseline only 37% could walk more than 100 yards compared to 77% at completion • 21 patients improved • 7 remained stable • 2 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  21. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  22. Changes in symptoms: Rotterdam symptom checklist • 36 questions about symptoms in the last week • Includes physical symptoms and psychological distress • Scored as not at all (1), a little (2), moderately (3) or very much (4) • Separate activity questionnaire (8 items) scoring 1(able to do) to 4 (unable to do) • Low scores desirable Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  23. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  24. Physical symptom distress score: results • Improved (p=0.01) • 20 patients improved • 2 remained the same • 8 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  25. Psychological symptom distress score: results • Borderline improvement (p=0.06) • 18 patients improved • 4 remained the same • 8 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  26. Activity level score: results • Improved (p<0.001) • 24 patients improved • 3 remained the same • 3 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  27. Degree of breathlessness: How breathless have you felt in the last 24 hours when your breathing has been at its best and at its worst?How much distress has your breathing caused? • Visual analogue scales • 0 (none) to 10 (extremely) • Low scores desirable Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  28. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  29. Breathlessness at best: results • Improved (p=0.001) • 16 patients improved • 12 remained the same • 2 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  30. Breathlessness at worst: results • Improved (p<0.001) • 27 patients improved • 3 remained the same Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  31. Distress caused by breathlessness: results • Improved (p<0.001) • 26 patients improved • 1 remained the same • 3 deteriorated Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  32. Identifying strategies which might improve perception of breathlessness • Patients were asked to score 20 strategies • Visual analogue scales • 1 (not at all helpful) to 10 (extremely helpful) • Physical strategies • Specific taught breathing techniques • Psychological strategies Significant improvements in 17/20 Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  33. Quality of life • 21 questions on QOL in previous week • 1 to 10 visual analogue scale • Values high or low dependent on question • Significant improvements in hours per day lying down, bodily strength and things which made patients happy • Biggest improvements in ability to do as wanted and overall quality of life Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  34. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  35. Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  36. Patient satisfaction survey: • Who referred you to the clinic? • How long have you been breathless? • Who have you sought help from for your breathlessness? • How long did you wait for your first appointment? • Appointment length and frequency • Were you given enough information and explanation? • Were you given enough time to express your needs and concerns? • Has the treatment been helpful? • Contact with the clinic • Clinic environment Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  37. Patient satisfaction: results • 57% of patients breathless > 6 months • 80% seen within 1-2 weeks • Appointments just right for 97% • 100% satisfaction with information, explanation and time given • 93% chose hospice environment Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  38. Summary of results: • Frequency of dyspnoea:Improved • Degree of breathlessness: improved • Functional capacity: improved • Physical symptoms and activity levels: improved • Quality of life: improved • Patient satisfaction high • Large drop out rate due to deterioration or death • Sputum production and medication: unchanged (Hately et al 2001) Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  39. Recommendations: • Working Group for Lung Cancer 1998: Breathlessness clinics should be an integral part of care for all lung cancer patients. • Referral at onset of symptom • Education and training • Further research (Hately et al 2001) Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

  40. Lewis-Manning House: • Breathlessness clinic fully established by September 2000 • New referral criteria • Continuing to collect data • Funding remains a problem • Integration of breathlessness clinic philosophy into Day care • Dissemination of information: Breathlessness study programme held biannually at Lewis-Manning House; talks at Bournemouth university and Poole Hospital • Evaluation of breathlessness clinic philosophy on other cancer patients experiencing breathlessness Author: C A Belchamber - April 2002

More Related