1 / 3

Predictivity of Lipids for CVD Mortality: LRC Program Follow-up Study

Predictivity of Lipids for CVD Mortality: LRC Program Follow-up Study. Cui Y et al. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1413-1419. LRC Follow-up Study: CVD Mortality by Non-HDL-C and LDL-C in Men. Non–HDL-C Rate/ (mg/dL) 10,000 <160 38.0 160 to <190 43.0 190 to <220 53.9 > 220 80.6.

seoras
Download Presentation

Predictivity of Lipids for CVD Mortality: LRC Program Follow-up Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Predictivity of Lipids for CVD Mortality: LRC Program Follow-up Study Cui Y et al. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1413-1419.

  2. LRC Follow-up Study: CVD Mortality by Non-HDL-C and LDL-C in Men Non–HDL-C Rate/ (mg/dL)10,000 <160 38.0 160 to <190 43.0 190 to <220 53.9 >220 80.6 LDL-C (mg/dL) <130 40.2 130 to <160 48.2 160 to <190 54.9 >190 71.3 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 RR with 95% CI LRC = Lipid Research Clinics; RR = Relative risk; CI = confidence interval. Cui Y et al. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1413-1419.

  3. LRC Follow-up Study: CVD Mortality by Non-HDL-C and LDL-C in Women Non–HDL-C Rate/ (mg/dL)10,000 <160 17.6 160 to <190 26.5 190 to <220 29.2 >220 51.3 LDL-C (mg/dL) <130 25.4 130 to <160 22.8 160 to <190 27.7 >190 40.1 0 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 RR with 95% CI LRC = Lipid Research Clinics; RR = Relative risk; CI = confidence interval. Cui Y et al. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1413-1419.

More Related