1 / 15

Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation

Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation. Organising co-operation. Most large German cities have their own department for statistics and urban research to support urban planning.

september-dunlap
Download Presentation

Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Organising co-operation Most large German cities have their own department for statistics and urban research to support urban planning. KOSIS-Verbund – established in 1981 – is an open association of more than 100 European, mainly German municipalities and public institutions promoting the municipal statistical information system. Cities and other public institutions co-operate in self-governing sub-groups to develop statistical tools and organise urban data collections. The KOSIS association for the Urban Audit is one of them. http://www.statistik.nuernberg.de/urban-audit

  2. Urban Audit data collection The Urban Audit is organised by the KOSIS association of UA cities, in co-operation with Federal and State statistics. In Germany, half the city data to be collected and all sub-city data are provided by the cities or estimated by them from state statistics. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation

  3. Co-operative analysis of the UA with “Dashboard” *) - 1 - Comparison between cities *) European Statistical Laboratory of the Commission’s Joint Research Centre JRC Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation

  4. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Co-operative analysis of the UA with “Dashboard” *) -2- Comparing aspects of one city *) European Statistical Laboratory of the Commission’s Joint Research Centre JRC

  5. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation German cities’ long tradition in perception surveys Number of German UA-cities recently asking citizens about their perception of Source: Difu – German Institute for Urban Affairs

  6. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation “Coordinated perception survey on the quality of life in DE cities” • Initiated by the KOSIS association of Urban Audit cities • Managed by a sub-group of VDSt, the association of German municipal statisticians, chair of the sub-group: Ulrike Schoenfeld-Nastoll, Oberhausen • Involving 15 cities not included in the EU sample • Conducted by IFAK institute at the same time (Nov.-Dec.2006) as the survey of the EU, with the same questions, same method (telephone interviews), sample size 500 - 1200 per city • DG Regio and the German cities group agreed to exchange the data for combined comparisons. • The cities can make their own analyses, in addition to common evaluations. • Repeated attempts to encourage similar projects in other countries remained without success, so far.

  7. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Cleanliness & satisfaction to live in this city – „Co-ordinated perception survey“ Strongly disagree 1.6 Saarbrücken Wiesbaden Darmstadt Frankfurt am Main Satisfaction to live in this city (mean) 1.5 Oberhausen Bremen Köln Koblenz Braunschweig 1.4 Heidelberg Stuttgart Nürnberg Strongly agree r= .664 Konstanz Dresden Freiburg 1.3 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Strongly agree This is a clean city (mean) Strongly disagree (mean) quality of life Fitted values Source: Stefanie Neurauter, Anke Schöb, Ulrike Schönfeld-Nastoll – presentation in Gera 2007

  8. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Green space area per capita and citizens‘ satisfaction – UA data and “Co-ordinated perception survey“ Proportion “very satisfied” Green space area per capita Source: Stefanie Neurauter, Anke Schöb, Ulrike Schönfeld-Nastoll – presentation in Gera 2007

  9. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Satisfaction with cultural facilities – “Coordinated perception survey” Koeln 45,5 Size of city Frankfurt 49,0 Stuttgart 60,3 450.000 - 1.000.000 Bremen 35,5 Nuernberg 45,8 Dresden 60,2 Wiesbaden 37,0 Braunschweig 41,8 180.000 - 300.000 Oberhausen 34,7 Freiburg 49,4 Saarbruecken 31,9 Heidelberg 29,5 80.000 - 150.000 Darmstadt 40,8 Koblenz 31,3 % very satisfied Anteil sehr zufrieden Konstanz 27,2 0% 25% 50% 75% Source: Stefanie Neurauter, Anke Schöb, Ulrike Schönfeld-Nastoll – presentation in Gera 2007

  10. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation DE sample EU sample

  11. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation disagree agree

  12. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Top agree-ment disagree agree Least agree-ment

  13. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Conclusions • Nothing can generate awareness for necessary actions better than a demonstration of strengths and weaknesses by comparison. • Co-operation creates comparability and can lead to even more effective surveys. “I feel safe / rather safe” Source: Bureau for Statistics and Urban Research “Living in Nuremberg” 2005

  14. Comparison across cities – the example of German co-operation Thank you for listening! …any questions? For further information please visit the German Urban Audit cities website: http://www.statistik.nuernberg.de/urban-audit or send an e-mail to Klaus Trutzel via kum.trutzel@t-online.de

More Related