1 / 23

PACE Collaborative Mechanical and Electrical Engineers

Street Lighting Review City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. PACE Collaborative Mechanical and Electrical Engineers. Street Lighting Review City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. A few Facts … 48,277 Street Lighting Fixtures $5.4 Million Per Year to DVP (ltg) LED’s Are Changing the Rules.

sgiles
Download Presentation

PACE Collaborative Mechanical and Electrical Engineers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Street Lighting Review City of Virginia Beach, Virginia PACECollaborative Mechanical and Electrical Engineers

  2. Street Lighting Review City of Virginia Beach, Virginia A few Facts … • 48,277 Street Lighting Fixtures • $5.4 Million Per Year to DVP (ltg) • LED’s Are Changing the Rules

  3. Street Lighting Review Evaluate Current procedures Evaluate Costs Interview other Cities Interview the stakeholders, City, DVP, Mfrs, Installing Contractors Consider alternate methods and costs 1. City Owned and Maintained 2. City Owned, Contract Maintenance A. Existing Streets B. New Construction Measured and Analyzed City Pilot Projects Researched the Market … Technology, Efficacy, Pricing Determine …What can be done to reduce costs ?

  4. Efficacy of Light Sources

  5. HPS LED Universal Custom

  6. Compare Various Street Lighting Fixtures 2 DVP LED 1 DVP HP Sodium 3 Hi Efficiency LED 4 Hadco RX2 5 Beta STR 6 Dialight Lumens per Watt (Miles per gallon)

  7. White vs. Yellow Light Spectral Weighting Scotopic / Photopicratio IES and DOE Positions

  8. Measurements … Light Output vs. Power Input Miles per Gallon

  9. Issues of Ownership • Initial Cost • Energy Cost • Repair / Replacement Cost • Staffing and Equipment • Storage of spare poles and fixtures • Metering Complexities • Transfer of ownership of existing assets • Consider “City” maintenance vs. Contractor maint

  10. A A. Pole With DVP DistributionOwnership and Maintenance Complex

  11. B B. Pole Without DVP DistributionOwnership and Maintenance is Less Complex

  12. A Specific Project Princess Anne Road Expansion Previously Designed for DVP provided Lighting Considered City Ownership and Maintenance Street Lighting Latest Technology Best Efficacy Available 10-year industry standard warranty Considered multi-year maintenance contract C C. New Roadway ConstructionOwnership and Maintenance is Cost Effective

  13. Princess Anne Road Street LightingCompare - As Designed vs. Alternative ** This cost from DVP contract based on established Rate Schedule SSL **

  14. Princess Anne Road Street LightingCompare - As Designed vs. Alternative

  15. A Few Findings … • Higher Efficiency Lighting Fixtures exist … than DVP’s • That efficiency is not reflected in DVP rates • City ownership of NEW PROJECT Street lighting • Can save money • 3. City takeover of existing fixtures is complex and costly • 4. Tracking and Reporting of DVP System is Vague • 5. Fragmented understanding of the procurement system • 6. Dark Sky compliance is desirable among stakeholders • 7. Color temperature 4000 - 4500 K is desirable among stakeholders

  16. A A. Pole With DVP DistributionOwnership and Maintenance Complex

  17. Past Conversions Fairfield, CA Kennewick, WA (8,000) (6,000) Salt Lake County, UT (3,000) Cupertino, CA Oakland, CA (3,000) (37,000) Pomona, CA (4,500) Walla Walla, WA Vacaville, CA (600) (6,600) Hayward, CA Pasadena, CA (8,000) (6,500) (# of Fixtures)

  18. PEPCO Rocky Mountain PG&E SoCal Edison BG&E PECO Arizona Public Service Salt River Project San Diego Gas & Electric District of Columbia Utah California California Maryland Pennsylvania Arizona Arizona California Energy-Only Flat Rates

  19. Maintenance HPS / MV LED / IND 20% 1% Comparison of Annual Percentage of Fixtures Requiring Maintenance HPS = High-Pressure Sodium Vapor MV = Mercury Vapor LED = Light-Emitting Diode IND = Induction

  20. Savings 250W $ 17.32 $ 7.87 $ 3.32 70W $ 8.33 $ 2.23 $ 0.97 Current After Buyout* After LED Conversion Comparison of Monthly HPS Per Fixture Fees * Based on Current Schedule 25 from Virginia Electric & Power Co.

  21. Simple Payback $0 Upfront Cost 10 – 11 Year Payback Avg Annual Savings* $108k $650k $2.9m Year 1 Year 10 Year 20 * Based on the average savings calculated for the Cities of Chesapeake, Hampton, and Norfolk.

  22. Buyouts Washington, D.C. Oakland, CA San Jose, CA Arlington, TX Salt Lake County, UT San Luis Obispo, CA West Valley City, UT Rochester, NY Arcata, CA San Jose, CA Chula Vista, CA

  23. Contact Info Jason Tanko, BSEE, MBA President, Tanko Lighting jason@tankolighting.com Phone: 415.254.7579 Fax: 415.822.3626 www.tankolighting.com John DeVan, PE, LEED AP PACE Collaborative, P.C. john@pace-pme.com Phone: 757.499.7223 www.pace-pme.com

More Related