CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal

1. CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS, Thomas.Maher@Colostate.edu, 1-1325 Andre’ Smith, Manager, CSS-OIS, Andre.Smith@Colostate.edu, 1-1325

2. Outline • Background • Classrooms – status regarding technology • Peer institutions • Current project • Status • Budget • Proposed project • Scope – proposed rooms • Budget projection • 3-yr. plan • Analysis – “fit” with UTFAB funding criteria • Q&A Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

3. Background

4. CSU GA Classrooms Status • 154 total GA (General Assignment) classrooms at CSU • All have Internet access • 85 have technology (55% by May ‘05) • Still insufficient number to meet a growing demand • Need more mid to small-sized classrooms with computer projection systems • Many have old, dim projectors and older optics • New computer projector technology can avoid expensive lighting modifications Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

5. Comparison to Peers – GA Classrooms with Technology • CU Boulder has 160 GA classrooms – about the same number as CSU • About 100 (63%) have computer projectors • About 30 of these (20%) have “all the bells and whistles” • AHEC in Denver has 100% of GA classrooms equipped with technology Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

6. Status of Current Project for FY 05 (this year)

7. FY 05 Project Approved by UTFAB • Refresh technology in 5 smart classrooms where old technology exists • New projectors are brighter and sharper, and function with modern laptop computers • To avoid maintenance and repair problems • Mixture of upgraded projectors, document cameras, podiums, control systems, etc. • Build 11 new smart classrooms by adding computer projection systems • Total – $117K Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

8. Implementation Status • New smart classrooms completed: • Wagar 231 and 232 • Engineering D102, E204 and E205 • Clark A07, Gifford 332 • Scheduled for completion by May ‘05: A/Z 112, Animal Science 110 and 112, and Forestry 107--All equipment on hand Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

9. Implementation Status (cont’d) • Refresh of technology completed in Eddy 113-117 • Additional technology refresh completed in Aylesworth 111, Chemistry A101 and 103, Clark C248 and Education 7 from an UTFAB supplemental request • Eddy 7, Pathology 101, Glover 130 and Engineering 120 will be completed by June Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

10. QUESTIONS? Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

11. Proposed Project for FY 06

12. Classroom Prioritization • Physical Development Plan (PDP) Process • Departments prioritize their PDP elements and forward to their Vice President (VP) • Each VP reviews department submissions, establishes their priorities and forwards to the University PDP Committee • The University PDP Committee reviews VP submissions, and establishes University priorities • Classroom elements are forwarded to the Classroom Review Board (CRB) for their recommendations and actions Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

13. Classroom Prioritization (cont’d) • The CRB prioritizes and allocates resources to projects • Due to budget cuts, all CRB resources are consumed by non-IT elements • Chairs, lighting, carpeting, white boards, ADA, etc. • CRB recommendations integrated into the University physical I&IT prioritization process • Building rewires, classrooms, and wireless nets • UTFAB Chair on CRB. Agenda/Minutes on Web www.ois.colostate.edu/CRB/index.html Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

14. Proposed New Smart Rooms - Technology Upgrades Note: The Clark A rooms are “clicker” installs Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

15. Proposed Smart Classrooms for Technology Refresh The technology refresh are new computer projectors in Clark A wing that replace projectors from 1998-2001 Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

16. FY 06 Technology Upgrades Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

17. FY 06 Technology Refresh Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

18. Summary of Proposal for FY 06 • 6 rooms for new technology • 7 rooms for technology refresh • 1182 student seats total, a mix of large and smaller classrooms • The need continues to be great Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

19. Additional Proposal for FY 06 • 2 New Smart Classrooms • 1 Large Classroom Upgrade • 5 Classrooms to replace button panels with touch screens • Total = $39,964 Note: Original UTFAB Classroom Funding at ~ $175,000 Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

20. Proposed New Smart Rooms - Technology Upgrades Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

21. Proposed Smart Classrooms for Technology Refresh Microbiology A101 would be a full replacement of the components, and the other rooms are touch panels Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

22. University Cost Share • Complete VTH $583,000 • Physiology $135,000 • Gen Svcs Bldg $109,000 • Spruce Hall $51,000 • Painter Center $51,000 • Industrial Sc. $17,000 Total $946,000 Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

23. Initial Ratings for Building Rewires * Substantially completed. ** Partially completed.

24. 3-Year Plan

25. 3-Year Plan or Process • UTFAB consider continuing funding technology in classrooms for 3 additional years, for both some new rooms and some technology refresh • 27 New rooms (7 annually plus 6 in FY06) • 31 rooms for technology refresh (8 annually after 7 in FY06) • 120 (78%) total smart rooms by Fall 2009 Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

26. UTFAB Funding Criteria • Benefit as many students as possible • Est. 3,600+ students will pass through these classrooms in any single semester. Clark rooms add approx. 15,000/semester • CSUIITE eventually will benefit all students, faculty and staff • Current rewire proposal benefits campus: the network is bi-directional • Ability to effectively utilize the fee - judgment • Not funded by CFT - correct • Adherence to budget and accountability – quotations for classroom equipment • Potential for direct student use - judgment • Effort and thought reflected in the plan - judgment • Justification and clarity of the project plan - judgment Classroom Technolopgy Proposal

27. Summary Thank you for your support. Discussion and questions are most welcome. Classroom Technolopgy Proposal