140 likes | 266 Views
Student Fee Review Board Technology Fee Proposal. Presentation to the IT Cabinet Information Technologies Classroom Technology Moira Gerety, Deputy Cio, Acting Director Classroom Technologies October 6TH, 2014. Student Technology Funding Approach. Be responsive to Student needs Surveys
E N D
Student Fee Review BoardTechnology Fee Proposal Presentation to the IT Cabinet Information Technologies Classroom Technology Moira Gerety, Deputy Cio, Acting Director Classroom Technologies October 6TH, 2014
Student Technology Funding Approach • Be responsive to Student needs • Surveys • Focus Group • Student Employees • Focus on the Student experience • More central funding to drive consistency • Keep up by leveraging cloud/vendor options • Mask complexity: reduce “instances” of same • Support Student Success Initiatives • Collaboration tools • OneDrive • LoboAchieve • PCAS • Invest primarily in “the common good” • Serves the entire student body • Allow buy-in for dedicated services so solutions are not duplicated • Champion mobility • Lobo-mobile (a start) • Student App contest • Social • Continually improve outreach • Develop appropriate funding sources
Student IT Fee Comparison * Educause Core Data Survey, 2013
2014-2015 SFRB Budgeted Expenditures(with swap in place) • $1,968,907
Matching Student Tech Survey Text Results to Priorities via Student Input • Survey timing to be changed to Spring for earlier SFRB deadline • Student continue to want …. • And software tools …….
ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Technology, 2014 • http://cio.unm.edu/evaluation/ecar-students-and-technology-highlights-2014.html
2015-2016 SFRB Request • $2.1 million (includes $100K one-time request)
Student Equipment Checkout Funding Request • Start Up Funding for Equipment Checkout to students • Laptops, tablets for class, study, collaboration • Build toward inventory so faculty can build curriculum knowing students will have computer access in classroom if desired • AV Checkout by Semester
Wireless Strategy • Focus where students are • Centrally scheduled classrooms • Commons areas • Networking budget to focus on “11 worst buildings” • 2014 overlap was the SUB • 2015 to increase density in Dane Smith, Mitchell
Additional Student Staff • Additional spaces are being adopted • Athletics, WRC, GPSA lab, GRC, El Centro, African American SS, EPS, CAPS, Honors in process • Computer Labs/Pods • # Computers in Pods = 940 • Average Age of Computers = 2.5 years old • Number of Computer Classrooms = 27 • Number of Computer Labs/Pods = 16 • Lectern PCs for instructors = 140 • Pawprints release stations • CTLB (Fall 2013) • EPS (Fall 2013) • Law Library (2) (Spring 2014) • SUB Color Printing (Spring 2014)
OUTCOMES (new) $100K checkout devices for 1x1 program Student workshops $100K student staffing to support more environments $300K wireless in classrooms for 1x1 program http://pawprints.unm.edu/locations.html (20)
In Conclusion • IT continues to strive for: • Adequate funding for student technology • Transparency in direction and investment • Collaborative planning and projects • Thank you for your consideration