1 / 21

Achievement of CIS Interoperability – NATO Policy and Processes

Achievement of CIS Interoperability – NATO Policy and Processes. Dick Whittingham NATO HQ C3 Staff Principal Technical Co-ordinator. OUTLINE. Framework Expeditionary Reality Vision. FRAMEWORK - POLICY. NATO C3 System Interoperability Policy NATO C3 System Interoperability Directive (NID)

shakti
Download Presentation

Achievement of CIS Interoperability – NATO Policy and Processes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Achievement of CIS Interoperability – NATO Policy and Processes • Dick Whittingham • NATO HQ C3 Staff • Principal Technical Co-ordinator

  2. OUTLINE • Framework • Expeditionary Reality • Vision

  3. FRAMEWORK - POLICY • NATO C3 System Interoperability Policy • NATO C3 System Interoperability Directive (NID) • NATO C3 System Architectural Framework (NAF) v2 • Guiding Principles for C3 System Interoperability Experimentation, Test and Validation (IETV) in support of NATO Response Force (NRF) and NATO Network Enabled Capability (NNEC)

  4. DEFENCE PLANNING PROCESS (EXTRACT) BASELINE ARCHITECTURE TARGET ARCHITECTURES REFERENCE ARCHITECTURES RESOURCE PLANNING -SRB (NATO FUNDED PROGRAMMES) C3 NNEC CAPABILITY TO MATCH NATO NEEDS C3 REQUIREMENTS FORCE PLANNING – DRC (NATIONS’ CAPABILITIES) ARMAMENTS PLANNING - CNAD (MULTINATIONAL PROGRAMMES) C3 OVERARCHING ARCHITECTURE

  5. CATEGORISATION SOURCE NC3B NHQC3S ANALYSIS/ IOR DIRECTION ANALYSIS DEFINE IOR NATIONAL CONTRIBUTION FEEDBACK FEEDBACK IOR RESOLUTION BY APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY E.G. NEW STANDARDS NEW NEW FIELDED PROCEDURES CAPABILITY NATO C3 INTEROPERABILITY PROCESS IOR IOR SOURCES DEFENCE PLANNING PLANNING LESSONS LEARNED NATIONAL PROGRAMMES SUPPORT TO CERTIFICATION OF FORCES INTEROPERABILITY TESTING

  6. NATO C3 TESTING CYCLE IOTR NCT RESULTS CATEGORISATION PROCESS MASTER TEST SCHEDULE OF NATO IOTRS TEST EVENT MATCHING NATO, NATIONAL AND CO-OPERATIVE TEST EVENTS NATOINTEROPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS NIETI FEEDBACK NC3 PORTAL NIE IT

  7. EXPEDITIONARY OPERATIONS - CHALLENGE ACO JFC HQ SOCC DCAOC NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES APOD SPOD HQ NATO NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES DJTF HQ AIR CC HQ DCAOC APOD SPOD NATO TASK FORCE MARITIME CC HQ LAND CC HQ INFORMATION FLOW Static Deployed

  8. EXPEDITIONARY OPERATIONS - CHALLENGE ACO JFC HQ SOCC DJTF HQ NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATO TASK FORCE NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES AIR CC HQ NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES HQ NATO DCAOC APOD SPOD MARITIME CC HQ LAND CC HQ Static Deployed

  9. INTEROPERABILITY STATUS – OPERATION XXX

  10. EXPEDITIONARY REALITY – PROVIDES: • Focus for Interoperability Experimentation and Test: • NIETI Core Team co-ordinate test activity • NATO Coalition Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (CWID), Steadfast Cathode, [Combined Endeavor] • NC3A IETV capability development and use • Basis for NC3B Interoperability Sub-Committee to identify and solve interoperability challenges with Joint Force Commanders (JFCs) • Basis for ACT, NC3O and Industrial experimentation to enhance technical capability

  11. VISION • Progressive move to NNEC capability • One to network paradigm • Uniformity and ‘standardization’ • Architectures • Standards and profiles • NATO Maturity Level (NML) models • Test and Certification • Process improvement

  12. NETWORKING AND INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE (NII) ACO JFC HQ NII Static NATO STATIC STRUCTURE SOCC Deployed DCAOC APOD DCAOC SPOD HQ NATO NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES DJTF HQ AIR CC HQ APOD SPOD NATO TASK FORCE ALTMD ACCS MARITIME CC HQ LAND CC HQ NATIONAL CAPABILITY NATIONAL CAPABILITY

  13. NNEC CAPABILITY AREAS- NII ARCHITECTURE USERS AND MISSIONS SERVICE MANGE- MENT CONTROL INFOR- MATION ASSUR- ANCE COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST INFORMATION & INTEGRATION SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES Overarching Architecture NII Enterprise Reference Architecture Community of Interest RA

  14. VISION • NATO C3 System Architectural Framework (NAF) v3 (currently draft) • NATO architecture Meta-Model (NMM) • NATO Architecture Repository (NAR) • NAR linked with NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles (NISP) (former NC3TA) repository, the NML repository and the NATO Interoperability Environment (NIE) Interoperability Tool

  15. NAF V3 PERSPECTIVES AND VIEWS NATO CAPABILITY VIEW NATO ALL VIEW NATOOPERATIONALVIEW NATOPROGRAMMEVIEW NATO SERVICES VIEW NATOSYSTEM VIEW NATOTECHNICALVIEW

  16. TEST AND CERTIFICATION • Provinginteroperable capability is critical for success • Good progress so far, but more needed • Knowledge and process baseline enhancement - NC3A • Improved linkage to Force certification • Willingness of Nations to offer the right equipment at the right time

  17. PROCESS • The processes are complex • Process cohesion essential for capability delivery (especially NNEC) • Key activities: • Document process: use architectures • Provide consistent requirement baseline • Prove capability: document solutions

  18. CONCLUSION • Interoperability is a challenge, especially for expeditionary operations: but we are making progress! • It is a challenge for everyone • Process and architecture developments are key to progress NNEC associated improvement • Progress depends upon Nations’ willingness to follow standardized solutions and to expend effort on testing.

More Related