1 / 20

Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit

Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit. Lee Tomlinson The University of Manchester IOP Liverpool 8 – 10 April 2013. The van der Meer method. Proportional to luminosity, R ( h ).

shakti
Download Presentation

Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of transverse coupling on the ATLAS luminosity calibration in the Gaussian beam limit Lee Tomlinson The University of Manchester IOP Liverpool 8 – 10 April 2013

  2. The van der Meer method Proportional to luminosity, R(h) The vdMmethod allows one to calibrate the absolute luminosity scale by scanning the beams past one another. S. van der Meer, Calibration of the effective beam height in the ISR. oai:cds.cern.ch:296752, Tech. Rep. CERN-ISR-PO-68-31, CERN, Geneva, 1968. Beam separation, h Implicitly assumes factorisation of x and y components! How does (linear) x-y correlation in the beam affect this method? Lee Tomlinson

  3. The single-Gaussian model This is the single-Gaussian bunch parameterisation where and The luminosity in this model is proportional to In the absence of explicit beam crossing angle Lee Tomlinson

  4. Two illuminating examples Different beam sizes Beam 1 Beam 1 x-y correlation Beam 2 Beam 2 Lee Tomlinson

  5. Scanning beams of different size Beam 2 Beam 1 Luminous region follows the bulk of the narrow beam as it scans the wider beam Scan in horizontal direction Lee Tomlinson

  6. Scanning x-y correlated beams Beam 2 Beam 1 Movements of luminous region is transverse to scan direction Scan in horizontal direction Lee Tomlinson

  7. Movements of the luminous centroid Lee Tomlinson

  8. July 2012 scan (6) data ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Lee Tomlinson

  9. July 2012 scan (6) data ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Lee Tomlinson

  10. 1 Constraints(July 2012 scan 6) ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Lee Tomlinson

  11. 1 Constraints(July 2012 scan 6) ATLAS work in progress Widths are uncertainties on measured Σvalues 1 Similarly for the y-width constraints ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Lee Tomlinson

  12. 1 Constraints(July 2012 scan 6) ATLAS work in progress 2 κ is correlation coefficient ATLAS work in progress 1 ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Similarly for the y position during x scan From direct measurement of luminous region correlation Lee Tomlinson

  13. 1 Constraints(July 2012 scan 6) ATLAS work in progress 2 κ is correlation coefficient Small allowed region in correlation space, consistent with zero 1 ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Uncertainties from constraints in (1) are propagated to band widths in (2) Lee Tomlinson

  14. Explicit beam crossing angle …has been included in the model, essentially functioning as an x-z and a y-z correlation. …vdM scan III (3) in April 2012 “Significant” crossing angle ATLAS work in progress Lee Tomlinson

  15. Conclusions • Permits a fully-analytic approach. Soluble with series solution about small correlation. • Systematic method for constraining all beam parameters without boot-strapping, iterating, etc. • Arbitrary crossing-angle easily incorporated, retaining analyticity. • Applied to vdM scans in Oct ’10, Mar ’11, May ’11, Apr ’12 and Jul ’12. • Consistently suggests impact of (linear) transverse coupling on luminosity calibration is negligible. • One of the systematic contributions that enters an unprecedented 1.8% luminosity error at ATLAS. • On-going work: Further models have been explored in detail, which successfully account for many of the non-linear features observed in the data. Lee Tomlinson

  16. Backup slides Lee Tomlinson

  17. Successes and limitations ATLAS work in progress ATLAS work in progress Non-linear tails cannot be described using single-Gaussian model Crossing angles are easily implemented in single-Gaussian model Lee Tomlinson

  18. Further models and work in progress Double Gaussian Super Gaussian Further models have been explored in detail, which successfully account for many of the non-linear features observed in the data. An analytical approach is not always possible, as with the single-Gaussian model. Work is based on solving these as far as possible. Lee Tomlinson

  19. Scanning beams of different size Beam 2 Beam 1 Luminous region follows the bulk of the narrow beam as it scans the wider beam Higher negative separation Centred Higher positive separation Lee Tomlinson

  20. Scanning x-y correlated beams Beam 2 Beam 1 Movements of luminous region is transverse to scan direction Higher negative separation Centred Higher positive separation Lee Tomlinson

More Related