1 / 16

Data for Target Setting and Monitoring

Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant. Data for Target Setting and Monitoring. Course: Using CEM data in Practice Day 2 Session 3 Wed 30 th May 2012. Peter.Hendry@cem.dur.ac.uk. Data for Target Setting and Monitoring. What type of predictive data should be used to set the targets?

shaman
Download Presentation

Data for Target Setting and Monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant Data for Target Setting and Monitoring Course: Using CEM data in Practice Day 2 Session 3 Wed 30th May 2012 Peter.Hendry@cem.dur.ac.uk

  2. Data for Target Setting and Monitoring What type of predictive data should be used to set the targets? • Points and/or Grades • Nationally standardised baseline • Independent sector standardised baseline (MidYIS only) • Prior value-added (MidYIS, Yellis and Alis) • Chances graphs

  3. Case study 1: setting targets. • Uses valid and reliable data e.g chances graphs • Involves sharing data with the students • Gives ownership of the learning to the student • Enables a shared responsibility between student, parent(s)/guardian, and the teacher • Encourages professional judgement • Leads to the teachers working smarter and not harder • Leads to students being challenged and not ‘over supported’, thus becoming independent learners…

  4. CASE STUDY No. 1 Value Added 2009

  5. CASE STUDY No. 1

  6. CASE STUDY No. 1

  7. CASE STUDY No. 1 Prediction/expected grade: 5.4 grade B/C Most likely grade

  8. CASE STUDY No. 1 Prediction/expected grade: 6.2 grade B Most likely grade

  9. CASE STUDY No. 1

  10. CASE STUDY No. 1

  11. Alis predictive data

  12. Alis predictive data

  13. Alis predictive data

  14. Point ‘predictions’ to GCSE (National) Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Point ‘predictions’ to GCSE (Independent) Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 • Compare the ‘predictions’ for National and Independent sector. • What pattern do you notice?

  15. Student 4 Prediction/expected grade: 5.0 grade C

  16. INDEPENDENT SECTOR Student 4 Prediction: 5.8 grade B

More Related