1 / 31

Formation of the First Stars

Seminario Italia-Giappone. Formation of the First Stars. Kazuyuki Omukai (NAO Japan). First Stars:. proposed as an origin of heavy elements Sun 2%, metal poor stars 0.001-0.00001% Cause of early reionization of IGM t e =0.17 z reion =17 (WMAP).

shaman
Download Presentation

Formation of the First Stars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seminario Italia-Giappone Formation of the First Stars Kazuyuki Omukai (NAO Japan)

  2. First Stars: • proposed as an origin of heavy elements Sun 2%, metal poor stars 0.001-0.00001% • Cause of early reionization of IGM te=0.17 zreion=17 (WMAP) Depend on mass /formation rate of first stars Let’s study their formation process !

  3. SIMPLE Before the First Stars • Cosmological initial condition (well-defined) • Pristine H, He gas, no dusts, no radiation field (except CMB), CR simple chemistry and thermal process • No magnetic field (simple dynamics) After the First Stars COMPLICATED • Feedback (SN, stellar wind) turbulent ISM • metal /dust enriched gas • radiation field (except CMB), CR • complicated microphysics • magnetic field MHD

  4. First Objects（３s） ｚ～30, M～106Msun Tvir～3000K cool by H2 Formation of First Objects: condition for star formation • Hierarchical clustering small objects form earlier • Condition for star formation radiative cooling is necessary for further contraction and star formation Tegmark et al. 1997

  5. Easy Microphysics of Primordial Gas Radiative cooling rate In primordial gas • Atomic cooling only effective for T>104K • Below 104K, H2 cooling is important • H2 formation (H- channel: e catalyst) H + e -> H- +g H- + H -> H2 + e Efficient cooling for T>1000K

  6. Simulating the formation of first objects 600h-1kpc Yoshida, Abel, Hernquist & Sugiyama (2003) ab initio calculation is already possible !

  7. Road to the First Star Formation 1 1. Formation of the First Object 95%known

  8. Road to the First Star Formation 2 2. Fragmentation of the First Objects 50%known

  9. Fragmentation of First Objects 3D numerical simulation is getting possible 3D similation (Abel et al. 2002,Bromm et al. 2001) filamentary clouds (Nakamura & Umemura 2001) Typical mass scale of fragmentation; Dense cores a few x 102-103Msun no further fragmention Bromm et al.. 2001 These cores will collapse and form protostars eventually.

  10. Road to the First Star Formation 3 3. Collapse of Dense Cores: Formation of Protostar 60% known

  11. g=1.1 Pop III Dense Cores to Protostars: Thermal Evolution cooling agents: H2 lines (log n＜14) H2 continuum (14-16) becomes opaque at log n=16 H2 dissociation (16-20) （K.O. & Nishi 1998) Temperature evolution approximately, g =d log p/d log n= 1.1

  12. Pop III Dense Cores to Protostars: Dynamical Evolution （K.O. & Nishi 1998) protostar formation state 6; n~1022cm-3, Mstar~10-3Msun （~Pop I protostar） self-similar collapse up to n~1020cm-3 Tiny Protostar

  13. 3D simulation for prestellar collapse • The 3D calculation has reached n~1012cm-3 (radiative transfer needed for higher density; cf. n~1022cm-3 for protostars) • Overall evolution is similar to the 1D calculation. • The collapse velocity is slower. (why? the effect of rotation, initial condition, turbulence) Abel, Bryan & Norman 2002

  14. Road to the First Star Formation 4 4. Accretion of ambient gas and Relaxation to Main Sequence Star 25% known

  15. Density Distribution at protostar formation (For hot clouds, the density must be higher to overcome the stronger pressure and form stars.) Density around the primordial protostar is higher Than that around prensent-day counterpart. This difference affects the evolution after the protostar formaition via accretion rate.

  16. Mass Accretion Rate After formation, the protostars grow in mass by accretion. The accretion rate is related to density distribution (the temperature in prestellar clumps): Pop III T~300K Mdot ~ 10-3 – 10-2Msun/yr Pop I T~10K Mdot ~ 10-6 - 10-5Msun/yr The accretion rate is very high for Pop III protostars

  17. Protostellar Evolution in Accretion Phase Protostellar Radius ３ｂ、expansion １、adiabatic phase tKH >tacc 2, KH contr. ３a, ZAMS (K.O. & Palla 2003) • Nuclear burning is delayed by accretion. • (H burning via CN cycle at several x10Msun) • Accretion continues in low Mdot cases, while the stellar wind prohibit further accretion in high Mdot cases.

  18. Critical accretion rate Total Luminosity (if ZAMS) Exceeds Eddington limit if the accretion rate is larger than In the case that Mdot > Mdot_crit, the stars cannot reach the ZAMS structure with continuing accretion.

  19. How much is the Actual Accretion Rate ? From the density distribution around the protostar… Abel, Bryan, & Norman (2002)

  20. Protostellar Evolution for ABN Accretion Rate Evolution of radius under the ABN accretion rate • The protostar reaches ZAMS after Mdotdecreases < Mdot_crit. • Accretion continues…. • The final stellar mass will be 600Msun.

  21. Pop I vs Pop III Star Formation Pop I core Mstar : 10-3Msun Mclump: >0.1Msun Mdot: 10-5Msun With dust grains Pop III core Mstar : 10-3Msun Mclump : >103Msun Mdot : 10-3Msun No dust grain Accretion continues. Very massive star formation (100-1000Msun) Massive stars (>10Msun) are difficult to form.

  22. a 2nd generation star found ! Most iron-deficient star HE0107-5240 [Fe/H]=-5.3 • Iron less than 10-5 of solar; Second Generation • Low-mass star ~0.8Msun What mechanism causes the transition to low-mass star formation mode? Christlieb et al. 2002

  23. Key Ingredients in 2nd Generation Star Formation • Metal Enrichment • UV Radiation Field from pre-existing stars • Density Fluctuation created by SN blast wave, stellar wind, HII regions

  24. Metals from the First SNe Heger, Baraffe, Woosley 2001 • Type II SN 8-25Msun • Pair-instability SN 150-250Msun SN II PISN

  25. Metals and Fragmentation scales K.O.(2000), Schneider, Ferrara, Natarajan, & K.O. (2002) • Formation of massive fragments continues until Z~10-4Zsun (If radiation not important) • For higher metallicity, sub-solar mass fragmentation is possible.

  26. Radiation pressure onto dusts if kd>kes, radiation pressure onto dust shell is more important. => massive SF • This occurs ~0.01Zsun • For Z<0.01Zsun Accretion is not halted

  27. Metals and Mass of Stars 10-2Zsun 0 10-5Zsun Zsun Massive frag. Low-mass frag. possible Accretion halted by dust rad force Accretion not halted Massive stars Low-mass & massive stars Low-mass stars

  28. Photodissociation Effects of UV Radiation Field Star Formation in Small Objects (Tvir < 104K) (K.O. & Nishi 1999) • Only one or a few massive stars can photodissociate entire parental objects. • Without H2 cooling, following star formation is inhibited. Only One star is formed at a time.

  29. Fragmentaion scale vs UV intensity FUV radiation effect on fragmentation scale Star formation in large objects (Tvir>104K) K.O. & Yoshii 2003 Evolution of T in the prestellar collapse radiation：　Jn=W Bn(105K) from massive PopIII stars • log(W)=-15 ; critical value • W＜WcritH2 formation, and cooling • W>Wcrit no H2 （Lyα –– H- f-b cooling) • Fragmentation scale • H2 cooling clumps （logW < -15） Mfrag~2000-40Msun • Atomic cooling clumps(logW > -15) Mfrag~0.3Msun In starburst of large objects, subsolar mass Pop III Stars can be formed. Fragmentaion scale decreases for stronger radiation

  30. Effects of SN blast wave (Wada & Venkatesan 2002; Salvaterra et al. 2003) • SNe of metal-free stars (Umeda & Nomoto 2002) SN II (10Msun-30Msun; 1051 erg) pair instability SN (150Msun-250Msun; 1053erg) • Shell formation by blast wave fragmentation of the shell low-mass star formation? Bromm, Yoshida, & Hernquist 2003

  31. Conclusion • Typical mass scale of the first stars is very massive ~102-3Msun, because of • large fragmentation, • continuing accretion at large rate However, the conclusion is still rather qualitative. • Formation of the second generation of stars is still quite uncertain. Metallicity/ radiation can induce the transition from massive to low-mass star formation mode.

More Related