490 likes | 520 Views
The formation of stars and planets . Day 4, Topic 3: Agglomeration of particles Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond. Dust coagulation. Main planet formation scenario. Dust particles in disk stick and form aggregates Aggregates continue to grow until gravity becomes important (planetesimals)
E N D
The formation of stars and planets Day 4, Topic 3: Agglomeration of particles Lecture by: C.P. Dullemond
Dust coagulation Main planet formation scenario • Dust particles in disk stick and form aggregates • Aggregates continue to grow until gravity becomes important (planetesimals) • Planetesimals agglomerate via gravitational interactions and form rocky planet • Two ways from here: • Stays a rocky planet (like Earth) • Accretes gas and becomes Jupiter-like planet
From dust to planets Observable with DARWIN TPF etc. Observable in visual, infrared and (sub-)mm ? 1m 1km 1000km 1mm 1m
Grain coagulation • What happens upon collision? • They stick (creating a bigger aggregate) • They stick and compactify • They bounce • They mutually destroy each other • How many collisions? / What is evolution of dust? • Brownian motion • Turbulence • Big grains settle to the midplane and sweep up small grains • Big grains move on Kepler orbits, small grains are mixed with gas (slightly sub-Keplerian) • Radial migration of grains at different speeds
Grain coagulation • What happens upon collision? • They stick (creating a bigger aggregate) • They stick and compactify • They bounce • They mutually destroy each other • How many collisions? / What is evolution of dust? • Brownian motion • Turbulence • Big grains settle to the midplane and sweep up small grains • Big grains move on Kepler orbits, small grains are mixed with gas (slightly sub-Keplerian) • Radial migration of grains at different speeds Microphysical (“molecular dynamics”) modeling / laboratory experiments Dominik & Tielens (1997), Dominik & Nübold (2002) / Blum et al. (2000) Poppe, Blum & Henning (2000) Global dust evolution modeling (with distribution functions) based on a model of disk structure Weidenschilling (1980, etc) Nakagawa & Nakazawa (1981) Schmitt, Henning & Mucha (1997) Mizuno, Markiewicz & Völk (1988) Tanaka et al. (2005) Dullemond & Dominik (2005)
Growth is aggregation of “monomers” Compact • Produced by particle-cluster aggregation, if anything • Lowest possible /m, i.e. fastest settling velocity • /m ∝m-1/3
Growth is aggregation of “monomers” Compact Porous • Produced by particle-cluster aggregation • Higher /m than compact ones, i.e. slightly slower settling • /m ∝m-1/3
Compact Porous Fractal Growth is aggregation of “monomers” • Produced by cluster-cluster aggregation (hierarchical growth) • Very high /m, i.e. very slow settling • /m ∝m with-1/3<<0
Modeling of grain-grain collision Carsten Dominik
Modeling of grain-grain collision Carsten Dominik
Modeling of grain-grain collision Carsten Dominik
Modeling of grain-grain collision Carsten Dominik
Modeling of grain-grain collision Carsten Dominik
Magnetic aggregation Carsten Dominik, Hendrik Nübold
Coagulation equation Size distribution function (discrete version): = Number/cm3 of aggregates with i monomers Hit and stick between aggregates: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 mass
= Cross-section for collision between i and k = Average relative velocity between i and k = Total number of size-bins modeled Coagulation equation The coagulation equation (discrete form) becomes: Problem with this approach: Need 1030 bins... Impossible!!
The coagulation equation becomes: Coagulation equation Introduce continuous distribution function: Number of particles per cm3 with mass between m and dm Now make discrete bins, with bin width m ~ m. This way each logarithmic mass interval is equally well spaced!
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation Equator
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Sedimentation-driven coagulation One-particle model
Parallel with weather on Earth Rain falling from a cumulus congestus cloud
Parallel with weather on Earth Rain falling from a cumulus congestus cloud
Parellel with weather on Earth Cumulonimbus cloud, most probably with severe hail
Parellel with weather on Earth Layered structure of giant hail stone
Parellel with weather on Earth Hierarchical structure of giant hail stone
Time scale problem • Growth at 1AU up to cm size or larger proceeds within 1000 years • Virtually all the small grains get swept up before 10.000 years • Seems to contradict observations of T Tauri and Herbig Ae/Be star disks
What could save the small grains? • Porous / fractal grains settle slower • Grain charging reduces sticking probability • Accretion replenishes small grains • Highly reduced turbulence in dead zone
Porous grains: one-particle model Porosity does not prolong time scale!!
Porous grains: one-particle model Porosity only makes end-products larger/heavier
Fragmentation of grains • Dust aggregates are loosely bound (van der Waals force between monomers) • Collision speed decisive for fate of aggregate: • Slow velocity collision: sticking • Intermediate velocity collision: compactification • High velocity (>1m/s) collision: desintegration (Blum et al.; Dominik et al.) • Extremely simple model treatment: if(v>1m/s) then destroy (put mass back into monomers)
Collisional cascade in debris disks Thebault & Augereau (2003)