90 likes | 282 Views
How to protect your mining investment? Some views on stabilisation clauses. Bertrand Montembault Avocat au barreau de Paris, Herbert Smith LLP PDAC MineAfrica 2010, Toronto, 9 March 2010. Protecting investment through the stabilisation of the legal environment.
E N D
How to protect your mining investment?Some views on stabilisation clauses Bertrand Montembault Avocat au barreau de Paris, Herbert Smith LLP PDAC MineAfrica 2010, Toronto, 9 March 2010
Protecting investment through the stabilisation of the legal environment • Risks faced by the mining industry: geological, financial, environmental and political / legal • It is necessary to mitigate these risks in order to attract investors (mining companies, financiers, etc.) • At the core of political/legal risks: sovereignty of State vs. sanctity of contract • A key element to mitigate political/legal risks: stabilisation of the legal environment
Protecting investment through the stabilisation of the legal environment • Mechanisms available to stabilise the legal environment: • Treaties (BITs) • Statutes (mining laws, investment laws, etc.) • Legal doctrine (e.g. French administrative law: act of state (fait du prince, State's liability arising from enactment of laws) • Contract with the state: stabilisation clauses
Stabilisation clauses: back to basics • Clauses stabilising the non-legal environment: general contract law • Force majeure clause • Hardship clause • Renegotiation clause • Adjustment clause (revision clause) • Purpose of stabilisation clauses: neutralisation of the State's legislative power • Stabilisation clauses vs. "intangibility clause" • Stabilisation clauses vs. non-expropriation clause • Need to neutralise the State's jurisdictional power (arbitration clause) • Need to establish contractual relationship with the State
Protecting investment through the stabilisation of the legal environment • Validity • International arbitration cases (Texaco, Calasiatic, Aminoil, Agip, Saphire, etc.) • Applicable law clauses: internationalisation of contract • Typology • Legal nature: freezing (stabilisation "stricto sensu" or stability) / economic equilibrium / hybrid clauses • Scope: general / limited • Unilateral / bilateral • Implementation: automatic / conditional
Freezing clauses (stabilisation "stricto sensu" / stability): a criticised tool • Perception • Developed countries / emerging countries (36% in Sub-Saharan Africa) • Industry sectors (50% extractive industries) • Would limit State's capacity to legislate in human rights matters (HSE): appointment of John Ruggie as Special Representative to the UN Secretary General • Limited legal efficiency: no specific performance / award of damages • Similar protection may be achieved by other means, less harmful to the State's sovereignty: • BITs • Economic equilibrium clauses
Freezing clauses (stabilisation "stricto sensu" / stability clauses): a useful tool in the context of the resurgence of resource nationalism • Efficiency of freezing clauses established through: • Characterisation of State's breach of contract • Principle of higher indemnification seems to be admitted ("damnum emergens" + "lucrum cessans") but the solutions are not yet clearly established : "legitimate expectations" (Aminoil 1982), "fair market value" (CMS Gas Transmission 2005/SD Meyers) • Uncertainties arising from: • Notion and implementation of economic equilibrium clause (no arbitration case known) • Creeping expropriation • A useful reference to bear in mind: domestic (administrative) law