130 likes | 266 Views
Sudan CHF 2012 1 st Round Sector Defense Sector: HEALTH Jan 17 th , 2012. CHF Sector Priorities. Maintain and improve access to primary and secondary health care to vulnerable populations such as IDPs, returnees, refugees, and disaster affected areas
E N D
Sudan CHF 2012 1st Round Sector Defense Sector: HEALTH Jan 17th, 2012
CHF Sector Priorities • Maintain and improve access to primary and secondary health care • to vulnerable populations such as IDPs, returnees, refugees, and • disaster affected areas • B. Strengthen emergency preparedness, response and outbreak • control including environmental health activities • .
CHF Geographical Priorities A. Darfur States (North , West and South Darfur) B. 3 Protocol Areas (Abyei, Blue Nile and South Kordofan|) C. Eastern States
Sector strategy for addressing the priorities • A- Establish and maintain the provision of minimum basic package of • health services • Minimum package : Treatment of common diseases, Follow up of pregnant women and Immunization • B- Ensure the availability of essential medicines, medical supplies and • diagnostic kits. • C- Strengthen service provision for the Accelerated Child Survival • Initiative • D- Improve capacity of health staff for improved performance in • curative and preventive interventions. • E- Monitor and coordinate interventions in order to ensure adequate • targeting and avoid duplication, and build partnerships
What evidence supports your identified priority needs? Include targeted beneficiary population 6,704,000 million is the health sector target population. Health priority needs has been collected through specialized health sector tools: • HeRAMS (Health Resources Availability Mapping System) • EWARS (Early Warning and Alert Response System) • ESP (Emergency State Profile)
Management of Health Facilities Functioning Health Facilities, Oct 2011
Why is CHF funding critical right now to meet these sector priorities? (i.e. Answer what would happen without funding for 6 months) • Health is a life saving sector. • Impaired capacity to respond to disease out breaks (within 72 hours) • Loss of health staff and reporting sites. • (80% reporting compliance required by surveillance system) • Deteriorated maternal and child health conditions • (Complications of pregnancy and labour need to be addresses within few hours ) • Provision of essential life saving drugs
How were value for money and low indirect costs ensured? • Proportion of direct/indirect cost: as a sector over 30% was considered high indirect cost • B. For Value for money the TRG looked the following factors: • - Providing specialty services in a high need/gap area • - Sole service provider in a high need area • C. Increased number of national NGOs appropriate to needs • D. Core pipelines • E. Timely response to emergency outbreaks
Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Recommended Sector Envelope: USD9,955,216 Total requested amount: USD 20,810,210 Total projects: 18 projects (out of 36 submitted projects) Recommended UN/NGO/NNGO percentage: UN: 42% INGO:30% NNGO:11% CP:17% Approach to determining project allocation amounts (NOT scoring methodology) Geographical coverage was then looked at to ensure that all target areas have been covered
Summary of TRG-endorsed proposals Total Recommended Sector Envelope versus historical trend or basis for envelope 2011: 8,800,000 (1st Round + core pipeline)