CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENC E

1. CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE

2. Hearsay Evidence • Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated in court.

3. Hearsay Evidence General Rule: Isgenerally considered Inadmissible because it isUnreliable because: • No opportunity to assess competencyorcredibilityof the original declarant. • No opportunity for cross-examination. • Noguaranteeoftruthfulness.

4. Hearsay Evidence HearsayException= admissible hearsay. LegalFoundation= elements that make up the hearsay exception. Test For Trustworthiness= legal reason which overcomes the general unreliability of the hearsay.

5. Hearsay Exception Admissions & Confessions: • Peace officer or private citizen can testify to the content of an admission or confession made by the accused. Admission: statement from the accused acknowledging a fact of relevant evidence (not amounting to a confession) Confession: statement from the accused acknowledging guilt “I did it” Legal Foundation: statement must be legallyobtained (“402 motion”). Test for Trustworthiness: a person would not make a statement adverse to one’s penalinterests unless that statement were true.

6. Hearsay Exception Spontaneous Statement: Legal Foundation: • ExcitedUtterance - A statement made during or shortly after a crime or incident that was likely to arouse the emotions of a reasonable person. 2) Contemporaneous or close in timewith the occurrence of the crime or incident (while the victim or witness is still “under the influence “ of the event). 3) About what the declarant saw or otherwise perceived.

7. Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness: • Statements made in the heat of excitement and close in time to a crime are considered reliable. • The declarant did not have the time or opportunity to fabricate or contrive a falsehood (“comes from the heart”).

8. Hearsay Exception Dying Declaration: is evidence of a statement made by a dying person with respect to the cause and circumstances of death. Legal Foundation: • The declarant (victim) must be under an impending sense of death(reasonably believes that he/she is going to die). 2) The statement must concern personal knowledge about the cause and circumstances surrounding the stroke of death. 3) The victim must die!

9. Hearsay Exception What if the victim isn’t under an impending sense of death or survives the incident? • Could be used as a: • Spontaneous Statement • Prior statements of witnesses • But not a dying declaration!

10. Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness: “Oh, but they say the tongues of dying men, enforce attention like deep harmony; where words are scarce they are seldom spent in vain; for they breathe truth that breathe their words in pain (William Shakespeare) A person would not lie on one’s deathbed - want to “meet the maker” with a clear conscience.

11. Dying Declaration?

12. Hearsay Exception Prior Statements Of Witnesses: Legal Foundation: • After a person testifies in court, another person who received or overheard the statement by that witness may be called to repeat all or part of the prior utterance when: • 2 Prong Test: • Impeachment(inconsistent with one’s present testimony) • Corroborate or Rehabilitation(to “fill in the blanks”) Note: See text for examples

13. Hearsay Exception Test For Trustworthiness: • All dueprocess and cross-examinationrights are afforded during the testimony of both the original declarant and the follow-up witness who testifies.

14. Hearsay Exception: Former Testimony and Witness Unavailable: Legal foundation: • The former testimony was given under oath or affirmation with an opportunity for discovery and cross-examination of the witness. • There is an officialtranscript of the former testimony. • The original witness is unavailable to testify at the subsequent court hearing due to death, injury, sickness, incapacity, unable to locate for subpoena, refusal to appear in court, etc Note: See text for examples

15. Test for Trustworthiness: all due process and cross-examination rights were afforded at the prior court hearing.

16. Hearsay Exception BusinessRecords: Records kept in the normal course and routine of a business or private enterprise. • Bank of America • Southern California Edison • Verizon • Visa • Memorial Hospital • Home Depot

17. Hearsay Exception OfficialRecords: are public records kept in the normal course of events by a public agency. Examples: • Department of Motor Vehicles • Department of Justice • County of Los Angeles • City of Wilmington • LAHC

18. OFFICIAL RECORDS • What other hearsay exception could apply in this case? • SpontaneousStatement

19. Hearsay Exception Business & Official Records: Legal Foundation: 1) Record was made in the normalcourse of business or public transaction. 2) The record was made at or near the time of the event or information recorded (contemporaneous). 3) The source of information and method of preparation are trustworthy.

20. Hearsay Exception Business & Official Records: Test For Trustworthiness: • There is a high probability that records and documents prepared in the normal course of duties are accurate and reliable. • Any person who is familiar with the record and how it is prepared may authenticate and testify to its contents. • It is not necessary to have the originalauthor testify about the record.

21. Hearsay Exception Hearsay Evidence At Preliminary Hearings (Prop. 115 Rule) An officer with five or moreyears experience or who has completed a POST training class may give hearsay evidence at preliminaryhearings for the purpose of establishing probablecause the defendant committed the felony charged.

22. Hearsay Exception Hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings (prop. 115 rule) • Only firstlevel hearsay is permitted. • Not “totempole” hearsay. Example: witness tells officer - who tells a detective what the witness said. • The detective could not give hearsay evidence in court because he/she didn’t personally interview the witness.