1 / 29

Applied Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

Applied Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Grand Junction, Colorado November 2010. Today’s Format. Two-hour session to accommodate facilitated discussion

sharrington
Download Presentation

Applied Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Applied Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management Grand Junction, ColoradoNovember 2010

  2. Today’s Format • Two-hour session to accommodate facilitated discussion • Presentation on the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Legacy Management (LM) Applied Science & Technology (AS&T) program • Introduce Panel – brief summaries • Break? • Proposed discussion topics • Full audience participation • Goal: discuss opinions on future direction of groundwater research for long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) • Product: chart of favorable areas for applied research for groundwater remediation

  3. AS&T Subtask LM provides funding through AS&T to: • Evaluate technologies to improve LTS&M remediation strategies. • Solve mechanical and chemical problems in LM activities at sites. • Use technologies to make remedies more sustainable.

  4. Two Main Areas of Emphasis • Groundwater projects • Surface projects (disposal cell covers, phytoremediation)

  5. Map of LM Sites

  6. Main Contaminants • Uranium • Nitrate • Sulfate • Ammonium • Vanadium • Molybdenum • Selenium • Arsenic • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) • Fission products (e.g., tritium)

  7. AS&T Projects Analysis Charts • Only includes projects within AS&T; includes some projects from LM predecessor [Office of Environmental Management (EM)] • Includes many other projects in LM that have technology innovations; e.g., Rocky Flats, Pinellas, Central Nevada Test Area • There are lumpers and splitters; organized by project reports

  8. AS&T Projects by Breadth of Application

  9. AS&T Projects by Cost

  10. AS&T Projects by Technology Type

  11. AS&T Projects by Remediation Approach

  12. LM Site Contaminants AS&T Projects by Contaminant

  13. Contaminant Plume F l o w Permeable Reactive Barrier Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB): Evolution of an Applied Research Project Trench (filled) Aquifer

  14. Approach • 1998: Laboratory treatability studies • 1998: Field columns • Geochemical modeling • 1999: PRB installation • 1999–2010: Performance evaluation • Routine groundwater sampling • Two episodes of coring/analysis • Tracer testing • Residence time determination using 222Rn • Four episodes of hydraulic conductivity testing • 2005: Treatment cells installed

  15. Geochemical Modeling: Mineral Zonation in Approach to ZVI Saturation

  16. PRB Installation

  17. Coring for Performance Evaluation 9 tons of calcite deposited in the first 3 years

  18. Groundwater Flow Hydraulic Conductivity in Monticello PRB After 4 YearsRed = low conductivity

  19. Performance Evaluation:Hydraulic Conductivity

  20. PRB Performance: Mineralization of ZVI Electron microprobe photomicrograph of core material

  21. Residence Time Dependency

  22. Implementation of Treatment Cells

  23. Chelate Enhancement ofZero-Valent Iron Treatment

  24. Lakeview Mound Old Rifle Green River Central Nevada Test Area Rocky Flats New Rifle Monticello Durango Monument Valley Weldon Spring Shiprock LM Sites SOARS Sites Salmon LM Sites and System Operations and Analysis at Remote Sites (SOARS)

  25. SOARS System Innovations • Post processor allows instant access by all LM personnel; reliable means to record notes on activities • Use of three-point calculations that automatically plot the orientation and velocity of groundwater • Remote collection of tracer data (rhodamine) • Remote operation of well pumps (automated pump tests)

  26. Summary: LM’s AS&T Program (Groundwater) • Operate geochemical/ecological laboratory • Operate SOARS telemetry system • Conduct applied scientific research • Directions to date have emphasized: • Low cost • Site-specific projects • Radionuclide/sulfate/nitrate/oxyanion contaminants • Site characterization/remediation What directions should applied science for legacy management be going?

  27. Start of Facilitated Session

  28. Suggested Discussion Topics • Big or small science • Promising technologies for groundwater remediation. What should LM’s role be? • What are other agencies (e.g., DOE-EM, DOE Office of Science, U.S. Department of Defense, Armys Corps, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) doing? Overlap? • Basic research vs. applied research vs. project support • Groundwater remediation vs. point-of-use treatment

  29. Suggested Discussion Topics (continued) • Groundwater contamination • Is it better to stabilize groundwater contamination (e.g., acetate injection) or enhance removal (e.g., in-situ leaching with oxidant and carbonate for uranium)? • Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) • How much emphasis? • Is this going to be the future? • How to approach MNA? • Major issues and future of research? • Technical impracticability • What is it and what role does it play?

More Related