210 likes | 337 Views
What’s that Smell?. Alyson McCroskey, Lauren Williams, Maggy Gleason. What’s That Smell? Habitat Preference for decorated crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus , based on predator olfactory cues from feces of the Leopard Gecko, Eublepharis macularius . . Introduction:.
E N D
What’s that Smell? Alyson McCroskey, Lauren Williams, Maggy Gleason
What’s That Smell?Habitat Preference for decorated crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus,based on predator olfactory cues from feces of the Leopard Gecko, Eublepharismacularius.
Introduction: • Predator avoidance may occur if prey can detect predators early, which therefore may increase fitness. (Brettschneider & Bateman 2004). • Visual, acoustic, and olfactory cues • Predators may leave behind olfactory cues in the form of feces. Feces supplies the prey with information about the threat status of a predator(Madison et al., 1999).
Introductions: • Gryllodes sigillatus – known as the decorated cricket. • Located in South Western United States • Common predators include; spiders, birds, mice, and lizards. (Kortet, R. & Hendrick A. 2004)
Introduction: • Eublepharis macularius- known as Leopard Gecko • Geckos orient themselves to the male cricket call, so they can consume the females that come looking for a mate. (Sakaluk & Belwood, 1984).
Introduction: • Crickets may use olfactory cues to identify predators in their habitats. • Females use chemosensory cues to detect males they have previously mated with to avoid mating with that male again.(Ivy et al., 2005).
Introduction: Hypothesis • If crickets use olfactory cues to detect a predator, then they would prefer habitats without the predator. • Prediction: When crickets are given a choice between two habitats, one with the presence of predator olfactory cues and one without, they will choose the habitat without the cue.
Methods: • November 16, 2008 at Illinois State University • Sampled 30 male and 30 female decorated crickets that were previously isolated into male and female containers for 1 week. • Trials were conducted during the dark phase of the photoperiod under red light illumination. • Feces was collected from 2 leopard geckos at University High School which are fed mainly meal worms, and sometimes crickets.
Methods: • 12 shoebox sized plastic containers • Solution of Leopard gecko feces- 90ml of tap water and approximately 2 grams of crushed feces. • Cotton balls • One zero sampling in 30 second intervals for a total of 15 minutes
Methods: Calculations • Statistical analysis using a one – tailed t-test, with a significance level of α = 0.05 • Calculations were done using proportions • Intervals spent on the side ÷ total number of intervals
Discussion • Our hypothesis was not supported, male and female decorated crickets did not spend a larger proportion of time on the side without the feces olfactory cue. • Both spent a larger proportion of time on the side with the feces olfactory cue. • Only significant in females
Discussion • Predator avoidance is less common in invertebrates (Brettschneider & Bateman 2004). • In another experiment, Platygryllus primiformis, preferred shrew feces-treated habitat to a water treated habitat(Brettschneider & Bateman 2004)
Discussion: • Females use olfactory cues for mating(Ivy et al., 2005). • Crickets raised in captivity, never exposed to predators • Novel smell, curiosity
Discussion • Error: Geckos did not consume crickets before feces samples were collected • Predator feces give off olfactory cues based on the prey they consume. The prey can chemically label these cues as a high risk predator. (Madison et al., 1999). • Larger sample size and increase total time of experiment.
Discussion: • Future experiments • Possible differences in the development of male and female sensory organs. • Test different sensory cues visual and auditory.
References: • Brettschneider, H. & Bateman, P. 2004. Differential shelter selection in response to predator chemical cues by two orthopterans: Libanasidusvittatus(Anostostomatidae) and Platygryllusprimiformis(Gryllidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 18: 381-387. • Ivy, T. M., Weddle, C.B., Sakaluk, S.K. 2005. Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 272: 2475–2478. • Kortet, R. & Hendrick, A. 2004. Detection of the spider predator, Hololenanedra by naïve juvenile field crickets (Gryllus integer) using indirect cues. Behaviour 141: 1189- 1196. • Madison, D.M., Maerz, J. C., and Mcdarby, J. H. 1999. Optimisation of predator avoidance by salamanders using chemical cues: Diet and dieleffects. Ethology105: 1073-1086 • Sakaluk, S.K. & Belwood, J.J. 1984. Gecko Phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of Satellite Predation. Animal Behanivor, 32: 659-662.