70 likes | 151 Views
This is a special forum where each standpoint is represented by a star. Even a cluttered star map remains well-arranged. Representational democracy is obsolete. There is no need for moderator, because the relations among opinions automatically arrange the overall view.
E N D
This is a special forum where each standpoint is represented by a star.Even a cluttered star map remains well-arranged. Representational democracy is obsolete. There is no need for moderator, because the relations among opinions automatically arrange the overall view. This evolution-like process of viewpoints will shape the result in the star map. Actually, this is not a forum anymore, buta place where knowledge is summarized,direct democracy, an open territory of a live virtual society. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 1. Start of the process: http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 2. Comment 1. Green lines represent agreement, they try to move opinions closer to each other. Red lines represent refusal, they try to move opinions farther off each other.Brightness of the stars is increased by their relations. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 2. Comment 1. A new comment is located by its own attitude to others - on the other hand it does shape the overall situation. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 2. Comment 3. Comment 1. An opinion-arena is formed, operated by an all-round, rich, and full of vitality process. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 2. Comment 3. Comment 1. The arrangement on the star map provides a true representation of the complex result of all agreements and disagreements. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.
Startpoint Comment 1. Comment 3. Comment 2. Comment 5. Any visitor can add his/her statement by evaluating at least 3 former opinions, using a scale of agreement - disagreement.(Can create a new topic too!) Would you like to try it? Comment 2. http://www.publ-iq.hu/ - The dynamic discussion of public intelligence.