1 / 18

eFarmer – Content Management and IACS Experiences

eFarmer – Content Management and IACS Experiences. Dr. László PITLIK – István PET Ő Department of Business Informatics Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary eFarmer Workshop, Bratislava; June 15 2004. Content s. Main objective of the presentation of CM SZIE – Connected Projects

shawna
Download Presentation

eFarmer – Content Management and IACS Experiences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. eFarmer – Content Management and IACS Experiences Dr. László PITLIK –István PETŐ Department of Business Informatics Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary eFarmer Workshop, Bratislava;June 15 2004

  2. Contents • Main objective of the presentation of CM • SZIE – Connected Projects • Definitions • Structure of Available Content • Dimensions • Examples for Application • Methodology of Data Processing • Main Categories of Methods

  3. Main objectives • This conception is the idealised and maximised approach of Content Management in agriculture. • Therefore every modules mentioned here can be included or excluded from the final concept – every potential combination of the included modules can be interpreted as a homogeneous system. • The expression „content” in the proposal might give quite wide score for the above-mentioned decision. • Decision criterion: e.g. maximising of income along the Project Business Plan.

  4. SZIE – Connected Projects • REMETE – county-level concept of CM(USAID, ACDI&VOCA; 1997-1998) • MAINFOKA – URL-catalogue of online sources(FVM, ACDI&VOCA) • ikTAbu – data-assets management & online algorithms(OMFB IKTA, 1999-2001) • MIMIR – IIER (IACS) – country-level concept of CM(1998-2004) • INFO-PERISCOPE – concept of external info-system(NKFP; 2001-2003) • eGovernment – anomalies in data-assets management(SZT; 2002) • SPELGR–PIT–IDARA–CAPRI – EU-level concept of CM(ACDI&VOCA, PHARE, EU; 1997-2004)

  5. Definitions • „ERP system” (accountancy, MIS) of the enterprise:Handles data created during the operation of enterprise.Role in eFarmer:Creates the basis for any control of subsidies – the official annexes of claims • External information system:Describes the (natural, legal, economic, social etc.) environment of organisations and has important role in planning, decision-arrangement, benchmarking.Role in eFarmer: community and country level requirements • Planning and monitoring system for the agricultural sector:Based on the transparent, consistent system of Economic Accounts of Agriculture.Role in eFarmer: maximising in country-level the efficiency of subsidy call-in from the EU.

  6. Structure of Available Content I. The available data-assets can be sorted according to the following dimensions: • Actual data [A]Planned / Calculated data [P] • Data about Internal conditions of the enterprise [I] External data (about the environment of enterprise) [E] • Numerical (incl. GIS) data [N]Textual data [T] • Data for public use (e.g. online sources) [O]Restricted Data [R] 16 different combinations of options should be handled

  7. Structure of Available Content II/a • Actual data [A]: • [I]-[N]-[O]: Data from PR-studies of farms • [I]-[N]-[R]: Supplying of data from farms to authorities • [I]-[T]-[O]: Brochures about enterprises • [I]-[T]-[R]: Internal regulations and reports of enterprises • [E]-[N]-[O]: Thresholds for tender evaluation • [E]-[N]-[R]: Parameters of project-monitoring • [E]-[T]-[O]: Tender guides, professional studies • [E]-[T]-[R]: Documents for limited access (e.g. for members of professional bodies)

  8. Structure of Available Content II/b • Planned / Calculated data [P]: • [I]-[N]-[O]: Enterprise-analyses for public use (e.g. shareholders) • [I]-[N]-[R]: Enterprise-analyses for credit-claims • [I]-[T]-[O]: Comments to enterprise-analyses for public use • [I]-[T]-[R]: Comments to enterprise-analyses for target groups • [E]-[N]-[O]: Data about economic trends for public use • [E]-[N]-[R]: Data about economic trends for target groups • [E]-[T]-[O]:Forecast-studies for public use • [E]-[T]-[R]: Forecast-studies for special target groups

  9. Methodology of Data Processing • Numerical analyses (classic methods of statistics, data mining, object-comparison) • Visualisation of numeric values (pivot, OLAP) • Numeric control-mechanisms(EAA) • Hybrid solutions (expert systems) • Text-based solutions (automatic translation & recognition) • Document management

  10. Thank you for the attention! http://miau.gau.hu

  11. Contents • Main objectives • Information sources • Payment agency (participation later) • Agricultural Chamber (participation later) • Media (IACS-articles) • Non-representative interviews (farmers, advisors) • FADN as a basis of the farm selection (basic information) • Theory (potential problems in IACS) • Required structure of information

  12. Main objective • Defining and structuring the raw data that might result in information value-added within the framework of eFarmer.This information value-added consists of:+ higher rate of making use of subsidy on farm-level,+ higher efficiency of subsidy call-in on country-level,– lower operational cost on enterprise- and country-level.

  13. Experiences I. - Media • http://www.nol.hu/(27 May 2004) • Number of registered farmers: 305.000 • Registered area after submission: approx. 5.400.000 ha • Registered area after primary checks: 4.400.000 ha(Overclaiming for about 1.000.000 ha)

  14. Experiences II. - Interviews Outlines: • Non-representative, personal impressions • Target-groups: farmers, advisors, experts Conclusion: • There are no accomplished manuals for certain modules (like MEPAR) • There is no codified internal controlling method yet (e.g. in the PA) • Completing these application forms is no more complicated than any forms for previous subsidies.

  15. Experiences III. - FADN • Authenticity of eFarmer project would be supported by referring to a representative sample of enterprises  FADN-system. • Brief overview of FADN-system in Hungary: • Number of farms: approx. 1900 • Attributes: Geographic area (county/region), economic size (ESU), legal status (individuals, companies), type of farming Source: Pesti-Keszthelyi-Tóth (2004)

  16. Experiences IV. - Theory • Comprehensiveness (object-oriented) • Identification of every related documents (incl. documents of on-farm inspections, annexes of claims) • Identification of every possible actions (incl. additional completion of documentation, appeal processes) • Accuracy – supporting: • Identification of parcels (analyses on the grounds of game-theory to handle overclaiming) • Planning on country-level (maximising of subsidy call-in) • Planning on farm-level  MAX(subsidies – related costs)

  17. Required structure of information about claims to detect the information value-added effects • Multi-dimensional structure for drill-down (pivot, OLAP) • Dimensions: • Detailed Regional aspects • Detailed Farm attributes (economic size, legal form, activity) • Description of the schemes • Typical errors in submitted claims • Advisors contributing in filling in the claims (and the related costs) • „Problematic” claims(rejection, additional completion, appeal) • …

  18. Thank you for the attention! http://miau.gau.hu/magisz Bibliography: Pesti Csaba-Keszthelyi Krisztián-Tóth Tamás (2004): Regional comparison of farms on the basis of the FADNdatabase, Gazdálkodás 8. számúkülönkiadás XLVIII. évfolyam, 2004

More Related