70 likes | 78 Views
Explore the various modeling capabilities including box, mixed layer, regional, global, and chemistry-climate models. Discuss the potential advantages, future developments, and implications for our role in HALO.
E N D
MODELING GROUP A. Pozzer, N. Ojha, D. Akritidis, M. Lozano, H. Ouwersloot, K. Klingmueller, M. Hendrik, M. Tanarhte, R. Janssen, S. Bacer, D. Cabrera, C. Dongyeong, Y. Jongmin, R. Sander, D. Taraborrelli, C. Bruehl, B. Steil, A. Tsimpidis, V. Karidis, (H. Riede, S. Gromov, P. Zimmermann) 05.05.2011,
MODEL CAPABLITIES • CAABA → Box model • VERTICO/MESSy → Mixed Layer Model • WRF-Chem → Regional Model • EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy) → Global model • EMAC-MPIOM → Chemistry Climate model - 2 -
MODEL CAPABLITIES • CAABA → Box model • VERTICO/MESSy → Mixed Layer Model • WRF-Chem → Regional Model • EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy) → Global model • EMAC-MPIOM → Chemistry Climate model KPP based MESSy based - 3 -
VERTICO/MESSy - 4 -
Log (CO) 21x21 km Log (CO_emiss) 7x7 km WRF-Chem - 5 -
ISSUES & REQUESTS • Our 3-years plan : Organic chemistry (Aromatics, Therpenes...) Any better suggestion ? (Budget HOx in UTLS vs nighttime chemistry vs cold temperature chemistry … ) • Domenico will probably leave : MOM is almost finished, but what is the future for our chemistry? We need “chemists” like Rolf/Domenico ! • Do we really need all this models? Who is really getting the advantage from them? • What about the chemical forecast? DLR status and implications for our role in HALO. • Model development rather limited (more application)... but that's fine. • University relationship → Maybe easier for Graduate Center application? • Any further request/interactions possible? John → CAABA vs Facsimile Jonathan → Limited. Project related Horst→ campaign analysis with EMAC (!!) Hartwig → No needs of modelers - 6 -
Ich habe Fertig! - 7 -