400 likes | 597 Views
Hemisphere Asymmetries. Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?. Hemisphere Asymmetries. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis. Sergent (1982) Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information
E N D
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information
Spatial Frequencies Low Medium High
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information • Receptive field size • Small in left hemisphere • Large in right hemisphere
Visual Receptive Fields • On center / off surround • Accentuates edges
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow Wide Narrow
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) Response time (ms) Hemisphere
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow • Faster at narrow than wide in left hemisphere
But Wait… • Does this mean that hemispheres are more or less adept depending on the size of the stimulus? • In early visual areas, yes • In later visual areas, no • Size information is processed separately from shape information in high-level vision areas • Receptive fields receive information from other neurons
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999)
Local vs. Global Unfiltered Low-pass filtered (No high frequencies) High-pass filtered (No low frequencies)
Spatial Relationships • Low frequency information may be insufficient for above-below decision when dot is close to line • Left hemisphere better at categorical judgments than right because high frequency information is needed in the close condition
Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes
Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes • Small receptive fields cannot overlap as much • Does not allow coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of parts
Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies
Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies • Low spatial frequencies suffice for face recognition
Speech Comprehension • Understanding streams of spoken words requires processing high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere adept with high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere better than right at spoken word comprehension • Comprehending prosody requires processing low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere adept with low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere better than left at prosodic comprehension
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Many, Many More… • Emotion • Expressing, perceiving • RH > LH • Valence • RH = negative; LH = positive • Action • RH = withdraw; LH = approach • Stereotyping • LH > RH • Music • RH > LH
Asymmetries in Non-Humans • Chickens and pigeons • Left hemisphere advantage for categorizing food vs. non-food items • Right hemisphere advantage for learning exact location of food source • Macaque monkey • Left hemisphere lesions impair comprehension of vocalizations by other macaques • Right hemisphere lesions impair face discrimination