1 / 21

Current Flattening in Software and Hardware for Security Applications

Current Flattening in Software and Hardware for Security Applications. Authors: R. Muresan, C. Gebotys Presentation By: Radu Muresan. Outline. Introduction Power analysis attacks (PAAs) Definitions, examples, countermeasures Current flattening technique

sheena
Download Presentation

Current Flattening in Software and Hardware for Security Applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Current Flattening in Software and Hardware for Security Applications Authors: R. Muresan, C. Gebotys Presentation By: Radu Muresan CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  2. Outline • Introduction • Power analysis attacks (PAAs) • Definitions, examples, countermeasures • Current flattening technique • Definition, methodology, implementations • Current flattening as a countermeasure against PAAs • Results and conclusions CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  3. Plaintext Ciphertext Encryption Message Channel ke Plaintext Decryption Key Channel kd Key Generation Introduction • Embedded systems are increasingly used in security applications • The software and the hardware components must be secure against all threats • Current flattening is a potential countermeasure against PAAs Secret-key Cryptosystem: ke = kd Public – key Cryptosystem: ke ≠ kd CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  4. Power Supply Current or Power Measurement R Attacker’s Point Cryptographic Device What is a Power Analysis Attack ? • Side-channel attacks exploit correlation between secret parameters and variations in timing, power consumption, and other emanations from cryptographic devices to reveal secret keys CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  5. Example, DPA Attack on a Scalar Multiplication Algorithm for EC Protocols • DPA, uses correlation between power consumption and specific key-dependent bits • kP, scalar multiplication • Double-and-add approach, binary k(2) = (kn-1,...,k0) • kP1,kP2,...,kPn => Ci(t) = power • kn-1 = 1; After the first iteration => Q[0] = 2Pi • Second iteration • If kn-2=1 => Q[1] = 4P • If kn-2=0 => Q[1] = 5P • g(t)=<Ci(t)>i=1,...,k|si=1 - <Ci(t)>i=1,...,k|si=0 CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  6. Example, DPA Attack on a Scalar Multiplication Algorithm for EC Protocols Simulated correlation function between the points 4Pi and power consumption Ci(t) when kn-2 = 0. • A peak is observed when 4Pi are computed by the card • No peak is observed when 4Pi are never computed by the card CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  7. Countermeasures Against PAAs • Against timing attacks • Equalizing; Randomizing; Blinding • Against simple power analysis attacks • Avoiding; Creating; Symmetric • Against differential power analysis attacks • Randomization; Blinding • Hardware: non-deterministic techniques • Against all PAAs • Proposed: current flattening technique CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  8. Attacker’s Point Cryptographic Device External Current Filtering Devices Current Flattening (internal) What is Current Flattening? • Current flattening targets a flat (emission free) current consumption measured at an attacker’s point of a cryptographic device CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  9. Behind Current Flattening • Current consumption in a processor is a function of: • The hardware architecture • The instruction type • The instruction sequencing • Data manipulated Examples of current dynamics CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  10. Software Method • Program execution is composed of two types of cycles • charging; discharging • Code transformations are generated for classes of instructions Example Current measurements used for determining code transformations CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  11. Hardware Method • Pipeline current flattening module CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  12. Hardware Method • Feedback current module CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  13. Does Current Flattening Protect Against PAAs? • Software method does not support DPA due to the fact that the program to data dependencies are not covered • Hardware method has potential to cover all PAAs • Supports real-time current adjustment at the clock frequency • Covers both current to data and to instruction dependencies CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  14. Results of Software Flattening • The experiments used the polymulNIST.asm implementation of an EC scalar multiplication (kP), where: • P a fixed point on a known elliptic curve • k a secret key • Target processor: Motorola SC140 DSP Real current measurements CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  15. Pk-Pk current variation reduced by 70 to 78% Energy consumption increased by 71 to 74% Execution time increased by up to 135% Results of Software Flattening Data analysis for software flattening CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  16. Results of Hardware Flattening • Instantaneous current simulation for polymul.asm • polymul.asm is a subroutine of polymulNIST.asm • polymul.asm is a target of PAAs • Target system • Motorola SC140 DSP plus the Feedback Current Module Current simulation and real current measurement CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  17. Pk-Pk current variation reduced by 94 to 97% Energy consumption increased by up to 16% Execution time increased by up to 29% Results of Hardware Flattening Data analysis for hardware flattening CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  18. Conclusions • The paper presented the mechanisms of the internal current flattening technique (ICF) • ICF controls power consumption and current variation • Countermeasure against PAAs • Limitations • Increased execution time and energy consumption CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  19. Future Work • Investigate an ASIC implementation of the PAAR architecture • Methods to improve the performance and energy consumption of implementations using ICF CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  20. References Used for the Presentation • Slides 3 and 4 • W. Mao, “Modern Cryptography”, Prentice Hall, 2004 • O. Kommerling, M. G. Kuhn, “Design principles for tamper-resistant smartcard processors”, In Workshop on Smartcard Technology 1999 • Slides 5, 6 and 7 • J-S. Coron, “Resistance against dpa for elliptic curve cryptosystems”, CHES’99 • P. Kocher, et al., “Differential power analysis”, In CRYPTO’99 • Slide 9 • R. Muresan, C. Gebotys, “Instantaneous current modeling in a complex vliw processor core”, In ACM TECS, 2004 CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

  21. THANK YOU! Questions? CODES+ISSS'04, September 8-10, 2004, Stockholm, Sweden

More Related