470 likes | 544 Views
Multiple ionization including post-collisional contributions. Claudia Montanari. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio Buenos Aires, Argentina. H + + Kr. -18. 10. sec. projectile. photon. 3+. photon. 10 -15 sec. -5. 10. sec. 6+. PCI=time delayed electron emision
E N D
Multiple ionization including post-collisional contributions Claudia Montanari Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio Buenos Aires, Argentina
-18 10 sec projectile
photon 3+ photon 10-15 sec
-5 10 sec 6+ PCI=time delayed electron emision Independent of the projectile Multiple ionization data includes PCI
ò s = p 2 b P ( b ) db q q Multinomial distribution æ ö N N å Õ ç ÷ - i = - q N q P ( b ) p ( 1 p ) i i i ç ÷ q i i q è ø + + + = q q ... q i 1 i = q 1 2 N ionization probability per electron pi(b), of the i-subshell Direct multiple ionization Cross section for ionization of q target electrons Independent particle model (IPM)
CDW-EIS • Angular expansion in spherical harmonics • The radial Scrödinger eq. is numericallly solved • initial bound • final continuum states • Ortogonality, asymptotic condicions • T-matrix expanded in Fourier series • Projectile: • Hartree-Fock • positive ions First Born æ ö N N å Õ ç ÷ - i = - q N q P ( b ) p ( 1 p ) i i i ç ÷ q i i q è ø + + + = q q ... q i 1 i = q 1 2 N Miraglia & Gravielle Phys Rev A 78 (2008) Multinomial distribution
Sn Fi,n= 1 æ ö N N å Õ ç ÷ i = P ( b ) ( pix1)qi - - N q ç ÷ ( 1 p ) i i q q i è ø + + + = = q q ... q q i 1 i 1 2 N Multiple ionization including PCI Multinomial distribution
no of Auger electrons Single ionization of an electron in the subshellm Fm,n SnFm,n = 1 Krause & Carlson in the 60s Landers et al 2009, Phys. Rev Lett Brünken et al 2002, Phys. Rev A Tamenori et al 2004, J. Phys. B Hikosaka et al 2004, Phys. Rev. A Hayaishi et al 2002, J.Phys. B
no of Auger electrons Single ionization of an electron in the subshellm Fm,n SnFm,n = 1 Ar 3p 3s 3p-2 3s-1 L-shell 0.81 0.112 0.008 0.00 0.00 Krause & Carlson in the 60s Landers et al 2009, Phys. Rev Lett Brünken et al 2002, Phys. Rev A PCI of valence electrons ? Tamenori et al 2004, J. Phys. B Hikosaka et al 2004, Phys. Rev. A Hayaishi et al 2002, J.Phys. B
Sn Fi,n= 1 æ ö N N å Õ ç ÷ i = P ( b ) ( pix1)qi - - N q ç ÷ ( 1 p ) i i q q i è ø + + + = = q q ... q q i 1 i 1 2 N Multiple ionization including PCI Multinomial distribution
Sn Fi,n= 1 æ ö N N å Õ ç ÷ i = P ( b ) ( pi SnFi,n)qi - - N q ç ÷ ( 1 p ) i i q q i è ø + + + = = q q ... q q i 1 i 1 2 N PCI Pa (b)= SP P PCI (ai) including PCI a1s + a2s + …= a i Number of total emitted electron (direct+PCI) Multiple ionization including PCI Multinomial distribution
Results E= (0.1-10) MeV/amu Xe Kr Ar Ne
+2 Li2+, Be2+ Results E= (0.1-10) MeV/amu Xe Kr Ar Ne +1 H+,He+ +3 +2 Be3+, B3+ He2+ B2+ Li3+
K-shell PCI H+ + Ne
2s & 2p – PCI ? Shake-off ? H+ + Ne Carlson & Nestor (1973) Kochur et al (2006)
Summary • Multiple ionization cross sections, independent particle model, multinomial distribution, CDW-EIS • PCI is included using photoionization branching ratios. • Good description of Ar, Kr and Xe targets. Overestimation of Ne in the intermediate energy region (direct ionization) • Effective ion charge for multiple ionization, lower for single than for multiple • Open questions that deserve research • +Limits of the IPM?: Multinomial statistic? Importance of correlation? Changes in the target potential? Why a different answer for Ne and Kr? • +Other PCI contributions in Ne, shake off? Again, why a different answer for Ne and Kr? • More experimental data is neededfor different ions in gases
Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil • Eduardo Montenegro • Wania Wolf • Hugo Luna • Antonio Santos Instituto de Astronomia y Física del Espacio, Buenos Aires, Argentina • Maria Silvia Gravielle • Diego Arbo • Dario Mitnik • Claudio Archubi • Jorge Miraglia • Dep Physics, University of Missouri, USA • Robert DuBois
Carlson & Nestor (1973) Mukoshama (1989) Kochur et al (2006)
Total ionization cross section Miraglia and Gravielle, Phys. Rev A 81 (2010) 042709