180 likes | 314 Views
“DE ZANDE” Looking for inspiration in complex cases. 27 september Euromet 2013. 20 minutes Framework 60 minutes sharing best practices in sub- groups Level of policy Level of institution Level of the youngster and context.
E N D
“DE ZANDE” Lookingforinspiration in complex cases 27 september Euromet 2013
20 minutes Framework • 60 minutes sharing best practices in sub-groups • Level of policy • Level of institution • Level of the youngsterand context
Part 1Profile of ourinstitution : someelements (as is) • Juvenilejudge / compulsary treatment • POS/ MOF • Duration of stay • Target Group • Patterson / Experiential learning /Context / LSCI/ Restorative practices • Open/closed • Education / School / Stay
Beernem Capacity for the whole of Flanders Open: 10 Closed: 36 Our Case Marie was placed in an open setting
Ruiselede Boys Capacity Open: 44 Open – Time-out: 10 Closed : 26 for west and East Flanders + Brussels Our case Stijn Jansens Open
PedagogicalAspects • Reception/ Educational / Treatment • Groups of 10 youngsters (GRT: 6) • 9 educators / Socialworker / Psychologist • Individual program / groupactivities • Structured free-time (sport, cooking, creativity,…) / Goal oriented programs (selfbuilding-group, experiential-learningprojects, equip-training, …
Beernem / Ruiselede School Building
School • Minister of education Minister of Welfare • Teachers are part in the wholeaid system • Principles • Individual approach • Max. 6 in a class • Try to give the youngster the lessons she/he has in the direction/year the extern school • 3 hours theoretical lessons: mathematics, language, history, geography, sports, computer • 3 hours practical lessons (gender focused)
Practical lessons Beauty care Mode Office/Sales Catering Nutrition
Practical lessonsRuiselede • construction • welding • wood • painting • horticulture • electricity • sales office
How can we give context-oriented support when the, onlyavailable, family member of the youngster no longerwishesto accept him home? How is thishandled in yourinstitution?
How can we shape the education of suchyoungpeople? Is itjustifiedtoteach 6 consecutivehours of class toyoungpeoplewith a cognitiveandmotoricfunctioningthat is tooweak? How does the staffcopewithsuchproblems in yourinstitution? Conflictingpropositions: The groupeducatorsarguethateveryyoungstershouldbe in classicaleducationfor 6 hours, whileteachersarguethatthis is unsafefor the boy
Canitbejustifiedtodeny class toyoungpeople, forwhom the school career is developing without problems, for the sake of therapysessions? Multiple care questions gave riseto multiple priorities: whodetermines the prioritiesandwhat steps are tobe made first? Is itjustifiedtorelegate a strong point to the background toaddress a weakness first? (First therapy, theneducation?). How does staffcopewithsuchproblems in yourinstitution? Proposition: Psychologistswillfind a groupconversation more important than a math class where the youngster is preparingfor her exam.
How are activitiesorganized in the living groups in yourinstitution? Proposition: Everyone is equalbefore the law. Allyoungpeople have toaccomplisch the sameacitivities/tasksregardless of theirproblematicsituation/background.