1 / 25

The Math and Magic of Financial Derivatives

The Math and Magic of Financial Derivatives. Klaus Volpert Villanova University March 31, 2008. Financial Derivatives have been called. . . .Engines of the Economy . . . Alan Greenspan (long-time chair of the Federal Reserve)

Download Presentation

The Math and Magic of Financial Derivatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Math and Magic of Financial Derivatives Klaus Volpert Villanova UniversityMarch 31, 2008

  2. Financial Derivatives have been called. . . • . . .Engines of the Economy. . .Alan Greenspan(long-time chair of the Federal Reserve) • . . .Weapons of Mass Destruction. . .Warren Buffett(chair of investment fund Berkshire Hathaway)

  3. Famous Calamities • 1994: Orange County, CA: losses of $1.7 billion • 1995: Barings Bank: losses of $1.5 billion • 1998: LongTermCapitalManagement (LTCM) hedge fund, founded by Meriwether, Merton and Scholes. Losses of over $2 billion

  4. September 2006: the Hedge Fund Amaranth closes after losing $6 billion in energy derivatives. • January 2007: Reading (PA) School District has to pay $230,000 to Deutsche Bank because of a bad derivative investment • October 2007: Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, all declare billions in losses in derivatives related to mortgages and loans (CDO’s) due to rising foreclosures

  5. On the Other Hand • In November 2006, a hedge fund with a large stake (stocks and options) in a company, which was being bought out, and whose stock price jumped 20%, made $500 million for the fund in the process • The head trader, who takes 20% in fees, earned $100 million in one weekend.

  6. So, what is a Financial Derivative? • Typically it is a contract between two parties A and B, stipulating that, - depending on the performance of an underlying asset over a predetermined time - , so-and-so much money will change hands.

  7. An Example: A Call-option on Oil • Suppose, the oil price is $40 a barrel today. • Suppose that A stipulates with B, that if the oil price per barrel is above $40 on Aug 1st 2009, then B will pay A the difference between that price and $40. • To enter into this contract, A pays B a premium • A is called the holder of the contract, B is the writer. • Why might A enter into this contract? • Why might B enter into this contract?

  8. Other such Derivatives can be written on underlying assets such as • Coffee, Wheat, and other `commodities’ • Stocks • Currency exchange rates • Interest Rates • Credit risks (subprime mortgages. . . ) • Even the Weather!

  9. Fundamental Question: • What premium should A pay to B, so that B enters into that contract?? • Later on, if A wants to sell the contract to a party C, what is the contract worth?

  10. Test your intuition: a concrete example • Current stock price of Microsoft is $19.40. (as of last night) • A call-option with strike $20 and 1-year maturity would pay the difference between the stock price on January 22, 2009 and the strike (as long the stock price is higher than the strike.) • So if MSFT is worth $30 then, this option would pay $10. If the stock is below $20 at maturity, the contract expires worthless. . . . . . • So, what would you pay to hold this contract? • What would you want for it if you were the writer? • I.e., what is a fair price for it?

  11. Want more information ? • Here is a chart of recent stock prices of Microsoft.

  12. Price can be determined by • The market (as in an auction) • Or mathematical analysis:in 1973, Fischer Black and Myron Scholes came up with a model to price options.It was an instant hit, and became the foundation of the options market.

  13. They started with the assumption that stocks follow a random walk on top of an intrinsic appreciation:

  14. That means they follow a Geometric Brownian Motion Model: whereS = price of underlyingdt = infinitesimal time perioddS= change in S over period dtdX = random variable with N(0,√dt)σ = volatility of Sμ = average percentage return of S

  15. The Black-Scholes PDE V =value of derivativeS =price of the underlyingr =riskless interest ratσ=volatilityt =time

  16. Different derivatives correspond to different boundary conditions on the PDE. • for the value of European Call and Put-options, Black and Scholes solved the PDE to get a closed formula:

  17. Where N is the cumulative distribution function for a standard normal random variable, and d1 and d2 are parameters depending on S, E, r, t, σ • This formula is easily programmed into Maple or other programs

  18. For our MSFT-example • S=19.40 (the current stock-price)E=20 (the `strike-price’)r=3.5%t=12 monthsand. . . σ=. . .? • Ahh, the volatility σ • Volatility=standard deviation of (daily) returns • Problem: historic vs future volatility

  19. Volatility is not as constant as one would wish . . . Let’s use σ= 40%

  20. Put all this into Maple: • with(finance); • evalf(blackscholes(19.40, 20, .035, 1, .40)); • And the output is . . . . • $3.11 • The market on the other hand trades it • $3.10

  21. Discussion of the PDE-Method • There are only a few other types of derivative contracts, for which closed formulas have been found • Others need numerical PDE-methods • Or . . . . • Entirely different methods: • Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Trees • Monte Carlo Methods

  22. S=102 S=101 S=100 S=100 S=99 S=98 Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (1979) This approach uses the discrete method of binomial trees to price derivatives This method is mathematically much easier. It is extremely adaptable to different pay-off schemes.

  23. Monte-Carlo-Methods • Instead of counting all paths, one starts to sample paths (random walks based on the geometric Brownian Motion), averaging the pay-offs for each path.

  24. Monte-Carlo-Methods • For our MSFT-call-option (with 3000 walks), we get $3.10

  25. Summary • While each method has its pro’s and con’s,it is clear that there are powerful methods to analytically price derivatives, simulate outcomes and estimate risks. • Such knowledge is money in the bank, and let’s you sleep better at night.

More Related