1 / 50

Renal Highlights 2016 Disclosure belangen Prof.dr. W. van Biesen

Explore the impact of intensive glycemic control on CKD patients with diabetes, preferred oral agents, and related outcomes. ERBP mission to improve kidney patient care. Review observational data and considerations for advanced CKD patients.

shenad
Download Presentation

Renal Highlights 2016 Disclosure belangen Prof.dr. W. van Biesen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Renal Highlights 2016 Disclosure belangen Prof.dr. W. van Biesen

  2. ERBP Guideline on management of diabetics with advanced CKD

  3. ERBP Mission improve the outcome of patients with kidney disease in a sustainable way, through enhancing the accessibility of knowledge on patient care, in a format that stimulates its use in clinical practice.

  4. Outline • Is intensive glycemic control as measured by HbA1C advantageous in diabetic patients with CKD 3b-5d? • What oral agent should be preferred as first line agent in patients with CKD 3b-5d with impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes

  5. HbA1c is significantly correlated to eGFR With thanks to Rikke Borg K. Shima; Ann Clin Biochem; 2012, vol. 49, 68-74

  6. Hb, EPO & Hb A1C Inaba JASN 18:896 2007

  7. Adjusted mortality rate in ESRD and DM: HbA1c

  8. Adjusted mortality rate in ESRD and DM: HbA1c • Observational data • interfering factors in HbA1C measurement

  9. CKD and Glycaemic Control Kovesdy AJKD 52:766 2008

  10. CKD and Glycaemic Control Kovesdy AJKD 52:766 2008

  11. CKD and GlycaemicControl Kovesdy AJKD 52:766 2008

  12. 1,25-Vitamin D improvesInsulin Sensitivity 16 Insulin resistant HD patients PTH 798 pg/ml did not change during study RCT 1.8 µg 1,25-vitamin D X3/week for 4 weeks vs. Control (group 2) Triglycerides 198148 mg/dL Euglycaemic clamp study A: Insulin stimulated glucose metabolism B: Insulin concentration E Oral glucose tolerance test Before: and after:  Mak KI 53,1353 1998

  13. Incretins

  14. Incretins Idorn KI 2013; 83:915

  15. Considerations in advanced CKD patients Increased risk of hypoglycemia • Decreasing renal mass leads to impaired gluconeogenesis and glycenolysis • Decreased renal clearance of insulin • Decreased clearance of hypoglycemic drugs • comorbidity and co-medication Increasing impaired glucose tolerance • Peripheral insulin resistance in CKD from counter-regulatory hormones, electrolyte abnormalities, uremic acidosis, and accumulation of uremic toxins Shortened life expectancy Increased cardiovascular risk +++

  16. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011

  17. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011

  18. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011

  19. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011 Non fatalmyocardialinfarction

  20. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011

  21. Cochrane review Hemmingsen et al, BMJ, 2011

  22. Conclusions Hard evidence for LACK of impact on all cause mortality by actively lowering HbA1C Insufficient evidence for a 10% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction Insufficient evidence for reduction in microvascular disease (combination of retinopathy, nephropathy STRONG evidence for increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia

  23. Conclusions Hard evidence for LACK of impact on all cause mortality by actively lowering HbA1C Insufficient evidence for a 10% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction Insufficient evidence for reduction in microvascular disease (combination of retinopathy, nephropathy At least in studies with an overwhelming majority of non advanced CKD patients!!!!!!

  24. Conclusions • First concern: avoid hypoglycemia • If no hypoglycemia’s and HbA1C>7%: try to intensify hypoglycemic treatment • Take into consideration comorbidity and age of patients

  25. Why do youalways have to be different?

  26. Oral antidiabetics in CKD Arnouts NDT 2014

  27. MetforminMethod of Action • Increases insulin sensitivity • Reduces glucose absorption from intestine • Increases peripheral glucose uptake in cells • Reduces gluconeogenesis in the liver • Reduces weight • Hypoglycaemia rare

  28. UKPDS Study • 4209 patients with Type 2 DM • Creatinine <175 mmol/l • Randomised to • Diet or • Insulin-sulphonylurea (normal weight) • Metformin (Body weight >120% IBW) Holman NEJM 359:1577 2008

  29. METFORMIN in advanced CKD: Scheen AJ. Metformin and lactate acidosis. Acta Clin Belg 2011, 66 (5): 329-331 ?

  30. METFORMIN • First drug of choice in all current guidelines • Cheap • No hypoglycemic risk • Weight-neutral or reducing effect • Lipid- lowering effect • Well characterized efficacy and safety profile • Impressive preventive effects with prevention of: • Diabetes • Micro- and macrovascular complications • Major events in patients with heart failure • Apoptotic neuron death • Cancer • Osteopenie • Mortality in lactic acidosis not related to to metformin

  31. METFORMIN: LACTIC ACIDOSIS Scheen AJ. Metformin and lactate acidosis. Acta Clin Belg 2011, 66 (5): 329-331

  32. A coctail of risk aversion and WYSIATI effects Herrington WG, Levy JB. Metformin: effective and safe in renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40: 411-417

  33. A coctail of risk aversion and WYSIATI effects Herrington WG, Levy JB. Metformin: effective and safe in renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40: 411-417

  34. METFORMIN: LACTIC ACIDOSIS • No firm data that lactic acidosis is more frequent in patients on metformin (Salpeter, Cochrane review) • Evidence that outcome of lactic acidosis is BETTER in patients on vs not on metformin • We have to distinguish • Lactic acidosis type A: caused by tissue hypoxia/liver damage • Lactic acidosis type B: caused by intoxication, eg metformin • We have to to distinguish: • Metformin as CAUSE of the lactic acidosis • Metformin as a drug in a patient who develops lactic acidosis because of other reasons • Mixed forms

  35. Recommendations • We recommend metformin in a dose adapted to renal function as a first line agent when lifestyle measures alone are insufficient to get HbA1C in the desired range (1B) • We recommend to add on to meformin a drug with a low risk for hypoglycaemia as a second agent when improvement of glycaemic control is deemed appropriate according to guideline (1D) • There is insufficient evidence to support insulin over an additional oral agent as add on second line treatment • We recommend instructing patients to withhold metformin in conditions of pending dehydration, when undergoing contrast media investigations, or when there is a risk for AKI

  36. advice for clinical practice • Consider to provide patients with credit-card type flyers with instructions on when to temporarily withdraw methformin • drugs with low risk for hypoglycaemia: (figure) • Metformin • Alpha glucosidase inhibitors • DPP-IV inhibitors • Incretin mimetics • SGLT-2 inhibitors • drugs with moderate risk for hypoglycaemia: • Short acting SU derivates or SU derivates with inactive metabolites • meglitinides • drugs with high risk for hypoglycaemia: • Insulin • Long acting SU derivates or derivates with active metabolites • in patients with diabetes and eGFR <45 who are on metformin, the decision to withhold the drug 48 hours before and after administration of contrast media should be taken by the treating physician, balancing the probability for emergence of contrast induced nephropathy (type and amount of contrast, intravenous vs intra-arterial), and presence of other co-existing factors that might cause sudden deterioration of kidney function (dehydration, use of NSAID, use of inhibitors of the RAAS system) against the potential harms by stopping the drug (which should be considered low in view of the short period that it should be withheld).

  37. When to start dialysis?

  38. When to start dialysis?

  39. When to start dialysis?

  40. Lipid lowering strategies?

  41. Lipid lowering strategies?

  42. Sharp trial

  43. Sharp trial

  44. Lipid lowering strategies?

  45. Lipid lowering strategies?

More Related